I’ve played the last few Kirby titles and still don’t think Bandanna Dee is as much of “the hottest new character” like a lot of people are making him out to be.
I previously said it (like 100 pages ago at this point) but Bandanna Dee is, like Ashley and Mimikyu were, characters that I think are given way too much likelihood. Thing is, a lot of people are afraid to say differently from the majority because they get more or less well...shot down.
Like hey, if you like the character that’s great. I don’t think it’s a bad thing to actively support Bandanna Dee, and if you support him I hope you get what you’d like to see.
However, there’s quite the difference in outlook on the character if some are considering him on par with a major character from a major series like Mario or Zelda. He isn’t close to Luigi. He’s probably even further from Zelda, the princess who the series is named after.
He’s the Player 4 character. In Mario games with a similar formula to Kirby, the Player 4 is typically a Toad, whether it’s a blue one or the traditional red one. If you want to look at an equivalent standout character, then you could maybe look at Captain Toad? Then again, Captain Toad has a game of his own but never was a P4 character.
I don’t know, I really just think Bandanna Dee is considered a “likely” pick because of how bad people want him and not because he actually stands out. I could be wrong, but even after playing games he stars in over the last few years, I don’t get why people think he’s this dude who absolutely needs to be in Smash.