DanteFox
Smash Champion
Don't lie, you would probably just be browsing smashboards anyway.Effin Friday @ 4?!?
Well, I guess I will be there a little late. I'll have to cut my ballin' time a little short for you smash gnomes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb6e0/eb6e064145cbdfb955861a2bc688e1828c9445e1" alt="Laugh :laugh: :laugh:"
Btw junk, the reason I said that is not because SB/SLO aren't good, it's just because there aren't many tournaments around here. Of course I'm not sure how PRs work in the first place so I could just be talking out of confusion.
Edit: Nevermind I just looked at the socal pr criteria and here it is
# Tournament performance - It's not about how high a person placed, but rather who they defeated and who they lost to. Rankings take into consideration a person's collective Singles, Doubles, and Crew performances over history and of recent times.
# Consistency of Results - Self explanatory, but nonetheless I'll explain. If a person has done well or poorly in a singular tournament, it is not enough to warrant a major shift in their respective rank. On the other hand, a person who has continually produced similar results over many tournaments will be assessed accordingly.
# Competitiveness of Tournament participated in - It's great that you can win a local GameStop tournament, but if there's no good there, don't expect it to boost your ranking. Tournaments which have highly ranked or respected participants (from either local or out of state regions) will be given greater weight.
# Must be a current resident in (insert area)
so there's no formula for the pr, just a panel and the community's consensus. So in a sense, Gish is right, there aren't enough players to form a panel, but we could at least form a general idea of the top 5 or 3 or at least 1 player(s) in SB/ SLO.