And so is banning MK.lol thats a horrible idea
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
And so is banning MK.lol thats a horrible idea
I am playing Devil's advocate Though I can't say I'm for the ban. I play SF4 now =pAren't you pro-ban? :D Devil's advocate? Or have you repented?
lol @ you following this thread for hundreds of pages straight pouncing on anyone who disagrees with you by saying BUT BUT SAGAT!lol @ Supermodel From Paris taking solace in that statement to make himself feel better.
MK shouldnt be banned because this is Brawl.
I wouldn't mind if MK is banned because it would make my transition to Marth a whole lot easier but he obviously shouldn't be banned. (Yes I main MK now)
I have never made a comparison between MK and Old Sagat. Ever.lol @ you following this thread for hundreds of pages straight pouncing on anyone who disagrees with you by saying BUT BUT SAGAT!
Cuz its likeEdit:Emo Turtle, explain to me why the idea (of including only the best Metaknights within a tournament by having them eliminate the weaker of them before hand, or by grouping the Metaknights together to allow the winner of the regulars tournament to face the best Metaknight at that tournament) is a bad idea. Personally, I don't see why such extremes are needed, but explain why it is a "horrible" idea.[/COLOR]
:flame:
What straws? I don't need to grasp at straws to insult you.I have never made a comparison between MK and Old Sagat. Ever.
I also haven't even been on this board for at least a week, and I haven't read back for a week's worth of posts.
lol @ you grasping for straws that don't exist.
Better that she grabs for imaginary straws than bends them, because then we'd have to lock Paris up in Bedlam.I have never made a comparison between MK and Old Sagat. Ever.
I also haven't even been on this board for at least a week, and I haven't read back for a week's worth of posts. I don't read even half of the posts on these pages of mine (which are set to 50).
lol @ you grasping for straws that don't exist.
Also, how do you keep the other people from going Metaknight mid tourney?^
lol at discussing turning into arguing.
Control yourselves, kay? ^_^
Cuz its like
All MKs on one side of the bracket:
"Only pick MK if you're the best MK around!"
And thats just a dumb way of getting less MKs at tournaments haha
The MK pool just seems unfair, honestly. =)
Just because they have the advantage in matchups doesn't mean they should be screwed over in brackets and stuff. xD
That idea would be EPIC...but i don't think it should be official...it really isn't tournament ethnic.:flame:
Edit:Emo Turtle, explain to me why the idea (of including only the best Metaknights within a tournament by having them eliminate the weaker of them before hand, or by grouping the Metaknights together to allow the winner of the regulars tournament to face the best Metaknight at that tournament) is a bad idea. Personally, I don't see why such extremes are needed, but explain why it is a "horrible" idea.
:flame:
aww you no fun...All MKs on one side of the bracket:
"Only pick MK if you're the best MK around!"
And thats just a dumb way of getting less MKs at tournaments haha
The MK pool just seems unfair, honestly. =)
Just because they have the advantage in matchups doesn't mean they should be screwed over in brackets and stuff. xD
:flame:That idea would be EPIC...but i don't think it should be official...it really isn't tournament ethnic.
Good point. Guess we'd just have to take their word for it. An MK appearing in the wrong side of the brackets (or a non-MK appearing in the MK brackets) could be an instant disqualification from the tourney... o_OAlso, how do you keep the other people from going Metaknight mid tourney?
"What straws" is a good question, since we know they don't exist. The straws being me making that comparison, of course... which never happened.What straws? I don't need to grasp at straws to insult you.
And I'm glad you haven't made that horrible comparison. This is one case in which I'm happy to be wrong.
Ahh, good point.Also, how do you keep the other people from going Metaknight mid tourney?
:flame:
But I know that the ideas listed weren't good. I just kinda hate cinical 1-liners with no explination. And so I asked the Turtle with Self Help Issues to explain himself
Uhm... I see more noobs whining about Mach Tornado being oh so broken than I see scrubs argueing why Meta Knight is not the best character.The number of anti-ban is going up because many of them are new to competitive gaming and don't have decent cases to argue. xD
Uhm... No? lol. We just want to see valid proof why Meta Knight is oh so bad for the metagame despite other gaming communities having similar situations yet not collapsing on themselves and how he is horribly destroying all of his opponents and how even the dumbest noob can pick him up and win a tournament just by putting the selection coin onto Meta Knight's picture.Or maybe because for every proban that argues in here, there are always three antiban people spamin it up sayin NOT A VALID POINT NA UH.
