Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
It's best to say I didn't describe Eltale Monsters well enough then. The gameplay is massively changed up with a lot of major additions. Max Brian literally has a ton of projectiles added from any spell with 2 or more projectiles, enough that it lock up the game if an enemy acts before the spell ends. Meaning that using your best stuff is not a good idea all the time. This is a core difference in how you play it. ...Of course, if you're maxed out, you already won, but still. Critical Hits matter a lot as they change the flow of battle where you or the Monster can win far more quickly than normal. The double attack allows you to hit twice with your massively overpowered staff, so you can take down bosses in half the time if not faster with critical hits in mind. None of these are aesthetic differences or irrelevant like being able to... read signs. It's cute to know your stat goes up by showing a colored aura, but not that big of a deal.Moptimus mentioned there being ten games but what he listed really just sounds like three games with multilangual versions with minor differences to me. Can't imagine this being chosen anyhow, seems like Spirit material at best.
OK so I could be wrong here, but wasn't Terry stupid popular in Brazil or something.can i ask the people who still use the relevancy argument why they still do it, is it cause you forgot sakurai put it to bed or cause you think it only applied to terry?
Well, we have April 2019 for a FF game, and March 2018. The series clearly was still relevant during the pass, especially when selecting him.can i ask the people who still use the relevancy argument why they still do it, is it cause you forgot sakurai put it to bed or cause you think it only applied to terry?
Terry: Face of SNK which has constantly made popular games for years. Majorly changed the arcade scene, very popular in Latin America, and Terry himself even appears in every KoF game.can i ask the people who still use the relevancy argument why they still do it, is it cause you forgot sakurai put it to bed or cause you think it only applied to terry?
I think the common misconception is that relevancy, popularity and whatnot are requirements. Boxes to check and if they're not, it's game over. B&K for instance however put that to rest, as they were anything but relevant. Or Duck Hunt. "But B&K were a popular pick" some will argue. Yeah, but again that's bonus points, not necessary nor sufficient. If it were, popular characters like Goku would've already been in Smash.can i ask the people who still use the relevancy argument why they still do it, is it cause you forgot sakurai put it to bed or cause you think it only applied to terry?
cloud had been on a nintendo system before smashOK so I could be wrong here, but wasn't Terry stupid popular in Brazil or something.
As for the relevance argument, I think it does hold some ground. It's by no means the deciding factor as Terry, KKR, and Banjo prove. Basically the way this works in my mind is that if the character is more relevant, there's a better chance of getting fan support which can lead to getting in Smash. Relevance isn't required for fan support (again, KKR/Banjo/Terry if that Brazil thing is true), but it helps. Similar to how never being on Nintendo isn't an automatic deconfirm anymore with Joker and Cloud getting in. It's not required the character shows up on Nintendo systems, but it doesn't hurt their chances if they are.
ok but that doesnt quite answer the questionWell, we have April 2019 for a FF game, and March 2018. The series clearly was still relevant during the pass, especially when selecting him.
So the timing does match up reasonably well with the pass. The franchise was still active.
Another thing to remember is that it's not necessarily on Sakurai or Nintendo's end either. Microsoft agreeing to use B&K doesn't come out of nowhere. They already were in good graces with Nintendo thanks to Minecraft, but they were actively using Banjo-Kazooie as a series via Rare Replay. This becomes increasingly obvious when Sakurai outright advertises people to play the available games on the Xbox. If it wasn't a series being used, Microsoft may not have said yes. Phil Spencer also pretty clearly said he liked the idea, but this is also while the games were part of the Xbox lineup of product. If it wasn't active, it'd be a lot bigger mixup.
The problem with relevancy is people seem to mistake it purely under "new games". That's not how it works. It's how active the product is, and an active product has a better chance of the company saying yes, since Smash is free advertising for their products, making people more interested in the series.
Every 3rd party in Smash had some active product while added, even if it's not new product like Banjo-Kazooie's(the only case actually) case. MegaMan had a crossover comic. It's why I prefer to call B-K "on life support" since it's active without getting new stuff. Last new stuff was some merchandise... just in time for Smash, which is probably the reason for it anyway(and amiibo obviously would be new product eventually).
no i asked why they are still using the argument not why were those two includedTerry: Face of SNK which has constantly made popular games for years. Majorly changed the arcade scene, very popular in Latin America, and Terry himself even appears in every KoF game.
Banjo: Main character of one of the most beloved platformers of all time. Also an insanely popular Smash request that Sakurai himself has acknowledged in the past.
