SpiralGalaxies
Smash Lord
I...would not call Super Mario RPG particularly obscure.I don't know why so many people are requesting Geno. He only appeared in an obscure SNES game.
also thanks for the responses about geno everyone!
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I...would not call Super Mario RPG particularly obscure.I don't know why so many people are requesting Geno. He only appeared in an obscure SNES game.
He supposedly considered him for Brawl and then he never added him in Smash 4. I wonder why?I mean Sakurai literally considered him previously and thats more you can say than most of the characters we all request on here
Oh woe is me. Disagreeing that Geno is some sort of gaming icon is a perfectly acceptable counter. Because I don't believe that's true.And you'd be completely offbase and the only one being disrespectful, but go off I guess.
And I don't feel bad for saying you are offbase, because you can't even COUNTER it. You simply just say you disagree.
Which shows to me all I need to know.
His unique design is probably what helped him, a puppet with gun arms that turns into a cannon? That could be cool for SmashI don't know why so many people are requesting Geno. He only appeared in an obscure SNES game.
One that Sakurai has acknowledged. Nintendo themselves has acknowledge on the Virtual Console and SNES Mini.I don't know why so many people are requesting Geno. He only appeared in an obscure SNES game.
I meant in a more realistic, what-Nintendo-is-actually-planning kind of way, if you will. We all know Nintendo doesn't go by what leakers say, well, most of the time, so they are probably going to announce a Direct some time other than what the leakers say. Plus, from what I remember, official Directs that don't focus on just one or two games, is not a mini Direct, etc. have not been as common as they were before Iwata died, and I have doubts that a Direct will happen soon after the month in which E3 has happened. Being desperate is not exactly being realistic, so unless there is another good reason why they say July, I think we're gonna wait until August or September before we get anything from Nintendo.They kind of do. People are desperate for a reveal, therefore wannabe "leakers" play off of this by "leaking" reveals coming up soon in an attempt to make people get their hopes up.
Mario is Nintendo's only flagship franchise. Nintendo doesn't even make the Pokemon games, although they have partial ownership of the IP.You can't overrepresent Mario or Pokemon.
It's physically impossible. They're the flagship Nintendo franchises. There could be 14 reps each for each franchise in a future game and that'd still be fine.
It'd be like complaining about seeing Mickey Mouse and Disney princesses in a Disney theme park. No **** there's a lot of them there. That's what Disney/Nintendo makes a lot of their bread and butter off of.
Only about 1% of all Pokemon are playable. Pokemon is pretty underrepresented.You can't overrepresent Mario or Pokemon.
It's physically impossible. They're the flagship Nintendo franchises. There could be 14 reps each for each franchise in a future game and that'd still be fine.
It'd be like complaining about seeing Mickey Mouse and Disney princesses in a Disney theme park. No **** there's a lot of them there. That's what Disney/Nintendo makes a lot of their bread and butter off of.
Claiming Pokemon isn't one of the most successfull and marketable franchises period would be flat out wrong too thoughMario is Nintendo's only flagship franchise. Nintendo doesn't even make the Pokemon games, although they have partial ownership of the IP.
798 newcomers in Ultimate, and they're all Pokemon.Only about 1% of all Pokemon are playable. Pokemon is pretty underrepresented.
/s
Hairsplitting at it's finest.Mario is Nintendo's only flagship franchise. Nintendo doesn't even make the Pokemon games, although they have partial ownership of the IP.
I never said that. Pokemon is heavily successful, but it should be treated to the level of Zelda and Fire Emblem. 9 characters is too much for one series, in my opinion.Claiming Pokemon isn't one of the most successfull and marketable franchises period would be flat out wrong too though
You should really read this, specifically the part about Geno. From Sakurai:No. It's really not.
Irrelevant.
Uh, no. The blockade is he's irrelevant.
How is it a Ridley situation? Last time a checked Ridley was an antagonist from a highly popular video game franchise who appeared in numerous games.
Once again, irrelevant.
Twice again, i-re-le-vant.
How old was Sheik when she was added in Smash? 4 years old? Plus she was attached to Zelda because she IS Zelda. Plus, she's a three time veteran.
So, thrice again, irrelevant.
You tell me! Because Sakurai clearly said he wanted him in Smash 4 and had to be content with the Mii Fighter costume.He supposedly considered him for Brawl and then he never added him in Smash 4. I wonder why?
How many non-playable characters have even been stated by Sakurai to be a good fit for Smash? That is something noteworthy.You should really read this, specifically the part about Geno. From Sakurai:
—What led you to decide to make a Geno costume after all this time?
Sakurai: To tell the truth, it’s because I wanted Geno to be a playable character. He has a gun for a hand, and I think he fits in really well with Smash. During Brawl, I thought it would be great if I could add him, but in the end it didn’t become a reality.
—Because of that, you added him as a Mii Costume this time?
Sakurai: That’s right. He’s very popular. When talking about older characters, Geno always gets a lot of requests. He didn’t appear as a fighter, but I was able to achieve something kind of close to that as a Mii Costume.
When Geno got official approval of his popularity from the guy who decides the roster, as well as an outright statement about a desire to make him playable since Brawl, all right before Ultimate's project plan proposal occurred, you can't just pass Geno off anymore as an irrelevant internet fad. I used to be a big Geno detractor who spouted the typical arguments against him, but in the end Sakurai's word is what matters, and the big question against Geno is if he can be licensed out from SquareEnix, not if he's "deserving" or "relevant enough".
