TheLastJinjo
Banned via Warnings
Explain why they came back.Then explain why Pichu, Dr. Mario, Roy, Young Link, Lucas and Wolf were cut.
Last edited:
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Explain why they came back.Then explain why Pichu, Dr. Mario, Roy, Young Link, Lucas and Wolf were cut.
Only 3 of them came backExplain why they came back.
And two new ones were added. So if Lucas was cut for being a "clone", why did Sakurai add Lucina and Dark Pit?Only 3 of them came back
I didn't realize all the clones were the same character. I guess Clone wasn't cut because Clone was added. Makes sense. Good argument.And two new ones were added. So if Lucas was cut for being a "clone", why did Sakurai add Lucina and Dark Pit?
That was the ****ing point I was making. They're NOT all the same character. He's the one who grouped them all in the same group.I didn't realize all the clones were the same character.
Because they weren't even planned as clones. They were initially planned as costumes like Alph and the koopalings but due to a little extra development time, he had the time to upgrade them.And two new ones were added. So if Lucas was cut for being a "clone", why did Sakurai add Lucina and Dark Pit?
I have no idea what you are even saying to be honest.And two new ones were added. So if Lucas was cut for being a "clone", why did Sakurai add Lucina and Dark Pit?
Lucas is not a clone. But, he is a Japan Only character from a less than popular series. So that might have something to do with it.
That's why he was cut as apposed to Toon Link. Toon Link was a semi-clone and he wasn't cut. So there's more to it than that.
Exactly my thoughts.I didn't realize all the clones were the same character. I guess Clone wasn't cut because Clone was added. Makes sense. Good argument.
That's...an interesting way to describe Pauline's situation.Being honest, I feel like Pauline is being treated more as that one disappointing child neither parents care about and insist that she got most of her genes from either her mother's or father's side just to reduce as much association with themselved in here sometimes.....
The ten most likely? Dang, ten is a lot to cut, even for me. I'll give it a shot though.If ten smash characters had to be cut, who do think are most likely to be cut?
3 clones
3 miis (3in1movesets to make, heavily tied to customisation, shoddy future on Switch)
Cloud (third party)
Corrin (big backlash, comes from series with )
Bowser Jr (almost didn't make it, already a lot of Mario characters)
Lucas or Roy again?
Clones are a topic of debate. One argument is, "Clones are easy additions that take no time to include," while the other argument is, "Yeah, but look at past cuts. Newcomers and clones are always the first to go."Does being a clone make you a greater risk for being cut? Maybe, if they aren't popular, but seeing how they're so low effort, and make peeps happy, seems like one of the safer choices to expect. then again, clones have been cut before so idk.
I don't care for clones, but not because I think they're hurting the chances of other fighters. Whenever I beat a Roy online, what does he do? He usually switches to Marth or Lucina to see if the outcome changes. Whenever I beat a Dark Pit who lost because he relied on spamming that stupid Electroshock Arm move, what's his next move? He switches to Pit and starts spamming Upperdash Arm. Every character I main has literally no hope of getting a clone character, so that means I have to either work harder to add more characters to my arsenal, or cave in and pick a character with a clone. Clone characters are a HUGE privilege that people often take advantage of. Perhaps it's my own fault for not choosing characters who have similar movesets, but I'm determined to keep using the characters I have right now. If clone characters must exist, then I'd like for Sakurai to make them play very differently from the original, like Wolf and Lucas do.Here is my thoughts of clones. People hate on them too much. Sure they have a copied move-set, but they are just an add-in. Not ruining any potential Smash fighters. Plus, did not you want Lucina in Smash you Fire Emblem fans?
Bless you for this post. It is great to know that others believe she has a high chance of returning.How people consider Bayonetta a character that is in danger of being cut?
She was the ballot winner and she is getting another Nintendo exclusive game, she is also popular in the competitive scene and one of the most unique characters in the roster...
