Since we were talking about Geno, I do want to talk about something. Square Enix wasn’t the one that didn’t want Geno in Brawl,
Nintendo didn’t want to include Geno.
I’m in a business class now, and I realized that Square Enix would be
stupid to not allow Geno. Financially, it doesn’t matter if it was Cloud or Sora because Square Enix would’ve still profited from the sales of the game because of Geno. I would be hard pressed if Square Enix could’ve been
that dumb to miss on a opportunityike that.
It’s the other way around. In Brawl, Smash just recently had third parties and they were your big heavy hitters. Not only that, but Nintendo didn’t really have any way of knowing which characters were popular outside of the obvious ones because they didn’t have any popularity polls at the time. Yeah there was one for Brawl, but that was done long after the project plan and deep into production. So back in 2004, Nintendo didn’t know if Geno would help bring people to the game, or if Geno was a popularity request, only Square would really get a win from that situation, so they decided against it.
In the end, Cloud ended up getting in for being a big icon, so Sakurai most likely decided to grab Geno when he had the chance. The ballot didn’t really take into account on Smash 4 aside from Bayonetta, so it’s probably Ultimate where Geno has a shot since his popularity would’ve been taken here.
Elma would have been a better promotional character to include in Smash 4's DLC and you know it.
I hope Sakurai decided to put her in the project plan for Ultimate instead.
I have a feeling that Sakurai may have went for Corrin, seeing how it could’ve been a one time only situation and how he liked the shape shifting idea and thought it can bring something new. Where as Elma was supposed to be relevant for a couple of years after, seeing how they said that wanted to keep supporting X with DLC.