D
Deleted member
Guest
I say again, RoboPup for Smash Bros.
It's a robot, so PETA won't flip their ****.
It's a robot, so PETA won't flip their ****.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
This reminds me of how I saw people who wanted the robot dog from Tokyo Jungle in PSASBR. LolI say again, RoboPup for Smash Bros.
It's a robot, so PETA won't flip their ****.
Considering that they have already run into issues with the Ice Climbers in the 3DS version, I heavily doubt they will add another character using the same gimmick.-N would be a mix of Ice Climbers and Pokemon Trainer and fight on the battlefield alongside Reshiram, Zekrom, and Zoroark.
Doubt that will happen. Just like what Falkoops said.-N would be a mix of Ice Climbers and Pokemon Trainer and fight on the battlefield alongside Reshiram, Zekrom, and Zoroark.
any other thoughts from peepz? (i feel like a tool for saying peeps.)Is it weird that this is the roster i could see us ending up with?
I'm not saying we will end up with this. But it's just something that seems likely in my opinion. I am probably wrong though.
Magnus over Palutena... While it's possible, I doubt it. Maybe if he appeared in more chapters.any other thoughts from peepz? (i feel like a tool for saying peeps.)
Yeah. It's pretty depressing. But i guess it could be considered understandable.Magnus over Palutena... While it's possible, I doubt it. Maybe if he appeared in more chapters.
Other then that, I can see us getting something close to this roster, as depressing/unfortunate as it is. It's not completely safe as it's got a few interesting characters despite it's cuts. Having both Mewtwo and Lucario (Which is still realistically plausible) and Tom Nook and Villager isn't even remotely close to playing it that safe, and a Link between World's link just sounds nice.
I'm liking where this is going.
also nah you're not a tool but we'll all be tools for buying both versions of this damned game
Well it's surely still an interesting roster, and to non-fans (unlike some of the others I've seen the past few days) it'd probably be more interesting to them. It's not that bad by any means, but I guess time goes by and we'll see all in due time.Yeah. It's pretty depressing. But i guess it could be considered understandable.
I can honestly see Tom Nook being a hidden character. (He'd be a Luigi-ish character)
True.Well it's surely still an interesting roster, and to non-fans (unlike some of the others I've seen the past few days) it'd probably be more interesting to them. It's not that bad by any means, but I guess time goes by and we'll see all in due time.
HAHAHAHA ! And WHERE does this prove the likeliness of Pac-Man? Yeah, I just posted proof from Sakurai himself, and the only way you try to convince yourself you are right is to say "Oh, this guy is clearly stupid. It's like talking to a brick wall because he doesn't say what I want to hear. I'll just set him to ignore." That's more effective than proof and sources. What you posted WOULD have backed up Pac-Man if it hadn't already been shot down by Sakurai.And there you go lying again using the term special "treatment" a word he never used. I'm sorry but, this is TOO good. You're right it's not fun debating with me. It's a BLAST debating with you. This is just hilarious. You replace a QUOTE with words he never used to make it sound like what you WANT to hear. I'm sorry but, name calling and saying I'm arrogant for proving you wrong on something does NOT prove your point. That's just painful. I LOVE it when you lose a debate so you have no choice, but to result to saying that debating with me is hopeless. But, in a way it is. Because you are terrible at it. You even said that ANY third party character is possible......................THAT is funny. I suppose you would fight to the death to try to prove the possibility of Master Cheif. Also I don't claim to be right 100% of the time JUST because I proved you wrong about something and there is nothing you can say to contradict it other than to claim he meant something completely different. Don't get so butthurt over nothing. I AM a waste of your time to debate with. Because you can't come up with anything to prove my point wrong other than to say "Oh, this is what Sakurai MEANT, Sakurai just didn't know what he was talking about." If anything it's a waster of time to talk with you. You have nothing to back up your argument, when you lose you result to name calling and saying I'm arrogant because you were wrong about something, and then you try to take a shot at a character from my roster with no reasons that a character is unlikely. If you won't listen to the CREATOR OF THE GAME, there is NO way ATTEMPTING to debate with you is a good ideas. If you want me to take you seriously please try harder next time. So just set me to ignore because you can't prove me wrong. Honestly I expected more from you.I still don't see where you get: Pac-Man = Zero possibility. Sakurai is stating that including a Namco character in the game won't be based on the fact that they helped develop SSB4 but whether a Namco character deserves to be in Smash Bros. If Sakurai decided to add a Namco character and he feels Pac-Man could add a lot to Smash Bros., then he will add him in. Namco characters inclusion works just as any other third party character inclusion. And I have no ****ing clue if he will be in the game or not...or a namco rep for that matter. No one 100% knows. Personally, I would much rather see a different Namco rep such as Lloyd or Nightmare but that's my own bias. However, I still recognize that Pac-Man does not have a absolute zero chance of being included. The possibility still exists if Sakurai decides he wants to add him in. It is the case of any other 3rd party character, not just Namco. In addition, I can definitely see haters saying "You only added [Namco character] because they helped develop the game." Possibly, Sakurai wanted to indicate to fans that there is a leveled field for choosing characters and he does not play favorites. How you saw "Pac-Man = Zero possibility" from that article is beyond me. I am not saying that Pac-Man is 100% guaranteed or even has a above average possibility - I am just stating that Pac-Man is possible regardless of that article as with any namco character or 3rd party character.
