Pacack
Super Pac-Fan
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2013
- Messages
- 8,066
- Location
- US (Mountain Time, -7 Hours)
- NNID
- Pacack
- 3DS FC
- 0688-5284-6845
This is factually inaccurate.Most who played a SNES played DKC as a series, with 1 and 2 becoming some of the best damn platforms in history in the eyes of my generation. (3 a bit less so, but still up there)
The SNES sold 49 million units vs. 9 million units of DKC and ~5 million for DKC2. That's impressive, but is by no means "most" of the SNES userbase.
I won't comment on the cartoon, but DK64 sold 2.3 million, which was good, but significantly less than DKC2.From there, anyone who knew DK went on to see the cartoon, and if not the cartoon, DK64. One of the hypest games at the time. It was EVERYWHERE. You weren't cool if you didn't play it (though some game design has not aged well.)
So, should we include Kamek, Captain Syrup, Medusa, Medeus, and the like just to include a villain from every series in Smash?Put bluntly, K. Rool should have been in since Melee just from a pure hero-to villain perspective. Mario had Bowser. Link had Ganondorft. Pokemon had Mewtwo. It just made sense. DK64 was still fresh back then anyway. All other omissions aside, it was an obvious inclusion that slipped through the Kraks.
K. Rool has merits, absolutely, but he was in no way more deserving than were for Melee.
This alone reveals that you're not looking for facts in this.Believe what you will. It won't change our minds.
Last edited: