Implying Crash even knows how to spell.The bandicoot is going to change the name to Crash Brothers with a marker or something in the trailer if he gets in.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Implying Crash even knows how to spell.The bandicoot is going to change the name to Crash Brothers with a marker or something in the trailer if he gets in.
Legacy they may have, they are extremely unlikely to both be added to Smash in the same game and revealed at the same time.I can't say Crash and Spyro would be my first picks but their legacy cannot be denied and it would be incredible to have them.
I'm not denying that, I agree completely. Already said I'm still definitely on the side of fake.Legacy they may have, they are extremely unlikely to both be added to Smash in the same game and revealed at the same time.
Especially if the roster was in fact decided back in early 2016, long before both characters' trilogy remakes (which this leak attributes to them) would play any sort of factor.
EDIT:
Crash, I can at least see have a remote possibility at that point in time. But definitely not Spyro.
The Spyro + mushroom memes will be ubiquitous.Another Dragon in Smash, a Purple Dragon at that, instead of Ridley, would be terrible.
If there are two 3rd party newcomers in the game it's likely they'll both be revealed at E3, it's the biggest stage and those are the biggest inclusions, so I don't think it's outlandish that both would be revealed in the same presentation, especially not if they are as closely tied together as Crash and Spyro are.I'd believe this rumor if it said that Crash and Spyro would both be playable in Smash, but both reveals in the span of 40 minutes? I can't see that happening.
Not in the last place because I can't see only three reveals + ICs happening when the game is supposed to release 2018. They gotta show more than that.
Will you stream it if it comes to that?Spyro and Crash.
Are.
Not.
Going.
To be.
In.
Base. Game.
I will. eat. three pairs of boxer shorts if they are.
Clean or flavoured?Spyro and Crash.
Are.
Not.
Going.
To be.
In.
Base. Game.
I will. eat. three pairs of boxer shorts if they are.
This user isn't half-wrong you know.If you pay for the Nintendo Online Service, and owned Cloud in Super Smash Bros. for Wii U and 3DS, you automatically get him again in the new game.
I am definitely with you there. I get that Elma is more well known than your avatar in XCX, but as we know, most series has their main character to be represented in Smash.I'll be a contrarian and say that I believe Cross is more likely than Elma.
I didn't play Xenoblade X, from what I read the story focus on her.
However from the wiki of this game, it seems that Cross can choose from any class that decide the weapon wielded by the character. It gives more moveset potential.
He is also an avatar character, and we got two of them past game (Robin and Villager). While he doesn't have much personality compared to Elma, he is still an important member of your party, since you cannot remove him.
My two cents, since I don't really care about any of them. I am just surprised that Cross is not that much considered.
If I recall, Nintendo and Sony were originally going to be allies, but a rivalry brewed when Nintendo wanted to stick with game cartridges for the N64, while Sony wanted to utilize compact discs.Man, I hate this leak.
Crash and Spyro are an awful idea.
They have very little to do with Nintendo, and their legacy is small compared to the third parties in the game. Ryu is fighting game man, Cloud is Final Fantasy/JRPG guy, Sonic and Pac-Man are Sonic and Pac-Man, the others have very strong ties to Nintendo.
In some interviews Sakurai stated that he doesn't want to arbitrarily increase the third party numbers. They must be very big, or have strong reasons to be in the game. I can't see Crash and Spyro meeting those requirements.
I hate how there's so much hate for Nintendo franchises getting "overrepped" but so many people still want more third party characters. It's like the game being about Nintendo doesn't matter anymore.
Ahem... Cloud???Man, I hate this leak.
Crash and Spyro are an awful idea.
They have very little to do with Nintendo, and their legacy is small compared to the third parties in the game. Ryu is fighting game man, Cloud is Final Fantasy/JRPG guy, Sonic and Pac-Man are Sonic and Pac-Man, the others have very strong ties to Nintendo.
