Originality
Smash Journeyman
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2015
- Messages
- 422
Here's my pokemon
Last edited:
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Nothing against it at all, but I'm curious about Lunatone being your favorite rock type.I did my pokemon because bored!
View attachment 147210
I always feel like doing it by type skews results, because my top 10 defintely includes more ghosts and fairies, so instead I have to fit them in else where (Like Aegislash and Pumpkaboo). Still fun regardless. And yes I unironically love Jynx, fight me.
I'm really bad at resetera for some dumb reason, so could you link? I wanna read some of the reasoning.
Exactly. People there are just trusting their hometown insider because some kind of stupid internet nationalism. Someone in there even went as far as to call Emily the "most reputable insider", so that's where the resetera anti-Verg talk is coming from. There's literally nothing there we didn't already know, that being Verg's spotty track record. Nothing outright deconfirms him yet.>People in ResetEra are willing to believe Emily Roger.
>She who said Splatoon2 doesn't exist and was a port, Said that Link could change gender and be a Girl in BOTW and said Mario Kart 8 Deluxe is bull****.
As much as Vergeben have a shaky reputation, Emily Roger isn't better at all.
runs on all fours so it can't hold items and dashTo be very honest, I would've considered Lycanroc if it weren't for the fact that two of the three forms are quadrupedal. As popular as the Dusk Form might be, not being able to carry two-handed items without psychic powers or vines can be a rather heavy handicap, especially if the Daybreak happens to return.
At least Midnight Form Lycanroc's bipedal stature enables it to use such items.
Emily said something about him? I didn't see that but that would conflict with what I was assuming (that she saw the roster and saw big names like Snake and Ridley)From what I can see in Resetera, they don't really have concrete evidence to call Verg a liar, also Emily is one of the people shooting down his claims, and she has also developed a history of getting plenty of things wrong while also getting some right. No point in looking into the resetera stuff til they find more solid proof imo. Not saying Verg is legit, but I'm not about to say those with a spotty history really have the ability to call him a liar either.
What did emily say?I read the posts on Resetera. Just seems like people are being skeptical about Vergeben's track record. Nothing we weren't already aware of.
And as for Emily's statement, why are people even tying that into Vergeben's rumor? Pretty sure she said that before Vergeben even made his post about Ridley.
Looks like people's rageboners are proportional to how close we get to E3. Also, to Ridley.The only thing I see there is a bunch of people in denial or very skeptical. Also some of them are basically saying Ridley is "deconfirmed" just because they don't believe Verg. Well guess what, Verg could still be wrong and Ridley could still be in anyways.
This was Emily's response to the Memoryman rumor back in March that claimed she and other insiders hinted at Ridley. This has nothing to do with Vergeben, and Emily is not denying Ridley is in the game.I don't recall saying or teasing anything in public (Twitter, Resetera, etc) about Ridley.
So I have no idea where that's even coming from.
I dunno if its the ridley glasses or what, but you guys seriously overlook how "spotty" his record is. Literally nobody here should have any faith in the man for the many reasons and FACTS mentioned in that thread.Exactly. People there are just trusting their hometown insider because some kind of stupid internet nationalism. Someone in there even went as far as to call Emily the "most reputable insider", so that's where the resetera anti-Verg talk is coming from. There's literally nothing there we didn't already know, that being Verg's spotty track record. Nothing outright deconfirms him yet.
I don't mean Emily said something about him directly, but people on the thread are basically saying anyone but Emily is almost definitely bull****ting even though Emily has been bull****ting an awful lot of the time she leaks something Point is, don't pay any mind to resetera rn. There's nothing to learn over there.Emily said something about him? I didn't see that but that would conflict with what I was assuming (that she saw the roster and saw big names like Snake and Ridley)
But yea totally agree they aren't saying anything new, just harping on the past. I wish people actually discussed how is Konami leak could be false, that's actually a talking point.
I thought everyone here was pretty reasonable about NOT taking this leak too seriously. Most people are skeptical to hopeful.I dunno if its the ridley glasses or what, but you guys seriously overlook how "spotty" his record is. Literally nobody here should have any faith in the man for the many reasons and FACTS mentioned in that thread.
