osby
Smash Obsessed
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2018
- Messages
- 24,013
But he was there just so that his fans who miss him from the Melee could get him back in this game. His moves are not especially different from Marth but a certain part of his fans simply didn't cared. He was always "lesser" Marth in gameplay sense. They simply like the character and had an emotional attachment to him.hitboxes and playstyle are what we see. as comeititve players what casual (read most) of the playerbase sees is an imitation of another character.
i've had this conversation several times at parties:
"Hey man you know this game right?"
"which of the sword users is good? The fire guy?"
"not really he's a lesser version of the blue haired one.
or just pick cloud"
ascetics matter. honestly roy mechanics are off putting and do not work well. His time as a relevant fire emblem character is long past. Luigi is not in a similar situation as roy. nor is falco or any other semi-clone. Roy is a semi clone in a crowded space of a niche franchise, who's not truly relevant to that series history among fans, or historical relvance in game canon.
competitive smash has never been the focus. characters with variety in animations, weapons, and obvious play differences are the prority (look at every newcomer in 4). If this was street fighter you can have characters that have the same/similair moveset (shotos) but becuase that game is about hardcore fgc first that is seen as a good thing in smash roy doesn't get the same liberty. How those moves behave has been less important than how it looks. Lucas absorber and pk thunder LOOK and BEHAVE differently from ness. Luigi has a very different moveset to mario he can barely even be called a clone in 4.
I wouldn't call Fire Emblem niche really, it is still one of the oldest major IPs of Nintendo and... well, I know some people are bored to hear this but if you don't play competitively, you didn't had to buy Roy. He was just added for his fans.