Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Alot of C-list series do seem to be stuck in this rut where their future is unsure, and in some cases, the outlook appears to be bleak.
Takamaru yes, Little Mac not so much. Punch-Out!! on the Wii was the real push for Little Mac.
I still want to see a playable Animal Crossing character (besides the Villager). I feel Pikmin and Animal Crossing are both fairly important series, but I certainly don't think these are the only ones that are important.
Well, have you played Bayonetta? Game is incredible! It's a fresh mix of the DMC3 gameplay with nutty antics. Also, a lot of her support is due to people actually wanting Dante in Smash, but knowing he can't be in, so instead settle for the one that can get in, that fights in a similar manner.
Well, I largely don't "respect" /v/ so much as it's lately been flooded with new***s and casuals (again). /a/ on the other hand... mostly their taste in anime is what I respect. As for other boards such as /ic/, /fit/, /adv/, and the like. All have been very useful and helpful boards that have helped me in many ways, so I do hold some respect for them.
Bayonetta would be more out of place in Smash Bros. than even Snake, and that is saying something. Bayonetta is about over-the-top violence and over-the-top sexuality.
You don't play as N or Zoroark or any pokemon for that matter. You merely tell them what to do. The only character you play as is the trainer and why would you replace an iconic character like Red who has has been in 14 games with a generic character like Unova Trainer.
And we have to remember that Snake has a disjointed hitbox when he got in Brawl.
Well personally I don't support Bayonetta so much anyway. However I wouldn't be against her getting in. She would definitely be in an interesting pick.
Because we're likely to get a new Pokemon rep somehow. You think of a better solution that is not increasing the Roster. Who do you replace? It's gotta be either Red or Lucario. Take a pic.
Yeah. MGS also sometimes had a bit of a comical/non-serious side to it as well.
I think Snake's guns were taken out not due to violence, but to them being difficult to properly balance. Especially since Snake's primary gun is a Tranquilizer, and he prefers non-lethal takedowns in his games. In fact, the MGS series encourages non-lethal runs and rewards the player for doing so.
They could have changed it during Melee days. It's worth noting that OoT came out a mere three monthes before 64, which is why we didn't see any real OoT content vs. generic Zelda content. His moveset could have been changed to accomadate stuff like the Megaton Hammer, Bombchus, and the magic spells. Instead, the first two were passed up and Link's magic was instead given to Zelda (despite the fact that Link has been seen slinging a lot more spells, primarily in LttP). To reiterate, it could have happened but didn't. And, if Charizard deserved to get in Brawl, about a decade after he made his debut into gaming, I believe he can return.
No. If we got 8 Mario characters (discounting spin-offs), that would be over-reprsenting because that would include pretty much every supporting character in it. If we got 8 pokemon, this wouldn't be over-representing because that's still less then 5% of the cast. You need to take it on a character by character basis instead of franchise as a whole. Just for an example, should Tingle get in because Zelda needs another rep? And, really, I haven't seen anyone on this board saying pokemon is over-represented. Generally, its StarFox that gets called out on that, and occasionally Mother (though, I'm guessing most haven't played Earthbound). Really, Pokemon deserves about 6 slots. Nintendo has very few older series that are still around from the old days. F-Zero has fallen, Mother has fallen, Star Fox has fallen. Yoshi and the DK series only recieve new games every once in a while, but none of these has enjoyed the large success of Pokemon. Better Pokemon get another roster spot then some supporting character from a dead/dying franchise or a random third party.
Yeah, but not as the hero. He was a villian in BW. Though, it's too early to tell whether he'll be remembered as Vader or Yoda. Either way, he's a fleshed out pokemon character which, in and of itself, is a rarity.
Sakurai EXPLICITLY mentioned that he could not include guns and knives for Snake's moveset due to increased sensitivity to realistic weapons in other parts of the world.
Oh, of course Travis has a very low chance of making it, but that's the appeal. He's an underdog.
I suppose. Personally all I want is for Pokemon to get some freshness, while still keeping their slot count to 4-5. I don't want them to take up more than 10% of the roster. Any more than that is truly ridiculous.
The only Fire Emblem game where there is incest is FE4.
Even though your right, several games based on Shonen manga, like One Piece, have guns though they get a A rating in almost every game. Probably due to looking too cartoony.
That's what it was, I don't follow To Love Ru, but I know enough about it to know it's not Shounen Jump.
Yes, because this game is definitely NOT Japanese, and her guns are NOT realistic.
It's definitely implied, I played SS. Never explicitly stated, but definitely implied several times throughout the game. And even if it's just one or two games my point still stands.
You are acting really obnoxious and your points are all full of bigger holes than swiss cheese.
They are about as equally mature. Their casts have the same variety in characters, Ranging from serious sword wielders, to cute girls, to cute animal (girls), to burly buff dudes.
And that then means that Nintendo should (or would) be able to Bayo because her guns aren't that bad since in other fighting games they aren't? Unlikely to me, it's not in Nintendo's nature.
Sakamoto really did a lot to ruin the Metroid franchise. He was the one that came up with Zero Suit Samus, and he was the guy behind Other M. He was the director of all the 2D Metroids except for Metroid II, but I think the rest of the development team kept Sakamoto's bad ideas in check up until Other M. Zero Mission and Fusion was setting the stage for Other M though (Fusion's yappy Samus, and Zero Mission's Zero Suit Samus).
Agreed. Which reminds me, I'm surprised that no one's on the Ryu Hayabusa bandwagon just yet. Oh well.
I don't see how Bayo's guns are "realistic" in any way. Also, you have Sony All Stars to look at, which has already featured REAL guns.
Well, there's one thing we can agree on...
Dear God, don't even start.Agreed. Which reminds me, I'm surprised that no one's on the Ryu Hayabusa bandwagon just yet. Ah well.
You lack any sense of introspection, don't you? I have debunked you all day long, but you just continue to let your cognitive dissonance lead you by your nose.
I don't think it's as much them wanting to or not (I doubt they would turn down the offer), just none of their characters are popular or priority enough for Sakurai to attempt to and go to the effort of including.
They were okay with all those deals with Nintendo and putting Samus/Ridley in DoA 3DS.
