CaLibUr_1337
Smash Lord
Are you trying to tell us something toki?
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Actually **** lucario and samus, they're too floaty for me. Tried em out yesterday. Boring characters with respect to their games. Hurling bananas and shooting lasers are alot more fun.I'm pretty keen on playing again. I'll be there at SmashPlay V.
Matt or Jaice wanna team with me?
EDIT: I agree about variety. I'm picking up Lucario in brawl and Samus in melee. See how that pans out haha.
Falco is harder to use and not as cheap as MK and Snake. His timing for a lot of his tricks are very tight. He also dies a lot easier than all of the other high tiers because of his lack of momentum cancelling and light weight (80% with an olimar Purple Usmash, and about the same maybe a bit more for a snake Utilt), and has a few very bad MU's unlike his high tier counterparts.Also, there's a pretty good reason why some characters are not used. What's more intriguing to me is that apparently Falco is high up the tier list for Brawl but no-one uses him. Tis a mystery.
From what I heard from Attila, other states already have this rule. You either play MK otherwise you can't swap to him later in the set.The main reason why many characters are not used is because MK exists. When is he being banned? At least we could make a rule like 'Cannot use MK for the second or third fight in a set'. I think that would be reasonable for (pocket) MK users. QLD ruleset DOES NOT have to be exactly the same as all of the others states.
lolIt is puzzling how Falco is overseen in QLD...
so much here is wrong.Falco is harder to use and not as cheap as MK and Snake. His timing for a lot of his tricks are very tight. He also dies a lot easier than all of the other high tiers because of his lack of momentum cancelling and light weight (80% with an olimar Purple Usmash, and about the same maybe a bit more for a snake Utilt), and has a few very bad MU's unlike his high tier counterparts.
However he is that high up because his MU on MK is considered = if MK doesn't play gay and plank. It's the same reason why Fox is high tier in Japan too (apart from their style of play being much more agressive).
If MK were ever to be banned (hallelujah) then Fox would drop horribly and Falco would drop a little.
i most definitely never said that, and we have no such rule; i personally am all for a complete mk ban, however.From what I heard from Attila, other states already have this rule. You either play MK otherwise you can't swap to him later in the set.
double mk in teams is banned in vic, not switching to him mid-set.Who considers him oftenly the most difficult? I personally don't find him hard to use at all. Very simple dacus. Monstorous power and his inability to die, along with having the most moves with arguably the biggest disjoint. His grenades take 3 seconds, but he can have 2 out at once and they do damage if they hit you and don't explode (doing more by just hitting you then what the laser does), aswell as not going stale when they do go off.
I heard you say something after our match against S.D and Smoking puppy where we got countered by both of them changing to MK, to which I heard you say 'we have rules against that where I come from'. Must have taken it out of context, my apologies.
I will still argue however that Fox and Falco are largely where they are on the tier because of MK and are 2 of only a few characters that benefit from having MK still not banned. Snake being another one.
I'm glad to hear you think MK should go too though, any ideas why this hasn't happened yet?
Ill have my Xbox there with two sticksAnyone bringing their PS3 for MvC3? :o
See I thought I heard something like that, good rule.double mk in teams is banned in vic, not switching to him mid-set.
Every character has moves that beat others, especially when you compare high tiers. Hell I could go through and name all the moves Luigi has that beats other characters, but it would remain as pointless as telling people which moves winout like you just have. In general Snake's tilts are broken compared to the options of other characters. There is a reason he is the second best character, and this is one of the reasons for it.also, if you think snake is easy to use, you've only played him against noobs (lol qld). his disjoint is nothing special in reality, as mk dtilt/ftilt and diddy fair outranges snake ftilt, and marth dtilt and mk ftilt outranges utilt (im assuming you didn't know that). not to mention characters like mk have priority over his tilts.
Again more information that is common knowledge.his heaviness also makes him a huge target to being juggled, he'll live forever, but against most characters, will not actually be able to recover until he dies. if you're playing properly, at least.
I remember you using this quite a bit (atleast 3 times in one match that I watched), so is it really not useful?dacus is simple, but not overly useful. not even sure why you decided to mention it at all.
I'm not exactly sure what point you are trying to make by this but why use another character, when snake has no MU that is considered unwinnable?there are reasons why no top player has ever successfully picked up snake, but managed to do well with other characters (gluttony's falco or 9B's ics for example).