:flame:Good point. Guess we'd just have to take their word for it. An MK appearing in the wrong side of the brackets (or a non-MK appearing in the MK brackets) could be an instant disqualification from the tourney... o_O
You're implying that most if not all anti-ban people play Meta Knight. I don't. He's listed as one of my Tertiaries, but a Tertiary is just a **** n' Giggles character people rarely use. I have never mained or secondaried Meta Knight.In reality, there are fewer proban people arguing because they don't really have anything to loose. Imagine how much an antiban metaknight main has to loose. Imagine someone who uses Metaknight for his CP against Marth. These people would be affected greater by the ban than a pro banner would.
Though note, this is not a statement meant that they are biased, just they have more to loose, and are more passionate hence.
I could've sworn you were once pro-ban. Memory lapse or were you pro-ban of something else, such as D3's Infinite?I am playing Devil's advocate Though I can't say I'm for the ban. I play SF4 now =p
http://www.smashboards.com/showpost.php?p=7256341&postcount=3120
Projecting, now are we? People who are new to Competitive gaming and who have very little insight into how it works are more likely to want to ban things.The number of anti-ban is going up because many of them are new to competitive gaming and don't have decent cases to argue. xD
Idiotic solution. Rigging tournaments to promote diversity? Yes, pl0x!This was yelled at in the APEX livestream... Wouldn't be a bad idea for TO's to wiggle around in:
Why hasn't any TO's considered placing ALL of the MK's in one side of the bracket? Or make a small MK pool before the tourney, and tops end up in the tourney? That should shut up pro-ban.
Because you have selective reading. I was not the one who brought them up originally. Pro-banners brought them up, at which point I refuted them.And because that's how it was. The arguments were intelligent, both sides making great points, then I come back the next day, see you, see matchup discussion going on. Then I see mango trolling. And now this thread sucks again.
Say what you want, but at least we use facts and evidence. What has Supermodel from Paris used, really, besides his subjective opinions and hypocrisy?Or maybe because for every proban that argues in here, there are always three antiban people spamin it up sayin NOT A VALID POINT NA UH.
No... Meta Knight is Mexican. What are you saying?Tournament Ethnic? I KNEW THIS WAS A RACIAL ISSUE! STOP HATING ON METAKNIGHT 'CAUSE HE'S BLACK! *** GAS! XD
:flame:No... Meta Knight is Mexican. What are you saying?
*ah-hem*:flame:
Tigga please, he's obviously Black. You ever seen a Mexican move that fast? (Jumping the Border does not count). If someone yells out "FRIED CHICKEN", Metaknight will Glide accross the stage to get to it first.
:flame:
Did I say otherwise?Yuna, this whole topic IS SUBJECTIVE and you are an idiot if you think otherwise please go away.
I main Bowser, secondary Zero Suit Samus, use Samus and Meta Knight for the lulz. So that's four.You're implying that most if not all anti-ban people play Meta Knight. I don't. He's listed as one of my Tertiaries, but a Tertiary is just a **** n' Giggles character people rarely use. I have never mained or secondaried Meta Knight.
Neither does Successor of Raphael, AFAIK. Neither does adumbrodeus, IIRC. Guess what, we've been three of the most vocal and involved anti-banners in this thread.
Someone needs to watch the English dub of the Kirby anime.Tigga please, he's obviously Black. You ever seen a Mexican move that fast? (Jumping the Border does not count).
:flame:*ah-hem*
...
:flame:You're implying that most if not all anti-ban people play Meta Knight. I don't. He's listed as one of my Tertiaries, but a Tertiary is just a **** n' Giggles character people rarely use. I have never mained or secondaried Meta Knight.
Neither does Successor of Raphael, AFAIK. Neither does adumbrodeus, IIRC. Guess what, we've been three of the most vocal and involved anti-banners in this thread.
Thats a question, scrub.How do you do it.
:flame:Wow Da D mon you are so amazingly not funny at all. How do you do it.
I don't know. Maybe he's just better at riding meat than you.Wow Da D mon you are so amazingly not funny at all. How do you do it.
WRONG!!!!! needs more exclamation points...Thats a question, scrub.
lern2questionmark.[!!!!!!!!!]
Na jk. =P
Wait, this thread isn't a joke?The points being brought up are so redundant, this thread is almost a joke.
:flame:M2k lost to lain
He shouldn't be banned kthxbai