Coney
Smash Master
lmfao GIMR never said gaming isn't a job, you imbecile. he was just summarizing what he thought 3 was saying, erroneous or no.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I wouldn't be surprised when it gets canceled if Plank actually got sued.is genesis 2 cancelled? NOOOOO. is Whobo cancelled? NOOOO. now this is a ridiculous point.
so ur saying people who work but still dont have enough money for all the essentials dont have a job? WOOOW the ignorance.A game can't be a job if it doesn't have a good return on the amount you put into it. As of now, the smash community isn't at a high enough level to pay out enough to make it a job.
It's like saying if you try to play in amateur bowling tournaments that pay out $50 every week for first. You're not even guaranteed that money. I'd love to see anyone live on that.
Smash worked fine for me though. Seeing the rate that I won in each game for years has been able to earn me more than enough. Or, at least it should have. But when TOs don't pay out or stupid unlucky stuff happens or people steal then it becomes another story. It's like working at a shop for 6 months then suddenly they decide you won't get paid.
And TO's wouldn't have to 'steal' if things went according to their plan.Whats wrong with gaming as a job when you win? he would be OK if TO's didn't steal
The reason I brought it up is because M2K has said on multiple occasions that smash is his job, and that he needs the money from these tournaments, and cried over how many times he's been screwed over yet he still claims to count on these things as a source of income.look, gaming as a job has nothing to do with what's happening.
It's like 3 is saying: Mew2king gaming isn't a job so you shouldn't be surprised when not getting paid. I see a total disconnect.
I'm going to reply to this and just completely ignore your future posts. Clearly you haven't grown up enough to see what's actually important in life.so ur saying people who work but still dont have enough money for all the essentials dont have a job? WOOOW the ignorance.
I don't think they should cancel because of this. We just must be more careful with tournaments we go to, and hope that the TO's are careful as well.What tournament host would want to make any major tournaments after something like this is blown out of proportion?
No, it's not a joke.
I'm going to reply to this and just completely ignore your future posts. Clearly you haven't grown up enough to see what's actually important in life.
A job is to make money to sustain yourself in life. You can't call a hobby a job if it doesn't pay you enough for it. You can't put "Super Smash Brothers Player" on a resume.
If playing a game is work to you........wow.
shhhhh, they'll point out we actually are and then it'll be 2v1 and thus we lose lolwow djrome are we the same person
we should date
No M2K, what you're doing is as if you were working at a shop for 6 months, and they decide they're not going to pay you, and then you still work at that shop as your sole source of income.Smash worked fine for me though. Seeing the rate that I won in each game for years has been able to earn me more than enough. Or, at least it should have. But when TOs don't pay out or stupid unlucky stuff happens or people steal then it becomes another story. It's like working at a shop for 6 months then suddenly they decide you won't get paid.
I'm am formally inviting everyone agreeing with what plank did, to a tournament I'll host in Georgia. Its 30 bucks a person. I need a new car, so everyone come out.
but getting money from winning tournaments shouldn be unreliable though. The idea that if u place well enough in tournies you get money. this has been the norm since the beginning. if u are going to deviate from this norm then the T.O. must inform everyone of this change.No M2K, what you're doing is as if you were working at a shop for 6 months, and they decide they're not going to pay you, and then you still work at that shop as your sole source of income.
Smash has proven time and time again, to you specifically, that it is unreliable as a means of making a steady income. Yet you still claim to depend on the money form it to support you and your family.
Make better decisions, if you're realistically trying to live off smash then you might want to at least consider getting some concrete evidence that you'll be receiving return on your investment.
yea and thats a damn shame.Bigwenz if someone really believes that not getting paid when you win a tournament is acceptable, then you have already lost the battle.
yah being taken advantage of or ***ked over usually means enough is enoughThis is the exact same as me in 2005-2008. Then mom kept asking for help and I started to run out of something I needed. A combination of selfish people taking advantage, stealing, lying, TOs not paying out, and just plain bad luck at times is why I'm in the situation I am now. Now the money is important and being unable to receive it when you deserve and earn it is not fair. What is important to me is fairness and people getting what they worked for / deserve.
.........but getting money from winning tournaments shouldn be unreliable though. The idea that if u place well enough in tournies you get money. this has been the norm since the beginning. if u are going to deviate from this norm then the T.O. must inform everyone of this change.
Bigwenz if someone really believes that not getting paid when you win a tournament is acceptable, then you have already lost the battle.
The reason it keeps happening is because of enablers like the people in this thread. If you keep siding with people that dont pay the winner for whatever the reason... its going to keep happening. Which is why I keep trying to bring up how we should talk about how to prevent this in the future.. but it seems everyone is to busy enabling plank to care.
http://www.smashboards.com/showthread.php?t=299186yea and thats a damn shame.
and i think that contract thing someone posted: http://img.imgcake.com/smashIOUpngyj.png
should be made standard. that would solve this problem.
yes those things can happen but that doesnt prevent it from being a job. it prevents it from being a GOOD job..........
