Shroob
Sup?
No.
Is this legit??
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
No.
Is this legit??
I'm pretty sure that was dealt with a few days ago...
Is this legit??
How was it debunked? I don't think I was around at the time.I'm pretty sure that was dealt with a few days ago...
was it photoshop??I'm pretty sure that was dealt with a few days ago...
Something Something Geno being a mod and Rainbows road being ****ing LowpolyHow was it debunked? I don't think I was around at the time.
"Geno" is either a brawl mod, or more likely a 3ds screenshot.How was it debunked? I don't think I was around at the time.
Google translate says it's about Mario Tennis.Nintendo of Japan already tweeted something.
There was a problem fetching the tweetAnd it's not about Smash.
This could mean nothing, and we could always wait for NoA's first tweet. However, I think that would probably be blind hope.
They're saying something along the lines of that to check the support information for Mario Tennis Aces, and that they updated the Q&A to help players out about some problem.Google translate says it's about Mario Tennis.
this is about mario tennis acesNintendo of Japan already tweeted something.
There was a problem fetching the tweetAnd it's not about Smash.
This could mean nothing, and we could always wait for NoA's first tweet. However, I think that would probably be blind hope.
It 'will', but if anything, it's most likely just a video that's scheduled to be updated at an undisclosed time.You'd think that Youtube playlist update would amount to something.
I know its sarcasm, but they only come out the same day in the USA.The Octoling amiibos are coming out December 7.
Smash Bros comes out December 7.
Octolings confirmed. /s
That beautiful T-Pose. I'm speechless
Most people are not over the box one--I am. Until it's demonstrated otherwise. There's no evidence to suggest the SE character is DLC except to make it fit with the silly box.Gotta make it clear for people here y'know. Because I'm not ready for a "Copyright theory" when we're not over the box one.
Not exactly sure how I should interpret the Tweet--is this saying Tiny, Lanky, and Chunky are still owned by Rare or Nintendo? What's meant by swapped?There was a problem fetching the tweet
Somehow, I think we got the raw end of the deal.
Ah yes, the next newcomer was blatantly obvious. "My Next Door Neighbor Barges In!"
Gawrsh I wonder if that included K. Rool or not.There was a problem fetching the tweet
Somehow, I think we got the raw end of the deal.
By Vergeben's own claim there a "very realistic scenario" where the Square-Enix Characters might be DLC.Most people are not over the box one--I am. Until it's demonstrated otherwise. There's no evidence to suggest the SE character is DLC except to make it fit with the silly box
His claim is essentially to allow for the possibility, since he can't say *for sure*. It's a possible scenario, but there's nothing to indicate that's the case, outside of those who want to cling to the box. As I've said, I could be wrong--I see no good reason to believe it as of now. People are free to speculate, though.By Vergeben's own claim there a "very realistic scenario" where the Square-Enix Characters might be DLC.
He doesn't know if it's base game or DLC. But he double down on it's existence and the fact that he claim that there a realistic chance for it to be DLC is enough to speculate.
He's just making backup precautions in case the box theory is true (I doubt it is).By Vergeben's own claim there a "very realistic scenario" where the Square-Enix Characters might be DLC.
He doesn't know if it's base game or DLC. But he double down on it's existence and the fact that he claim that there a realistic chance for it to be DLC is enough to speculate.
What Nekoo said, and using one "rumor" / "leak" to disprove another is faulty. We don't know there's a SE rep in the game so there's no reason to discredit the box in that alone.Most people are not over the box one--I am. Until it's demonstrated otherwise. There's no evidence to suggest the SE character is DLC except to make it fit with the silly box.
Not exactly sure how I should interpret the Tweet--is this saying Tiny, Lanky, and Chunky are still owned by Rare or Nintendo? What's meant by swapped?
EDIT: I think I understand it. Pre-buyout: Rare had the 3 Kongs, Nintendo had B&K. Post-buyout: Rare had B&K, Nintendo had the 3 Kongs.
Except most people latch onto Box Theory because it fits Verge's rumors... except for the SE character. It's that last part that makes me doubtful of Box Theory. Verge has been correct, and even if the SE character is DLC, he still would be--but we wouldn't be talking about the SE character being DLC except for the Box. In terms of rumors, Verge has high credibility, while the box has no credibility, outside of being one of the few fan theories that have yet to be ruled out.What Nekoo said, and using one "rumor" / "leak" to disprove another is faulty. We don't know there's a SE rep in the game so there's no reason to discredit the box in that alone.
Personally I think Vergeben and the box can coexist with what Nekko said but just pointing that out.
I dunno why K.Rool is the one that matters here but it means Sakurai bot adding Diddy in Melee is likely because of thisGawrsh I wonder if that included K. Rool or not.
I knew it!Remember the Ken leak? Turns out it wasn't Ken at all...
How was it debunked? I don't think I was around at the time.
You're absolutely right that many people latched onto it because of that, but that doesn't mean you can use Vergeben to disprove it. And as I said Vergeben has tried to fit what he's heard around the box so if we are going to base whatever we believe in Vergeben on the box than that should be accounted for.Except most people latch onto Box Theory because it fits Verge's rumors... except for the SE character. It's that last part that makes me doubtful of Box Theory. Verge has been correct, and even if the SE character is DLC, he still would be--but we wouldn't be talking about the SE character being DLC except for the Box. In terms of rumors, Verge has high credibility, while the box has no credibility, outside of being one of the few fan theories that have yet to be ruled out.
Rugrats in Paris: the Movie (the Video Game) is my only N64 game that wasn't stolen. If Chucky gets in, I'm replaying it in preparation to maining him.Remember the Ken leak? Turns out it wasn't Ken at all...
K.Rool matters in every situation.I dunno why K.Rool is the one that matters here but it means Sakurai not adding Diddy in Melee is likely because of this
Well to be fair Dedede was a backup and Wario 'deserved better' than a last minute clone but we know nothing about DiddyK.Rool matters in every situation.
Also, I'm not sure if Melee is the proof of anything, we didn't get characters like Wario or King Dedede neither.
Did you just say nothing has happened on the 11th on the very first minute of the 11th
I'm going back to Smogon today. My ban expires at 1:45.Did you just say nothing has happened on the 11th on the very first minute of the 11th
Also yeah man happy birthday Noipoi
Actually, me too. I'm not his biggest fan but he seems like he could be a cool fighter.I want rex for smash....