- Joined
- Apr 22, 2010
- Messages
- 2,582
That doesn't follow.I bet you're upset at easy modes in games too. Think of the majority, casual fans
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
That doesn't follow.I bet you're upset at easy modes in games too. Think of the majority, casual fans
Why would people who aren't into competitive Smash care about desyncing? Not everyone cares about that, just because you don't care otherwise doesn't mean everyone else does. You have this problem where you think "I don't care or find it interesting" and say it in a way that says "Nobody will care because I don't and I'm super duper important!"That doesn't follow.
It doesn't. Neither does removing it. AKA, they won't care. Because it isn't the main gimmick of the Ice Climbers, their gimmick is having 2 charactersI can't control what you infer from my posts. As far as desyncing, how does it hurt casual players?
Nothing. Because that wasn't the problem, the problem was "I don't want them if they can't do it"So what's the problem with me wanting it?
Most people aren't even aware that it exists, so saying that the Ice Climbers shouldn't be included if they can't pull off a technique that most people are unaware of or don't care about seems like a really odd limitation. It's like saying that they should cut Luigi if he can't wavedash - most people aren't going to care about his ability to wavedash.And why is that a problem?
I hate Shulk, I hope he's cut in the next game.
I hate Zelda, I hope the entire series is cut in the next game.I hate Mario, I hope he's cut in the next game.
Just intruding on the conversation a little, Ness was actually meant to be replaced by Lucas in Melee but Mother 3's development was a mess and since the game didn't get released in time they kept Ness in. In Brawl, I assume Lucas was higher priority than Ness due to being on the base roster and Ness a secret character. After Brawl, since Ness was a 64 original and got in in 3 games consecutively, I think he became a guaranted stay in every smash bros. game after thatOr how Lucas was supposed to replace Ness.
There's a reason as to why that didn't happen, and I feel that it's likely gonna apply again with Xenoblade.
It's just too early to tell at this point to be honest. We've never had any situations like this so we can't know the rules.For a while now I've wondered what the odds are of us getting a new Pokemon character and retaining all of our current Pokemon veterans in the next entry.
I used to to think that Greninja had a moderate chance of getting cut in the following Smash (whenever it would come to be) but now I think it's spot in Smash is a lot more secure. As far as I can tell, Lucario largely got in for similar reasons as Greninja, and Lucartio stayed over for Smash 4 after making his Smash debut in Brawl, as did Charizard which is also a prominent and very popular Pokemon in it's own right.
It is true though that Jigglypuff is the most likely out of any of the original 12 characters to be cut....which is a shame, but even then, it's very unlikely that she'll be cut unless something takes up a serious amount of development time. She's always been one of low priority characters, but still hasn't gone anywhere so far.
I'm positive that we're going to get another Pokemon newcomer in the next game, but I'm curious. What do you guys think are the odds of every current Pokemon vet staying around for the next game (not counting a port in this case, of course), in addition to getting at least one newcomer from that same franchise?
Fair arguement, but my point still stands.Just intruding on the conversation a little, Ness was actually meant to be replaced by Lucas in Melee but Mother 3's development was a mess and since the game didn't get released in time they kept Ness in. In Brawl, I assume Lucas was higher priority than Ness due to being on the base roster and Ness a secret character. After Brawl, since Ness was a 64 original and got in in 3 games consecutively, I think he became a guaranted stay in every smash bros. game after that
I guess what you're trying to say is, that people need toPeople in this thread need to stop getting upset over other people's wants.
Seriously, I love the Ice Climbers and I want them back desynching or otherwise, but if someone else only wants them for the desynching, it's not a big deal, and also not your problem.
Let's not go standing on thin ice with the puns, alright?I guess what you're trying to say is, that people need to
chill out.
Yeah, we shouldn't let things get heated.I guess what you're trying to say is, that people need to
chill out.
Seriously guysYeah, we shouldn't let things get heated.
Yeah, that kinda left me frozen in my tracks.
Can I ask what exactly you mean by Greninja being "lower" than the other three? I'm also curious as to why you think Mewtwo isn't in the best position.It's just too early to tell at this point to be honest. We've never had any situations like this so we can't know the rules.
