A) It's called the International Olympic Committee, so you obviously don't know as much as you are saying
Yes, I mistakenly called it something else.
Obviously I know nothing about sports and the committee then.
Excuse me for not being infalliable.
B) Are you really calling ballroom dancing a sport?
The Inernational Olympic Committee classified DanceSport (i.e. Competitive Ballroom Dancing) as a sport.
The point that I was making earlier is that no one is distinguishing between competition and sport. Everyone is basically saying if it's a competition, then it's a sport, and I think it should be more defined than that.
No, we're saying that if it's a Competitive
organized activity, then it's a sport. By today's terminology.
C) What I think is wholly irrelevant only to you, because I know lots of people IRL who completely agree with me, and frankly I think their opinion is more important than yours because you are very bad at arguing if you get that pissed off after like a day that consists of 3 posts of arguing.
1) Your opinion is important because you know people IRL who agree with you?
2) I'm not pissed. I simply stopped being nice. You seem incapable of differentiating between "not nice" and pissed. This is how I usually am in most debates. It's just that I give everyone a chance to prove themselves not-idiots before unleashing my acerbity.
D) You took my injury thing out of context. I'm saying their must be some sort of minimum athleticism required, thus you don't have massively overweight people consistently being successful (ie John Daily).
1) You explicitly stated that you think the capacity for injuries is required.
2) Massively overweight people can do well at a whole bunch of sports. Any racing sport, for example. Competitive fishing. Bowling. Pretty much any sport that does not require fitness or simple arm strength.
E) Seriously, read EVERYTHING i'm saying instead of jumping to conclusions. Like I've said over and over, THIS IS MY OPINION.
And like I said time and time again: Your opinion is
stupid. That's right, I think that some people can have stupid opinions.
Also, I specifically referred to your opinions as your opinions several times. However, you are currently participating in a debate about what should and shouldn't be classified as a sport. Thusly, one must assume that your opinion is that your opinion of what is and isn't a sport
should be the opinion that counts, i.e. the one which officially decides what is and isn't a sport.
Some people here may agree, some may not. You OBVIOUSLY don't, but isn't the point of this thread to debate? Learn how to.
I am. You aren't. You are
stating your opinion. I am
refuting your arguments. So far, you've been unable to refute a single one of my arguments. In fact, you haven't even
tried refuting the vast majority of my arguments except stating "Well,
my opinion is that...".
No, your opinion means bupkis. Try refuting my arguments, such as why activities such as chess, ballroom dancing (yes, it
is a sport) and racing (cars, boats) are officially recognized as sports. Stating "It is my opinion that that shouldn't be the case!" over and over again isn't debating.
Seriously, have you provided
any arguments except "In my opnion..."? I mean,
why should sports require a form of athleticism/opportunity for injury, ability to directly affect your opponent, etc.? You never actually argue
why your opinion matters, simply that it's your opinion (and it matters because... you know people IRL who agree with you).
I suggest you look up the definition of the word "debate". It is
not "Stating your opinion".