Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
lol that is trueWell you're about ten years too late to find anyone who'll argue against you.
Dark Samus is the first American made character in Smash. There's no rule saying it can't happen. Don't put those random barriers up.I think it's funny that everyone is predicting the upcoming 3rd party characters (if we get any) to be from American franchises, even though every playable character in Smash is from Japanese franchises. Shadow makes sense to be a 3rd party playable character and so does Lloyd from Tales of and Heihachi from Tekken, but not Banjo and Kazooie, Crash, or Steve from Minecraft. But that's just my opinion. I don't think we'll get any American franchise reps as playable characters in this game.
We have Ditto though.This would be amazing. Unfortunately I'm not sure how realistic it is due to technical challenges
The Ditto Pokeball effectively adds an additional character to the fight, so it could work as long as the game is strict about how many cherry clones and Ditto it allows to exist at the same time.This would be amazing. Unfortunately I'm not sure how realistic it is due to technical challenges
On Wii Fit Studio with the mirror reflections.8-Player Smash Ice Climbers Ditto Double Cherry.
I’d probably style it after his Japanese artwork by his original designer Naoto Oshima:
For that one guy, you know who you are.
As I said:Unfortunately, that argument doesn't work in this case. Ivysaur was added due to Sakurai wanting to represent the three stages of evolution through the trainer, and Gen 1 has a special excuse to be included in Brawl - nostalgia. All three of the original starters are essentially household names for most of Smash's audience, and ergo, Ivysaur isn't a "random lol off the wall" pick. One of the Bulbasaur line would've been included on the Trainer regardless. Same for Squirtle and Charmander's lines.
Fair point, but isn't there a limit on number of Pokeballs allowed to be a active at once (3, right?)? Although now that I'm mentioning it, there's nothing stopping them from just doing the same with Double Cherry.We have Ditto though.
I'm just gonna bold Pichu's, laugh over that, and think about the rest of this.I actually just remembered... there was that official Pokémon popularity poll a while ago (the "Pokémon General Election 720", the Japanese Popularity poll where Simisear got dead last).
Greninja was #1
Pikachu was #4
Charizard was #9
Mewtwo was #11
Lucario was #15
Jigglypuff was #49
Pichu was #69
Squirtle and Ivysaur didn't make the top 100.
Genesect was #5, Meloetta was #10, Eevee was #12, Gengar was #35. Gardevoir was #38, Blaziken was #45, Sceptile was #61, Meowth was #82.
458 out of 720.Where was Gothitelle?
I think the fact that Jigglypuff was the 49th most popular Pokémon in Japan during the end of Gen VI is very interesting. Considering how we say Jiggs is irrelevant and unpopular when talking about Smash.I'm just gonna bold Pichu's, laugh over that, and think about the rest of this.
Also brb, gonna take a hard look at some of those polls.
I thought Diddy Kong was the first American-made character. But I'm talking about American franchises, not American-made characters. Even though Dark Samus is made by an American, Metroid is still a Japanese franchise, right?Dark Samus is the first American made character in Smash. There's no rule saying it can't happen. Don't put those random barriers up.
Diddy Kong would like a word with you.Dark Samus is the first American made character in Smash.
Diddy is the first non-Japanese character. Dark Samus is second. K Rool is third.I thought Diddy Kong was the first American-made character. But I'm talking about American franchises, not American-made characters. Even though Dark Samus is made by an American, Metroid is still a Japanese franchise, right?
Clearly an incredibly popular Pokemon, put that thing in Smash right away!458 out of 720.
I believe he was made by a British company.Diddy Kong would like a word with you.
Diddy is British.Diddy Kong would like a word with you.
Diddy I think is technically UK? Same with K. Rool as that's where Rare was I believe. Shovel Knight just got represented in Smash as an Assist. An Indie character made it in Smash. Banjo would be UK too since Rare made em as well. Nintendo is a Japanese company, so of course almost all of the characters would have originated from Japan.I thought Diddy Kong was the first American-made character. But I'm talking about American franchises, not American-made characters. Even though Dark Samus is made by an American, Metroid is still a Japanese franchise, right?
I thought Diddy Kong was the first American-made character. But I'm talking about American franchises, not American-made characters. Even though Dark Samus is made by an American, Metroid is still a Japanese franchise, right?
Diddy Kong (also K. Rool) is a British creation (Rare is a British Game Development company).Diddy Kong would like a word with you.
That's pretty cool. But all the playable characters are from Japanese franchises, and I don't think that's going to change for a whileDiddy is the first non-Japanese character. Dark Samus is second. K Rool is third.
Diddy's a brit, mate.Diddy Kong would like a word with you.
Just to be a contrarian, wasn't Diddy supposed to be DK Jr when he was conceived? So he's more of a soft-reboot of a Japanese character (but really Diddy is from Rare which is from UK, so saying Dark Samus is first American character is correct)Diddy is the first non-Japanese character. Dark Samus is second. K Rool is third.
You're missing the key points here.As I said:
"he made Ivysaur a playable character in Brawl when gen 1 wasn't the relevant gen and when it's not remotely a popular pokemon nor ever thought of by anyone as a Smash-viable character, yet chose it because it fitted a theme he was going for (a Pokemon Trainer character that only used gen 1 starters and had three pokemon that were each in different stagees of evolution, and it just happened to be the line that was left with a middle evolution slot)."
Ivysaur was a very lucky inclusion and seemingly random on its own that no one would ever be taking seriously as a Smash character if it wasn't made playable in Brawl, but made it in because it fit a preconceived idea of Sakurai's. This would be like how the Gothielle Echo could happen, where Sakurai wants to add playable representation for both gen 3 and 5, and thus needs a popular unique pokemon from one of those gens that people would like as a Smash character while having an Echo in the opposite gen that could feasibly work.
I have absolutely no idea if he was or not. All I know is that Cranky Kong is old DK and current DK (old DK Jr.) has a picture of his old man in all of his 8-bit glory in his House in the trailer.Just to be a contrarian, wasn't Diddy supposed to be DK Jr when he was conceived? So he's more of a soft-reboot of a Japanese character (but really Diddy is from Rare which is from UK, so saying Dark Samus is first American character is correct)
I think it's funny that everyone is predicting the upcoming 3rd party characters (if we get any) to be from American franchises, even though every playable character in Smash is from Japanese franchises. Shadow makes sense to be a 3rd party playable character and so does Lloyd from Tales of and Heihachi from Tekken, but not Banjo and Kazooie, Crash, or Steve from Minecraft. But that's just my opinion. I don't think we'll get any American franchise reps as playable characters in this game.
To be fair, Sakurai has made a statement about third-parties:Dark Samus is the first American made character in Smash. There's no rule saying it can't happen. Don't put those random barriers up.
There is some basis for the statement as it pertains to third party characters.Final Fantasy (FF below) is one of the few uniquely Japanese game series revered by players around the world. I think fans across the globe have hoped a character from one of those series would appear in Smash, so it was only a matter of time. At the same time, there are only so many big-name titles we can work with at this point—mainly because we’ve covered most of those bases. Aside from the major globally-recognized franchises already featured in Smash, there really aren’t that many left.
Story of my life dude.I tried to make a funny, but it turns out, I was the funny all along...
I would guess they'd be like "oh, neat" with Dark Samus. Metroid isn't that big over there and I think the Prime series even less so.Do we know how most Japanese Smash fans reacted to the direct? Especially Dark Samus
It took a hell of a lot of digging to find. Only reason I even spotted it was because of Exeggutor and Mr. Mime being close to it.Clearly an incredibly popular Pokemon, put that thing in Smash right away!
Pikachu, Charizard, Lucario and Greninja? WHO CARES? We've got Gothitelle!
Current DK being DK Jr? Isn't he like the third DK?I have absolutely no idea if he was or not. All I know is that Cranky Kong is old DK and current DK (old DK Jr.) has a picture of his old man in all of his 8-bit glory in his House in the trailer.
Even though Cloud is still there, FF only has two songs for their only stage compared to the other 3rd parties having 10+ songs and two stages (only for the case of Sanic and possibly/hopefully Pac-Man). Either SE is wanting more payment for extra songs in Smash, there’s copyright issues, or they only think two songs are all that’s needed)I mean, Cloud's there. The ball's already there, and Nintendo would have to pay for any character licenses anyway, so I don't see what the problem is... it's Final Fantasy, everything this franchise touches is guaranteed to sell anyway.
So he's saying they're running out of big franchises and may have to start using characters from smaller franchises as playable in the future?To be fair, Sakurai has made a statement about third-parties:
There is some basis for the statement as it pertains to third party characters.
Story of my life dude.
I didn't really see anything in that quote that told me no non Japanese third parties?There is some basis for the statement as it pertains to third party characters.