Zivilyn Bane
Smash Master
Why wouldn't you?? You've won 50% of the Melee Pathways doubles tournaments you've entered.I probably won't enter teams. Singles maybe.
![Phone :phone: :phone:](/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/phone.png)
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Why wouldn't you?? You've won 50% of the Melee Pathways doubles tournaments you've entered.I probably won't enter teams. Singles maybe.
lol you carried me to first the first time and I got last the second time.Why wouldn't you?? You've won 50% of the Melee Pathways doubles tournaments you've entered.
![]()
Because training against you scrubs isn't even training.You don't even play teams. How do you expect to win lol?
![]()
Man, shoot, man, you just afraid cuz you know you'd get stomped, son, boy.Because training against you scrubs isn't even training.![]()
Pichu's a pretty cool guy though.Ziv speaks the truth. There's no way we can beat him and Roman on teams IF we're both playing Pichu.
Even then, it'd be close![]()
He is cool to troll on guys who you can beat with every character with. But as a whole, he is not a valiant character in battle.Pichu's a pretty cool guy though.
No.I'll ask again. Is Wretched homo?
![]()
Wretched, I think Terry is interested in asking you on a date but first wants to confirm your orientation.I'll ask again. Is Wretched homo?
![]()
I may get a little hugsy, just be warned now.Can I get free hugs if I show up? :3
Oh and is there a little cesars around the church? :| I might pick some pizza's up if I go!
Lmao....I may get a little hugsy, just be warned now.
He might be going to Canada for work?Lmao....
-Dead-
And okay cool cool. I may just do that then for you guys. =] My dad got a package from Canada so he might be going there for work soon which is good news!
Yeah, that is why last month I could not attend Pathways nor Ogre Smash. Some company up there needs him to install a machine and they pay for all his traveling expenses and everything. He will for sure be going, not a maybe.He might be going to Canada for work?
![]()
Give me my ****ing pizza.Lmao....
-Dead-
And okay cool cool. I may just do that then for you guys. =] My dad got a package from Canada so he might be going there for work soon which is good news!
Give me my ****ing pizza. And my ****ing candy corn.Yeah, that is why last month I could not attend Pathways nor Ogre Smash. Some company up there needs him to install a machine and they pay for all his traveling expenses and everything. He will for sure be going, not a maybe.
He will be gone over a week this month, It's just mainly that I don't know exactly which week.
My mom also wanted to do a Halloween Party on the 15th or 22nd.. so my chances once again are very slim The only way is if my Dad goes this week or next week, and/or my mom decides not to do the party. I mean all she would have over is the redneck neighbors lmao.
Only time will tell for that though.
I'll check them out when I get off work. For my system, I was giving a player a .33 addition for a 1-2 loss.Thanks. If it's not too much trouble, could you double check and see if I did this right? I sent the TIO file to your email (medes86@hotmail.com).
The results I got using that calculator:
arby: 1600
Chamberlin: 1333
ACE: 1333
VTS: 1333
Yoshiman: 1067
Seif: 933
Neo: 800
assuming initial rating of 1200
I guess 2-1/1-2 sets can't be quantified?
I would leave it at 50. Although I also favor a different formula for first tournaments when all participants are unrated. I like this better:I did new rating, though I also set the number of prior games to 0. Looks like it produces the same results as performance rating in that case. Should I leave # of prior games at 50 or whatever?
How does using a universal system make them less applicable to use as a benchmark for improvement?You can definitely use the data, but keeping it separate also makes the ratings relevant to us as a marker for improvement. So use it as you will, but I'm going to keep up with it personally for our benefit.
These are the new rankings I got
Arby 1350
Chamberlin 1215
Ace 1215
VTS 1215
Yoshiman 1050
Seif 990
Neo 900
Keeping the sample size small puts more weight on the immediate goal - improving against each other. We can get a whole lot better in-state because of the variety among us, and our ratings will directly reflect those changes after every biweekly. A universal rating is useful for other, less personal reasons, so I support you using our data as well.How does using a universal system make them less applicable to use as a benchmark for improvement?
The new ones look much better.
![]()