From Sakurai's exact quote on Villager in Brawl:
“In fact, there was even a point where in the planning stages of the previous game, “Super Smash Bros. Brawl,” I removed the Villager, the protagonist of Animal Crossing, from consideration because he wasn’t suited for battle."
Sakurai viewed Villager with the same lens of "too peaceful", regardless of "blank slate personality".
That can be interpreted too many ways to make it clear what he meant.
But yeah, I forget he wasn't referring to the series. Thanks for the correction.
Doesn't really do anything for Isabelle either way, as Smash alone already shows her to dislike getting into battle. So who knows what'll happen. Regardless, it's a bad idea to consider her a safe bet instead of a viable option. Especially if we're trying to use non-AC games to justify the idea "she would battle" when they're non-canon appearances in every way for her.
So wait, did Vergeben say if Isabelle was unique or an echo? If she's unique that will kind of let my hopes down a bit TBH.
He didn't say at all. However, she's probably unique if she's playable.
Lumas can't really die in Smash, though.
Well, she still lets them get hurt. But yeah, this is the only thing remotely against her established personality at best. Her willingness to fight isn't established as "would or would not" either way. Uncomparable to Isabelle for that reason alone.
So why does literally any of that matter again? After all, if you can just dismiss refutations that go against your point, so can I.
Isabelle doesn't like argumentative confrontation. Never is it shown in-game that she's a literal pacifist for what is, essentially, a contact sport. A series as big and character-filled as Animal Crossing should not be stuck to one character, plain and simple.
Smash is not a contact sport. It's a fighting game. Smash already has a personality for her, which is a "won't fight". And it can be stuck as one character just fine, since the point of playing it is to collect items and such. In fact, only legit thing missing is Fishing at this point that is relevant. We have building houses via the Final Smash.
Show me where Rosalina battled in the three games she appeared in before the roster was decided. Only Mario Kart Wii counts, if any, and if it works for her, it works for Isabelle.
You aren't listening at all, are you? She would fight because it's a series where every character would fight. That was the point, no more no less. Don't try to act like I said or implied anything else. In addition, every Mario game happens due to Miyamoto's own statements. Rosalina in her own series has no issues battling. This is why her fighting isn't illogical in Smash. Don't cherrypick a Guest character because it fits your bad analogy. Mario Kart is a
Mario game. It does not work for Isabelle because it's a non-canon appearance. The analogy will never work as long as you ignore the hard fact that Isabelle does not fight in her own series. If she starts taking real action in her own series, you will start having a real point. Till then, the analogy completely fails. Mario Kart Guests do not inherently reflect the character who are just fun appearances. If they aren't connected to the Mario series, they do not inherently reflect the personality that exists from their own legit series. Now if you want to keep with the argument that Isabelle isn't really a pacifist, that's fair. The Mario Kart analogy will still be wrong because it's not an Animal Crossing game regardless.
Is this seriously the argument you've resorted to? To get Isabelle to be able to literally blow up literal infants with literal bombs, the Mario Kart team would need permission from the Animal Crossing team to do so. And guess what? They allowed it. The same can, and will, be done for Smash. Something doesn't arbitrarily not count because you decide it doesn't. Your arguments are beyond irrelevant.
I didn't realize a non-Mario character should be counted as her canon personality despite not acting like that in her real games. Yeah, it's the correct argument to use on why MK is a terrible argument to begin with. Because it's correct. Mario characters don't have highly established personalities in order to justify them being in any kind of game(Rosalina is the first and only one with any major personality, and Miyamoto was not a fan of it, even reducing her role in Galaxy 2 just because he hates major story stuff in Mario games. Dumb, but eh). It's why he intentionally considers Mario characters akin to actors as well, so they can do anything he wants them to. Mario can be a villain. Peach can be a protagonist. Rosalina doesn't have to be passive at all. Bowser can be a hero. Luigi doesn't always have to be a coward. And so on. It's intentional. Any character in MK that has no strict connection to the Mario universe is irrelevant because unless they directly act like their own games, they're simply inaccurate appearances that only exist as Guests. This is the issue with pretending Isabelle should get in because of MK. It's pretending she's accurate personality-wise when it goes against her established one instead. The funny part is Smash actually does the opposite, directly reflecting her "will avoid fighting" personality that many think she has(though that may not be 100% accurate, as you do have a point that isn't beyond clear if she's a pacifist or not. That I agree with. Smash goes against your points, ironically).