Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
No, wouldn't it be ok to update one or tow of his moves for Galaxy or whatever SMB game we get later down the line? Not chane him completely, but like how the Fludd was added for the sake of Super Mario Sunshine, why not give Mario and SMGalaxy or whatever futre Mario game-inspired attack(s)?
10 letters.
1. Animal Crossing and Megaman
Not Star Bits for Mario. Using Fireball would work with Mario's side smash.
Ooh, that first bit sounds good. Maybe they could just make a full-blown tag team battle mode. Make taunt switch out to another character of choice. Just as long as switching wasn't like it is now with PT or Zelda/Sheik, i.e. epically slow, and inconsistently so. But it has serious potential for fun. And who knows, it could become a viable tournament mode. But there is so much potential for awesome lineups. You could use so many Pokemon in one match... And a Fire Emblem only team would be fearful. Mario + Luigi, MK and DeDeDe, Ness and Lucas, all the epic pairs could do some serious epic damage.
), King K. Rool, Knuckles the Echidna
None of the games actually had that spin. It was, however, blatantly inspired by the many flips, spins and acrobatic moves of Mario in SM64.
Have you played SMW? There's a spin attack right in it. Check it out. If anything, its the cape move that was made up, since he never just swings it out in front of him. Still, it seems completely pointless to take out his spin move, replace it with a move that doesn't do damage, and then give him a new spinning move that doesn't do damage, but making it replace a completely unrelated move. Its really not a good idea, and the only way it'd make sense if it just replaced teh FLUDD, and made Mario go back to the status quo, instead of some inane sense of balance between the games that you're trying to propose. Remember, Smash isn't just about what's new, it also remembers what's old. At this point, there's no correlation between Mario's moves and how recent his games are, so you should stop trying to probe at that.
When he spins on a big Goomba twice, he kills it, when he spins on weak foes, he kills it, when he spins on Bowser when his tail is on fire the he spins in his shell then when Mario spins he damage Bowser. So... have you even played Galaxy's before?
That's largely due to the fact that Sakurai isn't actually trying to make the game better by any means. He just wants more people to play it. Being that scubs largely outnumber the amount of people that take this game(s) seriously, I think that his appeal to them is much more important than his appeal to us.
When he spins on a big Goomba twice, he kills it, when he spins on weak foes, he kills it, when he spins on Bowser when his tail is on fire the he spins in his shell then when Mario spins he damage Bowser. So... have you even played Galaxy's before?
Overall, a bit too many characters, and some strange choices. >_>
I'd rather have Glitz Pit. Rawk Hawk FTW!
I'd actually rather have Rawk Hawk and Dimentio with no Paper Mario.
Paper Mario is not a main part of the series like Toon Link is for the Zelda series.
What I would love to know, is why does Sakurai have a grudge against competitive players?
Because Sakurai is an anti-competetive man. Just be glad that he kept the option to turn off items and didn't turn it into Mario Party or Mario Kart.
Well, that is the rule for just about all the games, you play for fun, if you play to win, your just basicly wasting your life and you could do so much more.
Your talking about a guy that plays three controlers at once, make it seem like three people are playing and not scurbly playing... I think he's more competive then anyone will ever be.
