A clone? Of who? Samus? Who blurted THIS blasphemy? I can take Lucario being a clone of Mewtwo, but Mewtwo...
Ohhhh, I see. It was a trick question.
Mewtwo is a clone of Mew.
Sorry for the misunderstanding.
(He IS badace, though.
![Wink ;) ;)]()
)
Hmm. My opinion on this kind of thinking clashes with... this kind of thinking.
There are two ways you can look at it.
1) Mewtwo is a bad character.
This seems to be the most supported view, and rightfully so, if you can't play a character as casually as, say, a rampant Fox or Marth, then that makes them horrid.
However...
2) You (the player) need work.
That's right, You. The player. For most, this would be considered a matter of pride. How good are YOU at Mewtwo? Is Mewtwo really a horrible, horrible character, or are you just not good with him?
Truth be told, I love to play as Mewtwo... As such, he's become one of my better characters. But I completely SUCK as Fox. Fox AND Marth. But why is it I cannot call those two "bad characters"? I can't win matches with them. They must be bad!
...You get my point hopefully. >.>
Again, something I've noted for the longest time, two completely clashing views.
Mewtwo supporters (and the users of the lower tiers) seem to go more for 2.
Others, preferring not to give that much thought into the whole process, normally go with 1.
Both seem reasonable enough. Guess it's just a matter of taste (and pride).
...In any which case, for the sake of casual playing, a reworked Mewtwo for Smash Bros. 4.
And PLEASE bring back some of the older N64 stages. Those were fun, too. ):