This has to be one of the most annoying and most redundent things anyone can say in an argument. Not only does it make you sound like a whinging little *****, but it's the same as having some old guy say 'listen to your elders because they know better'. So stupid and 'I don't know why you even brought it up'also, you don't main snake, so your opinion is automatically discredited.
There was a poll in the states that showed that oranges were a bigger threat for cancer, then apples (they had the option to choose both or niether). People are stupid, and polls are even more stupid. Just btw.and there was a poll a while ago, which deduced that ics and snake were the hardest characters to master. just btw.
i'd assume that luigi hasn't a single move to beat snake's utilt, but at the same time, luigi is a bad character. mk/marth/d3/diddy/wario/olimar/falco have plenty of options on the other hand, and punish way harder than any ftilt will. saying 'snake's tilts are broken' is such a '09 mindset; no one believes that anymore, espc when mk clearly has better tilts. tilts aren't even almost as useful as nades and grabs, unless you're versing noobs who a) are unaware of punish options or b) forget to press the shield button.Every character has moves that beat others, especially when you compare high tiers. Hell I could go through and name all the moves Luigi has that beats other characters, but it would remain as pointless as telling people which moves winout like you just have. In general Snake's tilts are broken compared to the options of other characters. There is a reason he is the second best character, and this is one of the reasons for it.
I remember you using this quite a bit (atleast 3 times in one match that I watched), so is it really not useful?
I'm not exactly sure what point you are trying to make by this but why use another character, when snake has no MU that is considered unwinnable?
This has to be one of the most annoying and most redundent things anyone can say in an argument. Not only does it make you sound like a whinging little *****, but it's the same as having some old guy say 'listen to your elders because they know better'. So stupid and 'I don't know why you even brought it up'
There was a poll in the states that showed that oranges were a bigger threat for cancer, then apples (they had the option to choose both or niether). People are stupid, and polls are even more stupid. Just btw.
You can think what you like but there are a number of reasons why snake is number 2. Anyway that's me done for ranting. Will let the thread get back on track yet again from my usual ability to derail it.
Don't flatter yourself too much, our match was played once we both knew we were already through to brackets (niether of us having lost a match). We played the first which was tight on the last stock. The second one I illusioned off the edge twice (including one immediately after coming back from death at 0%). They were simply to see how you played for when I met you in the bracket, and I threw the second because I had learnt what I needed to know. Had I taken either of those matches against you seriously, don't you think I would have used D3?btw, i only flamed cause you said snake was cheap, which i personally found quite offensive. just cause i three stocked you in pools, no need to discredit my skill, please.
"ZXV, what do I do?" Him sitting beside you during that match was no coincidence.i used falco because i didnt want to play the oli/snake mu, cause its ********, not cause i was afraid of the peach/snake mu lol.
ill read the rest later.
We argued points about his tilts and his dacus. We know that his grenades are broken. However, you tried to argue that his grenades were not that great. Again, there is a reason why he is 2nd.given that both jayce and adept focused on snake's tilt game and even his dacus over his nade game shows that they really have no idea what they're talking about. his tilts have nothing on his nades. maybe back before spacing and baiting existed, but not since then have tilts/dacus been complained about. and being number 2 doesn't make him easy to use; you clearly don't even realise his strongest point.
cbf replying to the rest, cause its all answered in my prior post.
Jei is a great player and I look foward to versing him again (I commend him on being regarded as a top player whilst not using a top tier character), but I beat him in both pools and the bracket (remember, when you suggested to him that he use Yoshi instead of Pit) and he commended the way I played. I assure you, AD3PT will not even have to move from his home to verse "someone who knows how to play the game".and i challenge you, pick up snake, and verse someone who knows how to play the game (earl/ted/jei/tibs or anyone considered top ten in aus). mind you, you'd have to travel out of state to find that sort of competition.
funny that you tell me not to flatter myself, when you were the one snidely preparing for our encounter in brackets. that plan didn't work...
Like for most of this 'discussion', this statement very much seems to me that you are saying "alalalalalalalalala, I'm not listening". Stop being so conceited.testies got the right idea :D
and snake vs oli/d3 are generally thought of 65:35ish. you should read discussions and play the game more before commenting.