Sakurai is well aware of the character; drawing from the article you posted "My inquiry about Namco Bandai characters did lead Sakurai to ask me a question in return - if I had to pick one character, which Namco Bandai character would I want in Super Smash Bros.? The answer seemed obvious to me - the original arcade version of Pac-Man. Sakurai then asked me what a Final Smash might look like for that, and we started to discuss how how Pac-Man could become super-powered, and chase other characters around a stage, attempting to eat them. It was a surreal discussion to say the least, but shows that Sakurai is always contemplating what else he might add to his projects, packing them full of as much content as possible." I wouldn`t say that confirms or de-confirms Pac-Man. It does confirm Sakurai is aware and, at some level, acknowledged Pac-Man to some degree.
As for my quote, how did I lie? Please elaborate.
You are not the first to say "Namco won't have special treatment*. You first came here in May 2013 but people here have been speculating since before Smash Bros. 4 was announced and discussion between Namco`s involvement/character inclusion heavily discussed after Namco's involvement announcement. And the "Namco not getting special treatment" was around waaay before you decided to sign up. It's not an original idea from you, that's for sure.
Like how you admitted that Ninten and Lyndis is unlikely? And no, you aren't shoving it in people's faces. You are just being a pretentious douche that believes himself to be 100% correct every time; all the time when in fact you are not. You are a waste of my time to argue/debate with.
Pac-Man is still the best representation for Namco if Namco is ever going to get a character in Smash.HAHAHAHA ! And WHERE does this prove the likeliness of Pac-Man? Yeah, I just posted proof from Sakurai himself, and the only way you try to convince yourself you are right is to say "Oh, this guy is clearly stupid. It's like talking to a brick wall because he doesn't say what I want to hear. I'll just set him to ignore." That's more effective than proof and sources. What you posted WOULD have backed up Pac-Man if it hadn't already been shot down by Sakurai.And there you go lying again using the term special "treatment" a word he never used. I'm sorry but, this is TOO good. You're right it's not fun debating with me. It's a BLAST debating with you. This is just hilarious. You replace a QUOTE with words he never used to make it sound like what you WANT to hear. I'm sorry but, name calling and saying I'm arrogant for proving you wrong on something does NOT prove your point. That's just painful. I LOVE it when you lose a debate so you have no choice, but to result to saying that debating with me is hopeless. But, in a way it is. Because you are terrible at it. You even said that ANY third party character is possible......................THAT is funny. I suppose you would fight to the death to try to prove the possibility of Master Cheif. Also I don't claim to be right 100% of the time JUST because I proved you wrong about something and there is nothing you can say to contradict it other than to claim he meant something completely different. Don't get so butthurt over nothing. I AM a waste of your time to debate with. Because you can't come up with anything to prove my point wrong other than to say "Oh, this is what Sakurai MEANT, Sakurai just didn't know what he was talking about." If anything it's a waster of time to talk with you. You have nothing to back up your argument, when you lose you result to name calling and saying I'm arrogant because you were wrong about something, and then you try to take a shot at a character from my roster with no reasons that a character is unlikely. If you won't listen to the CREATOR OF THE GAME, there is NO way ATTEMPTING to debate with you is a good ideas. If you want me to take you seriously please try harder next time. So just set me to ignore because you can't prove me wrong. Honestly I expected more from you.
You sound angry.Noah. You're a ****ing idiot. You are a dumb piece of **** and you need to get off your non existent high horse.
You are an arrogant piece of **** and you need to learn how much of a ****ing idiot you really are.
Die.
lolYou sound angry.
Yeah, it's a shame. I forgot about that.Considering that they have already run into issues with the Ice Climbers in the 3DS version, I heavily doubt they will add another character using the same gimmick.
N could work by standing in the background like Red, but it just doesn't seem to fit his character.Doubt that will happen. Just like what Falkoops said.
He'd be better as another Pokemon Trainer.
EDIT: Crap. I accidentally double posted what i was going to edit into my post.
The problem is that it isn't likely to happen because of the problems the 3DS version has. (Which you already mentioned how you accidentally forgot about it) Chances are in favor of being another Pokemon Trainer sadly. (Even though i wouldn't mind playing as the actual trainer)Yeah, it's a shame. I forgot about that.
N could work by standing in the background like Red, but it just doesn't seem to fit his character.
I see N as the type who would fight alongside his Pokemon friends instead of ordering them around from a safe spot.
I know that's what he did in the penultimate battle of Pokemon Black and White, but that was a proper Pokemon battle, instead of a free-for-all.