Lucina and Dark Pit are explained by the same reason Dr. Mario came back. Planned as alternative costumes, but during late development Sakurai felt they'd be more faithful as separate characters, not only does the fact that these 2 characters feel very samey unlike other clones in the franchise support this, but Sakurai himself said it in a Famitsu columnAnd two new ones were added. So if Lucas was cut for being a "clone", why did Sakurai add Lucina and Dark Pit?
Lucas is not a clone. But, he is a Japan Only character from a less than popular series. So that might have something to do with it.
That's why he was cut as apposed to Toon Link. Toon Link was a semi-clone and he wasn't cut. So there's more to it than that.
I do.How people consider Bayonetta a character that is in danger of being cut?
Captain Toad would honestly be forced. I see Sakurai doing something clever with a Mario newcomer. If we're down to Toad, Paper Mario might as well be made playable.Really. You're telling me we would be having this converstion, and you would be taken seriously, if she wasn't in Odyssey? It's the only reason she's slightly likely. And I would argue that Pauline is equally as iconic as Dixie Kong (Not that iconic). But she probably isn't fighting that battle. And I think [Captian] Toad is far more likely
Not just that, but Captain Toad is actually less of an icon than a normal plain Toad. If Sakurai wants to go that route, he should just make a generic Toad into newcomer and let Captain Toad be an alt.Captain Toad would honestly be forced. I see Sakurai doing something clever with a Mario newcomer. If we're down to Toad, Paper Mario might as well be made playable.
I don't know what's funnier, implying Paper Mario wouldn't be a fun choice or the idea one single aspect can be forced in a glorified commercial for video games. EVERYTHING is forced as everything's had lots of care put into it, been planned and made.Captain Toad would honestly be forced. I see Sakurai doing something clever with a Mario newcomer. If we're down to Toad, Paper Mario might as well be made playable.
If Dark Pit got made into his own separate character because of the Great Sacred Treasures final smash, Captain Toad wouldn't be a costumeNot just that, but Captain Toad is actually less of an icon than a normal plain Toad. If Sakurai wants to go that route, he should just make the generic Toad a newcomer and let Captain Toad be an alt.
And yet Alph, another character who shares all of the same traits as someone else, got added as an alt.I don't know what's funnier, implying Paper Mario wouldn't be a fun choice or the idea one single aspect can be forced in a glorified commercial for video games. EVERYTHING is forced as everything's had lots of care put into it, been planned and made.
If Dark Pit got made into his own separate character because of the Great Sacred Treasures final smash, Captain Toad wouldn't be a costume
1: People found Rock Pikmin in the game's files, suggesting Alph was intended to get changed too, but the changes were done pretty late in development and Alph just didn't have enough development timeAnd yet Alph, another character who shares all of the same traits as someone else, got added as an alt.
Captain Toad doesn't have a special ability or talent that any other normal Toad could do just as well. Sakurai can do whatever he wants, but I see no reason for him to go out of his way to make Captain Toad a separate character from a normal Toad.
Well he does have one "ability" to work with.Captain Toad doesn't have a special ability or talent that any other normal Toad could do just as well. Sakurai can do whatever he wants, but I see no reason for him to go out of his way to make Captain Toad a separate character from a normal Toad.
But Captain Toad does offer more of a unique potential move-set and abilities. ( Pickaxe, mining stuff, vegetables, etc ). Like what will they do with his backpack? Will he have the lowest jump in the game?Not just that, but Captain Toad is actually less of an icon than a normal plain Toad. If Sakurai wants to go that route, he should just make a generic Toad into newcomer and let Captain Toad be an alt.
I mean to be honest I'd rather have a moveset centered around Mario power-ups and items than something based on Captain Toad: Treasure Tracker.But Captain Toad does offer more of a unique potential move-set and abilities. ( Pickaxe, mining stuff, vegetables, etc ). Like what will they do with his backpack? Will he have the lowest jump in the game?