Thats not to say ridley can't get in, but it is to say that this leak shouldn't be taken as gospel, or even held on even level with other leaks. If it's true, cool. Just know that it would bump his right to wrong ratio up to like 20/80.
I've always liked space stuff and specifically had an attachment to moon related mythology. Lunatone fits that, is Psychic which was my favorite type when gen 3 came out and has a really cool design in my oppinion.Nothing against it at all, but I'm curious about Lunatone being your favorite rock type.
Huh? Back in the day, sure, but she's been nailing it for the past year. The Switch specs she wss completely right on, Smash being annouced in a Direct, Pokemon Let's Go being announced in press event, She was the first to allude to this Star Fox Grand Prix, Nvidia being providing the chip for the Switch, Nailing the date and format of the January Direct, among other things. Being an admin on Resetera and now being a game developer herself has given her a lot more weight lately, due to the fact that she knows and has to verify numerous developers.>People in ResetEra are willing to believe Emily Roger.
>She who said Splatoon2 doesn't exist and was a port, Said that Link could change gender and be a Girl in BOTW and said Mario Kart 8 Deluxe is bull****.
As much as Vergeben have a shaky reputation, Emily Roger isn't better at all.
I mean if you read my posts you'll see I directly stated that I'm not saying Verg is legit.I dunno if its the ridley glasses or what, but you guys seriously overlook how "spotty" his record is. Literally nobody here should have any faith in the man for the many reasons and FACTS mentioned in that thread.
Thats not to say ridley can't get in, but it is to say that this leak shouldn't be taken as gospel, or even held on even level with other leaks. If it's true, cool. Just know that it would bump his right to wrong ratio up to like 20/80.
Yes, but no one here believe any leaks. Me I'm just relaying a bunch of Rumors left and right because they usually bring some interesting discussion-I dunno if its the ridley glasses or what, but you guys seriously overlook how "spotty" his record is. Literally nobody here should have any faith in the man for the many reasons and FACTS mentioned in that thread.
Thats not to say ridley can't get in, but it is to say that this leak shouldn't be taken as gospel, or even held on even level with other leaks. If it's true, cool. Just know that it would bump his right to wrong ratio up to like 20/80.
He has a spotty record. But when he gets it right, HE GETS IT RIGHT.I dunno if its the ridley glasses or what, but you guys seriously overlook how "spotty" his record is. Literally nobody here should have any faith in the man for the many reasons and FACTS mentioned in that thread.
Thats not to say ridley can't get in, but it is to say that this leak shouldn't be taken as gospel, or even held on even level with other leaks. If it's true, cool. Just know that it would bump his right to wrong ratio up to like 20/80.
Yeah. Vergeben doesn't have a very good record. I'm going 50/50 with this one.He has a spotty record. But when he gets it right, HE GETS IT RIGHT.
If he is so confident with his source, i think he gets this right.
> implying that she doesn’t have a list at least 5 times bigger than vergeben of things she’s gotten right>People in ResetEra are willing to believe Emily Roger.
>She who said Splatoon2 doesn't exist and was a port, Said that Link could change gender and be a Girl in BOTW and said Mario Kart 8 Deluxe is bull****.
As much as Vergeben have a shaky reputation, Emily Roger isn't better at all.
The Resetera thread is just completely confused lol, people are posting things out of context and are misunderstanding each other like crazy. Nothing has happened by the looks of it, Emily hasn't even said anything, the quotes they're bringing up from her are months old and were in relation to Memoryman going on GameFAQs and saying Emily teased Ridley when she didn't, they're just spinning it as if she's just deconfirmed Vergeben's leak. It's a mess lol.