Yes I know it 'shouldn't' be that way in an ideal world
But we're not in an ideal world because in an ideal world Winterfest wouldn't have been in the situation they were in
And Pound wouldn't have been in the situation they were in
It's poor planning on both parts, that is the point I'm trying to make, and the fact that this isn't the first time something like this has happened, and nothing was put in place to prevent this from happening, should really shed some light on how reliable these things are as a means of making money.
I'm not saying its right, I'm saying IT HAPPENS
If you choose to ignore this fact then you're making a bad judgment call
this is why you don't ****ing play smash to pay the bills
apart from the fact that your peer may also be a bad decision maker, there's always the possibility that you don't take first, or maybe your car breaks down on the way to the venue and you get DQ'd, or maybe your controller breaks and you have to use one you're un familiar/comfortable with
or your flight gets delayed, or the tournament doesn't finish, or this or that or the other
grow up and realize that smash is not a job
LOLOLOLOL Huge laugh cuz I just read the last 5 pages (20 ppp).lol I liked how we just changed subjects:
Current Discussion: Is gaming considered to be a job?
I'm pretty sure that Laijin and 3 are the most realistic people here. Everyone's expecting Plank to pay out. This would be morally right but he's not legally bound to pay anyone but himself.There is absolutely no reason to respond to anything else that 3 or Laijin has to say at this point.
They have proven that they have different beliefs/morals/opinions than the sensible people, it's WHATEVER.
Continuing to address their posts will just bring more headaches.
Did you miss the part where I said its already been answered before in the thread several times? I don't feel like retyping out everything. The thread isn't that long. I'm sure you can find it.
Edit: Basically. We won't really know anything about that until Plank makes another post about it. But as of now the "unaccounted money" isn't looking to be likely true
I think I read something to the effect of this. Is omitting variables still pure math?
-Paypal fees are very small, as you said its like 1.5-2.5%. The fact that I used a safe estimate for the average venue fee more than makes up for this, plus any at the door registration.I already posted exactly how i feel about the situation in the "Pound 5" thread in the tourney discussion, so I won't get into it here. I just wanted to add a couple pieces of information concerning the calculations for missing funds.
While you're figuring only the difference of ((entry fee + venue fee) - (hotel fees incurred) = remaining funds), you're forgetting about his other expenses. Primarily:
--Paypal percentage cuts from all processed funds (approximately 2.5% of all money through paypal, or about $400)
-Door security (OP description mentioned it, paying $10 an hour throughout the event)
-$15 refund per full setup brought by the community (no idea how many setups the community brought, though, or even if he actually refunded people)
-The price of purchasing all the TV's/Cubes which he supposedly stockpiled (The cached thread stated at the time that he had 30 tv's & 15 cubes so far, i'm sure even those weren't cheap.)
-Webhosting costs for his preregistration page, if any.
-He apparently hired an 8-person staff to help run the pools/brackets, at the cost of $50 a person
And the fact that your venue fee calculation is already an overestimate, seeing as how there were not 394 individuals at the tournament but rather that is just a combined number of entry-fee sources.
Total everything up, and the "missing funds" figure really starts to shrink fast, lol.
Bigwenz if someone really believes that not getting paid when you win a tournament is acceptable, then you have already lost the battle.
The reason it keeps happening is because of enablers like the people in this thread. If you keep siding with people that dont pay the winner for whatever the reason... its going to keep happening. Which is why I keep trying to bring up how we should talk about how to prevent this in the future.. but it seems everyone is to busy enabling plank to care.
I didn't say it was acceptable to fund the whole tournament with the pot*sigh* 3....
If people like you just accept that people taking money from the pot is acceptable then they are going to keep taking it.
This has happened enough to where it is no longer just the TDs fault when something like this happens. It is all of ours. "fool me once.." kind of thing.
If asking every td to sign something that agrees to pay the winners the correct percentage of the pot is what it takes. Then that's what we need to do.
As a smasher how can you tell someone they are not entitled to the money they won.
If no one cares about the money, like is said in these posts.
Then WHY are we playing for money at all?
You know its pretty funny.There is absolutely no reason to respond to anything else that 3 or Laijin has to say at this point.
They have proven that they have different beliefs/morals/opinions than the sensible people, it's WHATEVER.
Continuing to address their posts will just bring more headaches.
well, i guess therein lies the difference. i still believe he is 9.5k in debt to the winnersYou know its pretty funny.
Cause I have the exact same opinion about you, DJRome, etc etc.
Edit: Sensible is pretty subjective. In this case, you guys are the ones who lack good morals and sensible opinions to me. Expecting plank to go into 10k+ of debt is absurd.
Believing and being legally bound are two different things.well, i guess therein lies the difference. i still believe he is 9.5k in debt to the winners
And whether or not he wants to pay them at this point is 100% completely up to him. He has zero obligations to at this point. I'm not saying he shouldn't or should, I'm pretty neutral about that. He's the only one that can answer that. Just know theres nothing you can do to force the money out of him.well, i guess therein lies the difference. i still believe he is 9.5k in debt to the winners