I wish these synopses actually said anything about the character. This one sounds like it was written by a third grader.
Peach
"Lame, then scary, then mediocre."
What does this even mean? It's not addressed anywhere in the overview.
"Peach is a decent character that will be forever one-upped by the higher tiers."
A harsh statement, care to back it up?
"Most of her good stuff is only good if your opponent doesn't SDI properly or is just plain not used to what you do. ".....................lol.........................................my opponent?
Can we get a single example? Since she's rendered useless by SDI, it seems as though there would be at least ONE glaring instance. Enlighten us.
"This said, the number of Peach players is low; it is likely this will generally be in your favor as a Peach player."
...................................................................................................................Why would it be in my favor? I don't play Peach.
"Peach plays vastly different than most other characters in the game..."
How? How does she play? How is it different than most characters? How does this help or hurt her?
"...but appears to be similar;"
Similar to what? Cottage cheese? Metaknight? What?
"She often is as confusing as playing the Ice Climbers, though your opponent won't think of it that way."
............................................................................................my opponent?
WHY?
Assuming that this is talking about playing against Peach (which could be made more clear), why is she as confusing to fight as the Ice Climbers? And why won't "my opponent" think of it that way? EXPLAIN.
"Peach is an excellent pocket character for those that have fallen in love with her."
Can't this be said about any character?
"She is a wild card of the utmost degree whose gameplay focuses on using the tried-and-true tactics of good spacing, feints, and shield pressure that can be a frustrating experience for an opponent that just wants to rush in blindly."..................................................................OOOHHHH, I get it! This overview isn't talking about me. So wait, why were all the "you"s in there again?
Here it is! The substance of the overview, finally! Too bad it's only one sentence long and now the synopsis is over. This is the only useful information in the whole report; Everything else could have been left out and it would of had the same exact meaning (unless the previous ideas were expanded upon).
Please, next time, try to include more information and less random... oh what should I call it... CRAP.
this might be totally wrong tho
