Should you really be defending a Character just because you CAN include her and she WOULDN'T be a clone?
Funky Kong COULD be made, and not be a clone of Donkey Kong. He's nowhere near the top 10 people that should be in this game.
Screw it: if you like Starfox characters, I think more of the community would be nostlgic if they saw Bill. Or if you want a girl Starfox character: Add Katt Monroe from Starfox 64. She's Falco's love interest (Sort of) and you could take your Artistic License and make her a really fun character.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=apwUMPwnbEk
I never said that I like Krystal or not. heck, this whole talk about a 4th Star Fox is assuming that IF a 4th Star Fox character ever appears! I judge characters by moveset potential and only that.
It doesn't matter for me if the character is a main or not, or if is male or female, or if he/she has a similar appearence to other character or not! Really, I don't care about these details.
I only care about the character's abilities to fight. Heck, that's the whole reason I want the characters on my sig, including Dark Pit! oh, and don't even start about the clone talk! all characters, and that includes Dr. Mario and Pichu, CAN have their own movesets!
Clones only happen when the developers get uncreative and lazy. Whenever I comment about whatever character on this board, I judge by the character's personality, fighting prowess and the source game's gameplay, nothing more. But the priority is, of course, the character's ability to fight.
You should really know how I hate when people say that a certain character would be a clone just because he/she is similar in appearence to another one. Because that is a very short sighted view on things. Melee's roster would be better if the clones weren't clones, that includes Pichu, Dr. Mario and Young Link!
I could hate a certain character, but if I find that such character has fighting capabilities that distinguish from other characters, I am all the way for his/her inclusion in SSB4!