Nothing at all. She speaks only when necessary, which is smart.Has Emily Rogers said anything that contradicts Vergeben? Last I heard she just said stuff like the roster was surprising and it was supposed to be the "Ultimate Smash Roster"
Which was a 4chan leaks first in April.Pokemon Let's Go being announced in press event,
So we play who have a bigger E-penis?> implying that she doesn’t have a list at least 5 times bigger than vergeben of things she’s gotten right
lol
I mean the fact of the matter is she's gotten things wrong in her time, as has Vergeben. But they've both been right on occasion too, so until something actually deconfirms this leak we shouldn't dismiss it. If you want us to stop talking about the Verg leak, give me solid evidence that its fake. I'm not saying its correct, but I'm not saying its wrong until we know.> implying that she doesn’t have a list at least 5 times bigger than vergeben of things she’s gotten right
lol
Oh I absolutely agree with your point. Neither of them are to be trusted 100%, and both get things wrong all the time. All I was trying to say with my post was that Emily Rogers is definitely a more established leaker. Doesn’t mean she is to be completely trusted.Which was a 4chan leaks first in April.
So we play who have a bigger E-penis?
The fact is that She's getting things AWFULLY wrong when it comes to Nintendo First Party titles.
I'm still waiting on my Smash 4/Splatoon port.
What's good to understand is that people need to be wary of Both Vergeben who have a shaky record and Emily who's not all sunshine and Rainbow too when it comes to Nintendo.
This might be nitpicky, but it’s kinda hard to prove a negative.If you want us to stop talking about the Verg leak, give me solid evidence that its fake.
shoo-in.While interforum wars and shade isn't good at all, their Smash thread have been a mess for the most part. So I wouldn't even pay attention to it.
Yes, but no one here believe any leaks. Me I'm just relaying a bunch of Rumors left and right because they usually bring some interesting discussion-
But no way in hell I believe them, I've been the first one to say so.
Don't trust anything. Don't put yourself into Disappointment and never think any Characters is a shoe in.
Also Emily Roger isn't better at all when it comes to Switch's leaks, I think she's been practically completely wrong from start to end. And got absolutely destroyed by some Anon in 4chan who leaked the whole Switch Presentation in January that she called 100%Bull**** and Thought Mario Odyssey was a launch title.
He's been so adamant on specific details that it won't be hard once E3 hits. His entire leak is based around E3. Point is, nothing has been revealed that deconfirms his leak, and there's even been some evidence come out in favor of at least one of his sources.This might be nitpicky, but it’s kinda hard to prove a negative.
That's just silly! You put your feet in shoes, and you shoo people out!shoo-in.
Just raising awareness. common misspelling.
And to add to this. Smash Bros IS usually a game Leakers are wary to share information on until they're 100% sure of it because it's the Saint Graal of games to leak.He's been so adamant on specific details that it won't be hard once E3 hits. His entire leak is based around E3. Point is, nothing has been revealed that deconfirms his leak, and there's even been some evidence come out in favor of at least one of his sources.
What? The burden of proof falls onto the leaker. It’s not our responsibility to deconfirm it, but for HIM to provide sufficient evidence for it, since he is making the claim.He's been so adamant on specific details that it won't be hard once E3 hits. His entire leak is based around E3. Point is, nothing has been revealed that deconfirms his leak, and there's even been some evidence come out in favor of at least one of his sources.
I just pointlessly correct people about nonsensical idioms, I don't create them. Nobody knows who created them and many of their contexts no longer make sense in modern society, but dammit we use them and hold the to grammatical standards anyways!That's just silly! You put your feet in shoes, and you shoo people out!
I mean maybe, but there are plenty of total BS leaks that come out too. Verg has a history and isn't just some 4chan anon, but his insiders that he gets his info from may just be good liars. We'll find out soon enough thoughAnd to add to this. Smash Bros IS usually a game Leakers are wary to share information on until they're 100% sure of it because it's the Saint Graal of games to leak.
Probably why Emily herself decided to only play it vague.
If Vergeben is wrong on that one. NO ONE will EVER trust him ever again on the internet
I mean he's provided his statements on what is going to happen at E3 and we'll know whether he's wrong or not when E3 hits He said these things would get revealed at E3. We don't really have to go no a witch hunt to find information as to whether he was right or not if these things don't happen.What? The burden of proof falls onto the leaker. It’s not our responsibility to deconfirm it, but for HIM to provide sufficient evidence for it, since he is making the claim.