We know. Because every time someone suggests an extra Pokemon you say this. No offence, but your opinion isn't an actual argument. Zelda's a popular franchise but it is nowhere near Pokemon's Smash Hit status. Hell, Fire Emblem wishes it could be nearly as popular, any franchise wishes it wasI never said that. Pokemon is heavily successful, but it should be treated to the level of Zelda and Fire Emblem. 9 characters is too much for one series, in my opinion.
I am now a Politoed main798 newcomers in Ultimate, and they're all Pokemon.
Can't wait to main Castform.798 newcomers in Ultimate, and they're all Pokemon.
That's a weird way to spell "the mother of all Mario RPGs"I don't know why so many people are requesting Geno. He only appeared in an obscure SNES game.
Okay, I get it, you're just negative hahaOne thing I'm noticing is there's now all these support threads for random SM Pokemon who are never getting in.
Said game never got a European release, and there are more relevant Square characters to choose from.That's a weird way to spell "the mother of all Mario RPGs"
Geno's gonna need to do better than that. Plenty of long requested characters and originally considered like him are currently assist trophies in Super Smash Bros Ultimate.One that Sakurai has acknowledged. Nintendo themselves has acknowledge on the Virtual Console and SNES Mini.
Etc.
It's an ''obscure" game that has a huge cult following to the point one of the characters from it has been one of the longest standing fan request for Smash Brothers alongside Ridley and K. Rool. Main villains from big Nintendo franchises.
That's god damn incredible. I don't care what you say. That is nothing short of amazing and a ''Little Engine That Could" type deal.
Mario, then Pokémon, and then ZeldaMario is Nintendo's only flagship franchise. Nintendo doesn't even make the Pokemon games, although they have partial ownership of the IP.
Pokémon is bigger than those two series, and jokes on you they only have 7 playable characters in Smash (Pokémon Trainer counts as one, like how Dark Pit and Lucina count as one character for Pit and Marth instead of having their own number)I never said that. Pokemon is heavily successful, but it should be treated to the level of Zelda and Fire Emblem. 9 characters is too much for one series, in my opinion.
Except Mario, cause he don’t wanna remember the dark times he went through through his movie days (but gaming wise only Mario #1, while Pokémon is #1 media wise)We know. Because every time someone suggests an extra Pokemon you say this. No offence, but your opinion isn't an actual argument. Zelda's a popular franchise but it is nowhere near Pokemon's Smash Hit status. Hell, Fire Emblem wishes it could be nearly as popular, any franchise wishes it was
You should’ve seen him during the pre-Ridley in Ultimate daysOkay, I get it, you're just negative haha
Well when you put it like that suddenly my Melee shipping fanfic idea sounds way squickier.How old was Sheik when she was added in Smash? 4 years old?
I'll just counterpick Golduck. Castform has such a bad Golduck matchup because Cloud Nine prevents Castform from using its weather moves.Can't wait to main Castform.
Wow, you're just a ray of sunshine huh?One thing I'm noticing is there's now all these support threads for random SM Pokemon who are never getting in.
In that case, who do you think will get in?Not all the newcomers are going to be fan favorites. Also, I have given up my negativity towards Pokemon newcomers.
"Cult Following"Geno's gonna need to do better than that. Plenty of long requested characters and originally considered like him are currently assist trophies in Super Smash Bros Ultimate.
The difference between Ridley being requested and Geno being requested is that Ridley still works without requiring a cult following on the internet. Plenty of casual fans of Metroid and Super Smash Bros know who he is.
The reason his inclusion is disrespectful is that all of the other characters have actually done something to earn their inclusion. If Geno is viable, than literally any Nintendo character in existence is as long the following is vocal enough.
I'd prefer newcomers have some sort of rhyme and reason and I have every right to feel that way. I'm not gonna throw a fit if he gets in, and I won't object to it even slightly if he is announced as DLC. I'd probably be excited. But, it would be remarkably disappointing if he was chosen in the base game among so many other better options available.
A fan base in support of someone like Rex, shouldn't be shafted in favor of a cult following for a character like Geno.
I don't think anyone has been poo-pooing on rayman though? At least not in this thread, he's generally regarded pretty positively.Everyone is backing Geno now for his popularity which is fair but why have we been poo pooing on Rayman when he has everything going for him that Geno does. I'll say this with 100% confidence: Rayman performed better than any other third party in the ballot. Banjo may have given him a run for his money but I think ArtsyOmni's stunt eventually led to a burst in popularity for Rayman.
Super Mario RPG got a European release on the Wii Virtual Console. Just saying.Said game never got a European release, and there are more relevant Square characters to choose from.
And what's the problem with that? The thing with Pokemon is that every Pokemon is loved by someone out there and people can very easily want to see their favourite in a game they're looking forward toOne thing I'm noticing is there's now all these support threads for random SM Pokemon who are never getting in.
Decidueye, Incineroar, Mimikyu, Lycanroc, or some Gen 8 Pokemon as DLC, but I doubt the latter is going to happen.
In that case, who do you think will get in?
I'm sorry but what's really disrespectful is completely making fun of and going against a character that would make lots of people very happy. Really, I don't get why people are so butt hurt about characters they don't like getting in, at least in terms of video game characters. Like, you're fully allowed to not want a character, but don't ask for them to not be included. Do people not realize that you could, I dunno... Not play that character if you don't like them?I'm all for fan service until it sinks to the low of including a completely random character from a completely random game. Not even a protagonist or a classic NES title. Just a random party member from a one-off Mario RPG who never appeared again.
I've never ever actively wanted a character to NOT be in Smash, but adding Geno is just disrespectful. That's where I draw the line when it comes to fan service.
Well lets see here:Said game never got a European release, and there are more relevant Square characters to choose from.