Jason told me the anti-ban side was winning big time. Good to know it stayed that way.
Well, then you suck.
MK is perfectly beatable. He has a bad match and several evenish ones, so there are many ways to beat him.
The argument you're using is very scrubbish and whiny indeed.
God, you really ARE an idiot, aren't you? No, I'm not afraid to say that JUST because you have some "colored" name. You are a FREAKING idiot.
Not only do you provide absolutely NO back-up to your statements, but you critisize the people who are TRYING to beat Meta-Knight. Of course, as your ANTI-ban opinion states: "Find ways to beat him". I am saying "We have, and we can't. What now?". You say "Then you suck". That is
not a valid argument. That is an immature, and absolutely childish response to a perfectly logical argument.
Here's a tip, how about you get the **** off your high horse and explain to me the reasons why Meta-Knight is beatable, and explain the circumstances of MK's "bad" and "evenish" matches.
Because you clearly, CLEARLY have SOME idea what these matches are, hmm? We've tackled every single match-up, and I know that you aren't some "all-knowing" character guru. A few pages back, someone posted ALL of the match-ups against MK from ALL of the boards, which clearly stated that Meta-Knight has only 1 match-up that could be considered "evenish" and several match-ups in which either a player got very lucky and used that circumstance to waver a closer match-up with MK, or there isn't enough experience to determine a close match-up.
I've watched you post in many, many threads, and you really can not provide any sort of proof of any of your statements. I think you suffer from an inflated opinion of your own flesh and blood, and to be honest, it isn't doing a thing to help you.
EDIT: I posted this BEFORE your last post above me, and now I will counter it.
We've given SEVERAL reason why the MK v. Snake match is either 50:50 or 55:45 Meta-Knight. Do you just refuse to believe in this?
Do you expect ANYONE to believe that FOURTEEN characters have some COMPETITIVE POTENTIAL against an experience Meta-Knight? I highly, HIGHLY doubt that. 60:40 is still a substantial advantage, and still can not make the match any less exhausting for the person battling MK.