This is what I mean. When you have nothing to back up why you think my roster is even close to being as unrealistic as yours or when I prove that your characters don't work (even with confirmation from Sakurai.) You're only closing defense is "You're trolling". Sorry if the truth bothers you that much. Also Disagreeing and proving you wrong is NOT trolling. So far ZERO of you have responded to my post with actual facts. Here's a lit of thing you should noNoah, King of the Smash trolls. Sitting in his ivory tower with nothing but his unrealistic rosters as company.
This coming from Noah is terribly ironic.1. Disagreeing and proof does not equal trolling.
This is what I mean. When you have nothing to back up why you think my roster is even close to being as unrealistic as yours or when I prove that your characters don't work (even with confirmation from Sakurai.) You're only closing defense is "You're trolling". Sorry if the truth bothers you that much. Also Disagreeing and proving you wrong is NOT trolling. So far ZERO of you have responded to my post with actual facts. Here's a lit of thing you should no
1. Disagreeing and proof does not equal trolling.
2. The characters most likely is not the same as what the majority of characters this forum WANTS. I think if we have WII FIT TRAINER that Starfy, Ninten, or Ray aren't so impossible as you tried to convince yourself they were. As if they ever were impossible. It's just not what you had and wanted. Not everybody's roster is gonna be the same as you guys'. Come to think of it, for almost every character you point out on my roster you have one on your roster with more of the same reason you say that person won't happen. Here we go with the Hypocrisy again.
Please use facts to back up why a character is likely or unlikely.
so unless you have reasons why what I proved isn't true without using words that Sakurai didn't use, please move to a different subject. Or are you just gonna keep saying I'm trolling and use childish name calling because you can't.
Anybody?
This is what I mean. When you have nothing to back up why you think my roster is even close to being as unrealistic as yours or when I prove that your characters don't work (even with confirmation from Sakurai.) You're only closing defense is "You're trolling". Sorry if the truth bothers you that much. Also Disagreeing and proving you wrong is NOT trolling. So far ZERO of you have responded to my post with actual facts. Here's a lit of thing you should no
1. Disagreeing and proof does not equal trolling.
2. The characters most likely is not the same as what the majority of characters this forum WANTS. I think if we have WII FIT TRAINER that Starfy, Ninten, or Ray aren't so impossible as you tried to convince yourself they were. As if they ever were impossible. It's just not what you had and wanted. Not everybody's roster is gonna be the same as you guys'. Come to think of it, for almost every character you point out on my roster you have one on your roster with more of the same reason you say that person won't happen. Here we go with the Hypocrisy again.
Please use facts to back up why a character is likely or unlikely.
so unless you have reasons why what I proved isn't true without using words that Sakurai didn't use, please move to a different subject. Or are you just gonna keep saying I'm trolling and use childish name calling because you can't.
Anybody?
I like to actually see what people are talking about.You STILL haven't set Noah to Ignore, Swamp?
While I think most of your post ok, you really souldn't say that part when on the same page has said this:I've not called you any names, I've not told you to get lost, nor have I raised any major issues with your roster here.
Noah, King of the Smash trolls. Sitting in his ivory tower with nothing but his unrealistic rosters as company.
While I think most of your post ok, you really souldn't say this part when on the same page is saying this:
What did you expect from one of those pony abominations?Noah is at it again? He brings nothing to the discussion except for hostility, assumptions, arrogance, and his inability to reason. He makes outlandish statements that generally causes the backlash he desires. IMO, he likes it to cause trouble and enjoys people getting angry with him. He loves the attention.
You seem to be glad you took my advice and ignored him.Noah is at it again? He brings nothing to the discussion except for hostility, assumptions, arrogance, and his inability to reason. He makes outlandish statements that generally causes the backlash he desires. IMO, he likes it to cause trouble and enjoys people getting angry with him. He loves the attention.
haha yo i was checking out your signature and its pretty awesome since i have similar tastes on who i want. aside from prince sable, toon zelda+ tetra, mach rider, ashley, dixie, sheriff, tom nook, andy and kos-mos, everyone on there is who i want + shulk and ghirahim. good choices thoughNoah is at it again? He brings nothing to the discussion except for hostility, assumptions, arrogance, and his inability to reason. He makes outlandish statements that generally causes the backlash he desires. IMO, he likes it to cause trouble and enjoys people getting angry with him. He loves the attention.
I think you cut out a little too many characters. Thirty Nine is a little low. Even with those possible cuts.Personally I'm someone who would love it if no characters were cut and if all melee cuts were brought back as well as having a variety of newcomers, including new clonified characters. Of course original movesets are preferred, but if more clones were to mean more characters, I'm fine with that. Still, I don't see the need to feel a large amount of cuts and low number for the total roster would be a total disappointment. For example, I made this rather quickly:
*Sonic should be Mega Man in this picture*; my mistake~
I feel even with some disappointing cuts, that's a roster I would find exciting and enjoyable.
Too many characters......My Newly updated realistic roster
I feel if a character like wii fit trainer got in we will get a significant amount imo.I think you cut out a little too many characters. Thirty Nine is a little low. Even with those possible cuts.
Too many characters......