And would be awful, having no air game at all. Say Captain Toad can have the best ground game, but that would make no sense at all. A character who can not jump would be very limiting and not fun to play, so I disagree with having a character who can not jump.A character that can't jump would be pretty unique.
Don't we already have Little Mac?A character that can't jump would be pretty unique.
The only problem is, a fighter has to be able to jump if he/she wants to recover. If Captain Toad is unable to jump, he's immediately at a serious disadvantage, and there are a good number of stages where jumping is mandatory to get around.A character that can't jump would be pretty unique.
Really? Because then you're kinda tripping over yourself, as using an examples of how there is basically a revolving door of clones from game to game is not a point in your argument's favour.That was the ****ing point I was making. They're NOT all the same character. He's the one who grouped them all in the same group.
It isn't even an issue, becauseIn all honesty wouldn't making Captain Toad the smallest heavyweight fighter AND giving him low jump height be enough to work around the "Captain Toad can't jump" issue?
No jump doesn't mean no Up-B, plus that implies enough thought is put into that. Mac can't reach the Duck Hunt tree easily eitherThe only problem is, a fighter has to be able to jump if he/she wants to recover. If Captain Toad is unable to jump, he's immediately at a serious disadvantage, and there are a good number of stages where jumping is mandatory to get around.
Lucina and Dark Pit are easy cuts. Dr. Mario could be lumped together with them.If ten smash characters had to be cut, who do think are most likely to be cut?
I always imagined Raichu playing much like N64's Pikachu. Would be ideal to bring back Pikachu's old N Air, B Air and say, Forward Throw. I'd love an addition like this.A popular alternate form of the company's mascot and a requested return. No real downside to adding him in a port. He's not hated by Pokemon fans. Just pissy Smash fans.
Personally I'd love to see Raichu more than anything though.
While I do wholeheartedly support Toad also, he's held back by being a character without a definitive identity in a lot of games. (Is the Blue Toad from SMB2 and SM3DW Toad, or is that a different Toad?) Captain Toad does not have this issue, and is quickly becoming as prevalent as the Toad character before him.Honestly I'd rather have normal Toad than Captain Toad.
To me, adding captain toad instead of Toad would be something like adding Dr. Mario in the roster but not Mario.
Yo, question, why hating on Rare's creation of Donkey Kong Country but name yourself after the collectable characters in Banjo-Kazooie?No. Anyone who's played Donkey Kong is familiar with Pauline. She's the ORIGINAL damsel. She's definitely more familiar than Ice Climbers or Mr. Game & Watch, that's for sure. You shouldn't knock a character for being retro or not having a name. And generic is subjective. I could say Donkey Kong
She's literally one of the main cast members of DONKEY KONG. So yeah, I personally think she is more historically significant than FUNKY Kong.
And I'm not saying that debuting as Rare characters makes them any less Nintendo, especially since they are in plenty of post Rare Nintendo games, but I think Donkey Kong and Diddy are sufficient enough that we can reel it back in to the characters that were created by Nintendo.
I think anyone else from Donkey Kong Country is just going overboard. Or at the very least unnecessary. ESPECIALLY when we're talking about King K. Rool, Funky, and Cranky. I don't think they hold a candle to Pauline.
Edit: Yes, I'm aware there was a damsel in Sheriff, Swampasaur
Because it's possible to like one thing but not the other thing from the same guy? Metroid Other M and Samus Returns had the same director after allYo, question, why hating on Rare's creation of Donkey Kong Country but name yourself after the collectable characters in Banjo-Kazooie?
I've said this before, but why is this an issue? We don't need a definitive Yoshi or Pikachu or Charizard in Smash, what makes Toad special?While I do wholeheartedly support Toad also, he's held back by being a character without a definitive identity in a lot of games. (Is the Blue Toad from SMB2 and SM3DW Toad, or is that a different Toad?) Captain Toad does not have this issue, and is quickly becoming as prevalent as the Toad character before him.