OK I need to take down these points one by one because holy **** this logic is awful.
A few key differences with those examples:
- Lucario and R.O.B. are heavily associated with video games, which Goku isn't.
- Lucario and R.O.B. are heavily associated with Nintendo, which Goku isn't.
If Nintendo had all odds in their favor and had all the money, licensing, and tools to have Goku playable in
Smash, why the **** would they use a lesser-known video game version of him and not go the full mile and use the version from the anime, which is objectively more known?
Also, a common theme you'll see in this post, the main reason against Goku, and likewise other anime characters, isn't simply because they're "anime characters" and "not video game characters" (or not the whole reason, at least). The issue mainly draws from Nintendo having to jump through so many hoops just to get the rights to him that it isn't worth it.
What does that have to do with anything? Nintendo will still need to go through MUCH more effort to have Goku than a regular guest character like PAC-MAN. The company who owns the character doesn't mean jack **** if they're not even in the same division of media.
Also, why the heck would Goku of all people be a second Namco representative? I can think of at least 10 more characters from the company that would be more suited for a
Smash appearance than him.
Him appearing on Nintendo consoles doesn't matter. His debut is
outside of video games, which means it'll take a LOT more effort than your average fuest character to get him in, which is something I doubt Nintendo would be willing to, or even be
able to do.
Do you have a source on that? Not that it actually matters, since it means jack **** for the reasons above.
For the third time, that doesn't mean a thing. Nintendo appearances, no matter how many he has, mean nothing simply because of his origins as a non-video game character.
BIG LOUD SIGH
Where do I begin with this one? Having games on Nintendo consoles was never a rule to begin with. It was just something made up by fans who didn't want guest characters to branch too far out. Sakurai seemed to have no problem with Cloud, and found him fun to work on, as shown in interviews, and never once mentioned that being on a Nintendo console was a requirement for guest characters. Cloud was certainly a surprise, as many deemed him unlikely thanks to the fanmade arbitrary rules, but he didn't break any mold regardless.
Once again, no matter how many video games the
Dragon Ball franchise has, that doesn't change its origins, which ultimately deem it impossible for
Smash.
No, just because Shonen Jump is a Japanese company doesn't mean it gets a free pass to have characters in
Smash.
PLENTY of companies are stationed in Japan, some completely unrelated to video games or media in general. Would
they have dedicated representation just because they're in Japan?
Lastly, since you seem to be doing research here, I'm surprised you missed how Sakurai
laughed at the idea of Goku during an interview, and mentioned that Mii Fighters could allow players to use non-video game characters such as Goku and SpongeBob SuarePants in the game.
I've said this before and I'll say it again: go play
Super Smash Flash 2 if you want to play as Goku. Heck, last I heard he was among the best characters in the game.