I'd say Greninja and Mewtwo are still on somewhat shaky ground, Greninja much less so but he's still lower than the other 3 unique Pokes. Unless Smash Switch is releasing late 2019-2020 Greninja's probably safe enough, but as we get further from Gen 6 and we get other Gens with other starters Greninja's chances start to dwindle.
I will say that Pokemon is popular and important enough to get 7+ fighters, though I'm not exactly counting on it.
I probably should have clarified that I'd say Pikachu, Charizard and Lucario are safer than Greninja. I meant he's likely lower priority than those 3 going forwards.Can I ask what exactly you mean by Greninja being "lower" than the other three? I'm also curious as to why you think Mewtwo isn't in the best position.
In any case your point about having never been in a situation quite like this is fair enough.
Plus, you'd also need to take Mewtwo being a DLC character into account; we dunno how Smash 5, and by extension the series, will treat those.I probably should have clarified that I'd say Pikachu, Charizard and Lucario are safer than Greninja. I meant he's likely lower priority than those 3 going forwards.
Mewtwo's not in the best position because in a new game he's likely lower priority than all the other Pokemon (besides Jiggs) plus the inevitable Pokemon newcomer(s).
Of course, I could be completely wrong on this though. There's too much we don't know about the next game for me to be able to make any reliable conclusion.
OK I think we need to cool alright.I guess what you're trying to say is, that people need to
chill out.
He's got a likable design and cool aura powers. Plus he gets marketed a lot, and that usually helps. Exposure often leads to people having stronger opinions, good or bad.Why do people like Lucario so much?
Because it's a good Pokemon.Why do people like Lucario so much?
Because he's sexy duh.Why do people like Lucario so much?
Why do people like Lucario so much?
He's got a likable design and cool aura powers. Plus he gets marketed a lot, and that usually helps. Exposure often leads to people having stronger opinions, good or bad.
Personally, I like Lucario because he was a standout on my team in both Black 2 and Y.
It also helps that in one movie and in Smash for Wii U/3DS, he's voiced by Sean Schemmel who dubs Dragon Ball's Goku in Funimation's English dub.A lot, if not most of Lucario's fandom came from the movie it starred in since it was a genuinely good film and the Lucario in it was a beloved character.
Other than that, most likely its design and its mastery of Aura being an interesting concept for a Pokémon.
Plus the Rule 34 artists loved it too.A lot, if not most of Lucario's fandom came from the movie it starred in since it was a genuinely good film and the Lucario in it was a beloved character.
Other than that, most likely its design and its mastery of Aura being an interesting concept for a Pokémon.
Except for moves of its own Fighting type.Plus the Rule 34 artists loved it too.
But real talk unlike Zoroark, Lucario can actually take hits in battle thanks to it's steel typing.
Yeah, fun fact I actually went to event when they were giving it away at toys ur us, very disappointed with the mon but it was fun ride there away.Except for moves of its own Fighting type.
Though Zoroark is a good example of something they tried to replicate Lucario's success with, but ultimately failed.
More than just for Zoroark being rather situational of a Pokémon to use, but because its movie wasn't as well-received and the initial reception was mixed at best for its design.
....and it didn't help that Zoroark and its pre-evolution Zorua were at the time treated like special event Pokémon with limited distribution (that required OTHER event Pokémon like Celebi and the Shiny Beast Trio).
Basically, they tried too hard to make another "Lucario" that it backfired.
Probably why X/Y didn't repeat the same mistake (though having a movie with something like Tyrantrum as the star would have been awesome and a neat throwback to the original concept of Pokémon 3 before they went with the whole Unown thing).
It does possess a very unique mechanic that no one else in Smash Bros. offers.Why do people like Lucario so much?
Lucario or Zoroark?I don't like his design.
The winner of the last poll was Scizor, I'd say having a cool design and being a great Pokken fighter helped. Heracross was definitely close though as the two were constantly fighting for that top spot. As for Wobbuffet, he was lucky to have beaten Ampharos.
Next up is likely the last Gen 2 poll before we move on to Gen 3. Your picks are Tyranitar, Hitmontop, Ursaring, and Slowking.
There was a problem fetching the tweet
Something tells me that I need a better sleep schedule.