Seems like people tend to forget that characters like Terry and Banjo had a lot going for them despite not having a main game entry in a while. And then they'll use Banjo/Terry's inclusion to justify every character from a dead franchise for some reason.
several characters have gotten in due to sheer popularity, sonic, mega man, ridly, k.rool, b&kI think the common misconception is that relevancy, popularity and whatnot are requirements. Boxes to check and if they're not, it's game over. B&K for instance however put that to rest, as they were anything but relevant. Or Duck Hunt. "But B&K were a popular pick" some will argue. Yeah, but again that's bonus points, not necessary nor sufficient. If it were, popular characters like Goku would've already been in Smash.
Counter-examples are easy to find, so the only valid theory is: relevancy, popularity, etc give bonus points. That's pretty much it. It helps but it's not required. Well, nowadays (and esp for DLC) maybe at least one of them must be true but other than that, point still stands.
"CHISWICK! FRESH HORSES!!!!"BRIAN BLESSED
I'll take a stab at this:can i ask the people who still use the relevancy argument why they still do it, is it cause you forgot sakurai put it to bed or cause you think it only applied to terry?
The character and everything in the game is owned by Imagineer, the original creators and IP holder.Abstain. I only learned about Quest 64 from ProJared (please note that I don't watch him anymore due to the conttoversy). Also, does anybody know who even owns this guy?
Nominations: [Rerate] Rex x5
iver never had so many wall of text repliesI'll take a stab at this:
1) I think, from a corporate perspective, Nintendo has two real goals with Smash DLC: (i) make/sell characters people want to buy and (ii) pick characters that will result in increased sales for their games of origin. Therefore, Nintendo picks characters who are "relevant" in broad terms: either relevant because of fan demand keeping memories of beloved out-of-the-spotlight character alive (ex/ King K Rool), relevant because of upcoming games/recent-released games/notable ports/etc (ex/ Joker, Hero, Banjo, Terry, and Byleth all apply here), or relevant because of both (ex/ Banjo especially applies here, though most characters in Smash had demand prior to their reveals because the fandom is big). I don't think that supersedes Sakurai's comment about characters being fun to play as the priority, but, like, they aren't going to add every single character who is fun to play. There has to be other factors deciding who is chosen. I do think people are sometimes too strict about what one needs to be relevant (ex/ I do think some people were unnecessarily harsh on Terra), but on a day like today... Does Brian have any games currently available to purchase digitally legally? As if your games aren't accessible in some form and you don't have considerable fan demand to keep you in the public memory, then we have major problems.
2) This is a Rate Their Chances thread and there are 5 characters left. A lot of the arguments amount to "fan rules" and/or arguing from precedent, but they also aren't meant to be definitive - it's a competition of predictions when Smash slots are kind of famous for unpredictability. If we really evaluated every character based on how fun they would be, like what Sakurai said was important in Terry's reveal, then we would be rating most characters very highly. I mean, most characters who get nominated are nominated because someone thinks they would be fun... Alternatively, the chance and want scores would become effectively merged, as "they would be fun to play as" is a pretty subjective statement...
Now, Smash Bros is still also a celebration of gaming. There is more to it then just "[character] has new game on Switch, therefore likely." However, if it's a game that isn't in the public memory in some way and isn't legally accessible to modern audiences.... I don't think it's unreasonable to say there is a problem of "relevancy."
Up to 5 at a time, but you need to put at least two sentences in both Chance AND Want in order for your noms to count.how many noms does it take to get rated?
I think you misunderstood their question.Up to 5 at a time, but you need to put at least two sentences in both Chance AND Want in order for your noms to count.
I doesn't take a set amount of nominations. It's merely a matter of which character or concept has the highest amount of nomination once the schedule for the next days is set.how many noms does it take to get rated?
Up to 5 at a time, but you need to put at least two sentences in both Chance AND Want in order for your noms to count.
one way or the other i dont think im getting nate to the top before the thread closesI think you misunderstood their question.
I doesn't take a set amount of nominations. It's merely a matter of which character or concept has the highest amount of nomination once the schedule for the next days is set.
Don't worry. It doesn't take a lot of time for a nomination to get to the top and get locked. Just be patient and nominate everyday. Also, this thread will not close for a loooong time.one way or the other i dont think im getting nate to the top before the thread closes
well alright thenIf you are saying you will not be able to nominate a character or concept to the top, don't worry. It doesn't take a lot of time for a nomination to get to the top and get locked. Just be patient and nominate everyday. Also, this thread will not close for a loooong time.
Not just Brazil, but Latin America as a whole (which includes Chile, Argetina, Bolivia and Mexico, although the last one is in North America)OK so I could be wrong here, but wasn't Terry stupid popular in Brazil or something.