Geno's still an obscure, supporting, third-party character. All three can be argued away individually, but together, they're pretty strong arguments against his inclusion.
Bowser Jr. and Paper Mario are still more likely.
I still say Bomberman should be the third 3rd-party.
Ah, this is prime opening to the old Bomber v. Mega debate. A true battle of the men (Maybe even Pac-Man's involved) Both seem pretty good choices, but which is more likely? Looks like it's time for a status report!
Categories:
Paraphenallia, Nintendocity, Games, and Originality
Paraphenailia: Megaman
Pretty self explanitory. Bomberman may have an array of ice, fire, lightning, and even regular bombs, he just doesn't have the variety of stuff that Megaman has, heck, all of the
Blue Bomber's gear could put Batman's utility belt to shame. Plasma blasts, swords, and about a billion diffrent varieties (From 1 to X!) he's got all of the moves.
Nintendocity: Bomberman
Well, Megaman's been in a bijillion (new number invented just to calculate the amount) GBA games, but Bomberman's actually been in a crossover with Nintendo before (Wario Blast: Featuring Bomberman!) that just begs for a Wario v. Bomberman redeux. That and Hudson hasn't made a Bomberman game that wasn't for Nintendo (I think, unless I missed one)
Games: Megaman
Megaman's games perfected the idea of bosses. (Woodman, anyone?) and the sheer number of fairly decent games squelches Bomberman's sparce few.
Originality: Tie
Some say Megaman would be too much like Samus and bombs were already used dry in the series, but who knows?> With a little sprucing up, both can become excellent players.
Total:
Bomberman: 1.5
Megaman: 2.5
MEAGMAN is the winner. Did I miss any categories? If so, just tell me and there will be a redeux of the Mega v. Bomber debate!
'Nuff said.