What I mean to say is that I don't understand what there is to protect in that regard. If you wanted to make the case that this piece of clothing had such-and-such symbolic value, or that's the jewelry that her dead father, the former king, bequeathed her (just using generic tropes) or anything that could be described as having content, informational or artistic, then I'd understand.
You are assuming way out of the league, there is no "protect" obviously, since that's her design whether you like it or not. I am ok with those that are just jokingly say her designs need to change, and just straight up say her design is awful or dislike her design. I am fine with personal opinions as long as you don't try to shove it down to others... kind of like what you are doing now to be honest.
What is there to disrespect? A ploy using the sexualization of an uncomfortably young-looking girl in order to generate better sales? Honestly, I find that sort of marketing to be disrespectful to consumers, if anything.
If you are referring to Xenoblade 2, then you are absolutely wrong... not gonna lie fanservice in game do boost sales, but then again there's nothing wrong for games to have some fanserivce as long as it isn't a main part of the game or the game itself...
And no that isn't' disrespectful to consumers... because consumer have their own choice to pick up a game or not.
tl;dr
Fanservice, sexualization alone can't boost game sales... you should know this.
A more simple way to put it is that I think you might be projecting an artistic/emotional attachment by the artist to something that's rather more cynical in nature than you're giving it credit for.
No, just think prefer what the developer or designer gives put initially, if they changed it then it is their own will.
I believe you missed what I was saying. It's not about what's allowed on Switch, it's about what's allowed in Smash.
Just what do you even think what Smash is? What's allow in Smash is all up to the developer themselves, to be more realistic with you and I really hate for putting this out but most of your statement are pretty meaningless (What I mean is can't be argued nor accept) as for now... since we still haven't even seen what Smash Bros Switch looks like....
Look, I am impressed on your long statement and I am doing my best to understand, but I just want to say when it comes to designs, everyone has their own preference,
and I lieterally said that was just my own opinion....
that's what all I can say from someone who's English is his second language...
Yeah, it's just my opinion, but I mean... Look at her. She's got boobs 2 sizes bigger than they have any right to be, a skintight costume designed to accentuate what little of her body is actually covered, and you can see way too much of her skin. Even Bayonetta, a character designed to be sexual in nature, isn't nearly as revealing as she is.
Mythra isn't much better, what with her boob window and her costume that manages to be even more revealing than Pyra's.
Look, I want her in Smash as much as you do, but she's in need of a serious redesign. She's clearly just fanservice with a winning personality that the creators hope will distract you from the fact that you can see her *** in pretty much every shot she's in.
I highly recommend you to at least played the game... You might understand why she is like that....
I really can't say anything about your complaint on Pyra's design, it is your own opinion afterall. So let's agree to disagree?......
Bravely Default's change was an offensive stereotype for native americans being removed, Xenoblade Chronicles X made a 13 year old's swimsuit less revealing and TMS got 'censored' in Japan as even they didn't like it
Corrin and Bayonetta got altered in Smash 4, if the bare skin on the back of Bayonetta's legs was risky enough to the point it needed to change for Japan's age rating, Pyra's not happening without drastic changes. It's either respect the people who don't care or change it
Yes it is
That's in Bravely Second ... If I remember correctly. And hey, I am fine with that alternative design and Censorship. Because it is necessary.
Bravely Default have many design change and censorship, notable one was that bunny costume and other costume that I can't remember....
I only post link because to be fair, those costume are pretty revealing... that might violate forum rules... I take no chances.
And yes, that why I said many 3ds and Wii U games have censorship in the first place.
Corrin and Bayonetta are DLC... So they have to have some changes since the ESRB and the age rating is already set stone.
Moreover, can you bring up any Switch games that has censorship when porting to the west?
And no offense, but you still didn't bring up any legit reason to counter my statement. Not saying that you are wrong, but just how can you be so sure? Pyra in Smash without having minor changes is still likely, but then again, this is just my assumption. Nobody is right at this point.
Business decisions will trump artistic ones in a product created to be mass-produced. If Nintendo feels any character problematic, they will be altered or removed. Look at Bayonetta and Tharja.
I've said this before... so yeah...
Bayonetta was DLC (After game's release), and Tharja was never officially revealed anyway... we only get to see her because of the ESRB leak.
Probably the least surprising surprise I've heard in a while.
Tell me about it...
It's not like design tweaks would make them unrecognizable.
I agree, and I'm not against tweaks whatsoever, I just think by looking how many Switch games are being handled, I just don't see Smash get design tweaks that is literally censorship.
Actually I'm pretty sure that the Xenoblade 2 art designer was a hentai artist
Yeah... I already mention that, kudos to you though.
Actually, I had written something below the image, but felt it was redundant due me just stating what the image did fine just on it's own, so I took it out.
Didn't expect to be unintentionally breaking one of the rules here though.
That's okay, I'm not trying to be content cop or anything... I just notice this thread has some user get warning a bit frequently, but that may be just me...