In some interviews Sakurai stated that he doesn't want to arbitrarily increase the third party numbers. They must be very big, or have strong reasons to be in the game. I can't see Crash and Spyro meeting those requirements.
I hate how there's so much hate for Nintendo franchises getting "overrepped" but so many people still want more third party characters. It's like the game being about Nintendo doesn't matter anymore.
Cloud may not have as strong of a connection to Nintendo, but he's still seen as the definitive RPG protagonist, the sort of character that most people think of when they think of the genre. Crash and Spyro don't really have that, though I could see Crash making it in at some point. (Spyro, I'm not as sure about; I don't know much about his original games, or if they're viewed as highly as Naughty Dog's Crash games)Ahem... Cloud???
What kind of idiot would promise to eat a shoe?Interesting development, to say the least.
True or not (and I'm leaning towards not), can you imagine a world where Cloud, Spryo and Crash all make it into Smash Bros, but not PlayStation All Stars?
Nutty, man.
He's pretty much nonexistant in Japan, and the ports that they did get of the original trilogy were apparently a mess, so yeah, it's hard to imagine.Isn't Spyro unpopular in Japan? As cool as he would be, I'd be pretty surprised if he made it into Smash.
Because most of the Characters left for Nintendo are C/D tiers.I hate how there's so much hate for Nintendo franchises getting "overrepped" but so many people still want more third party characters. It's like the game being about Nintendo doesn't matter anymore.
I definitely don't see Spyro getting in since his games did really poorly in Japan, but Crash at the very least has a strong legacy. Plus Crash has had games on Nintendo systems, including Nintendo exclusive titles, since the GBA/GameCube days. He's not without merit.Man, I hate this leak.
Crash and Spyro are an awful idea.
They have very little to do with Nintendo, and their legacy is small compared to the third parties in the game. Ryu is fighting game man, Cloud is Final Fantasy/JRPG guy, Sonic and Pac-Man are Sonic and Pac-Man, the others have very strong ties to Nintendo.
In some interviews Sakurai stated that he doesn't want to arbitrarily increase the third party numbers. They must be very big, or have strong reasons to be in the game. I can't see Crash and Spyro meeting those requirements.
I hate how there's so much hate for Nintendo franchises getting "overrepped" but so many people still want more third party characters. It's like the game being about Nintendo doesn't matter anymore.
The only Nintendo franchise that is really getting a huge number of criticism regarding "overrepresentation" at this point is Fire Emblem. Though given the how well-known the franchise and its characters are in comparison to Mario and Pokemon, I can't say I'm really surprised.I hate how there's so much hate for Nintendo franchises getting "overrepped" but so many people still want more third party characters. It's like the game being about Nintendo doesn't matter anymore.
That's such bull****. Most of the third parties you guys pick are C/D tiers. Crash and spryo were virtually non-existing before they got a re-release. Go play Mugen if you want a third party extravaganza. Third parties should be guests, not a main stay in smash. This is a Nintendo game and should always include Nintendo characters first, and MAYBE one or two third parties.Because most of the Characters left for Nintendo are C/D tiers.
Third Parties, even the Lowest we can think of are around S to B tiers characters.
Third Parties sells games and console by themselves and generate more hype.
C/D tiers Characters do not.
No need to be a genius to understand that Smash is a Console seller and Nintendo need more Star power in it. And Third Parties is where it is.
Oh yeah because Sonic/Snake/Pac-Man/MegaMan/Cloud/Ryu/Rayman/Phoenix Wright/Layton/Sora/Lara-Croft/Agumon/Dante/any FF character/ Most of Capcom / Sonic characters are C/D tiersThat's such bull****. Most of the third parties you guys pick are C/D tiers. Crash and spryo were virtually non-existing before they got a re-release. Go play Mugen if you want a third party extravaganza. Third parties should be guests, not a main stay in smash. This is a Nintendo game and should always include Nintendo characters first, and MAYBE one or two third parties.