No... he said jiggs has advantageous stages, and fox does not.So... What you are saying is fox has a bad matchup? or are they just 50:50's lol. the first part says all 50:50, but then you say Jiggs beats fox.
Careful what you say btw, =]
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
No... he said jiggs has advantageous stages, and fox does not.So... What you are saying is fox has a bad matchup? or are they just 50:50's lol. the first part says all 50:50, but then you say Jiggs beats fox.
Careful what you say btw, =]
Opinion. A last resort would be more than a ban, way more.Why hasnt yuna come in here and destroyed the idea of a temp ban yet... really you would think after 5 polls of the idea being tarnished you guys would just skip the theactrics.
Also remember banning a character is a LAST resort.
/SUPPORTBleh forget it. It's not important. Brawl talk time.
--------------------------
If it's ok with everyone, How about I rewrite up my temp ban proposal. As far as this goes, this is the most agreement we are getting on the situation. I think we need to stop bashing each other, and start compromising.
If everyone is up to it, I'll rewrite it. From there, we can come t an understanding on what to look for, and how to go about this properly without jeopardizing the community.
Again, I ask for your input.
you wouldn't see it so much if you would just answer it =]
Snake might win the MK MU if Green Greens was legal and RC was banned. He almost certainly would if Eldin was legal. Point?Jiggs does beat Fox slightly with the rules right now. On neutrals, the MU is stage dependent. Fox wins cuz of Green Greens and Corneria, which are off now, but Brinstar is still legal. I think Jiggs has a small advantage because of current ruleset (stages mostly). That doesn't mean it's a bad MU, it's just a gay one
So... wouldn't that mean that Jiggs has the advantage?No... he said jiggs has advantageous stages, and fox does not.
What's more "last resort" than a character Ban?Opinion. A last resort would be more than a ban, way more.
Care to explain in further detail Jason?^ wtf
no, what banning a character does is completely screw over every MK player with no remorse. Even if I didn't use MK I could not support that
edit - having an advantage does not mean it's a bad MU
If it's that bad then why does M2K pick Fox over his Marth I just don't understandWell, if jiggs wins, then it kind of is a bad MU. Not bad as in "OMG CP LAWLZ" but just in jiggs favor.
Just wanted to clarify that you did say earlier that you discredited someone for saying that he possibly has an unfavorable MU, and tech. by your words, he does.
Just saying xP
I dont either, which is why i am asking.If it's that bad then why does M2K pick Fox over his Marth I just don't understand
care to go into explanation with each character as to why they might have a small advantage/ even scenario. Of course, I want full details. with that I can properly analyze the information you are giving to the community and see if there is any proper solutions.Diddy beats MK on neutrals, Falco goes even w/ MK on neutrals, and the WHOBO rules that Xyro has has Snake having a small advantage vs MK. Without a gay counterpick, ICs do fine vs MK too. Wario/Falco even get to pick Jungle Japes where Wario never dies and Falco can CG to spike or run away forever.
You run into Sheiks?M2K, does the term "outlier" mean anything to you?
Also, in melee, there were 4-6 chars where you either knew the matchup or you lost. Not one. You were guaranteed to run into a few peaches, a few foxes, a few sheiks... not 5-6 foxes in brackets, and maybe one CF.
Also, fox had weaknesses and, arguably, bad matchups.
Come on we all know that's just blowing smoke. Fox is just too fast, he can bait jiggs too well and punish whatever she does hard. We're seeing a resurgence of great Jiggs players atm, but I don't think it will last forever.Uh, you say yourself that Fox loses to Jiggs, and we all know Fox being gimpable is his weakness.
Because MBR is conservative as hell ATM.Why did they take off coneria?
I don't see why this is such a huge problem.Also, MK is also, by a long shot, the most dominant in the game.
I'm not really anybody, but a temp ban doesn't seem bad at all.Stop with the Melee guys. You are all straying off topic.
Btw, I need more answers for this. Ty for the people who responded alrady:
If it's ok with everyone, How about I rewrite up my temp ban proposal. As far as this goes, this is the most agreement we are getting on the situation. I think we need to stop bashing each other, and start compromising.
If everyone is up to it, I'll rewrite it. From there, we can come t an understanding on what to look for, and how to go about this properly without jeopardizing the community.
Again, I ask for your input.
you wouldn't see it so much if you would just answer it =]
*sigh*Stop with the Melee guys. You are all straying off topic.
Btw, I need more answers for this. Ty for the people who responded alrady:
If it's ok with everyone, How about I rewrite up my temp ban proposal. As far as this goes, this is the most agreement we are getting on the situation. I think we need to stop bashing each other, and start compromising.
If everyone is up to it, I'll rewrite it. From there, we can come t an understanding on what to look for, and how to go about this properly without jeopardizing the community.
Again, I ask for your input.
you wouldn't see it so much if you would just answer it =]
If it makes you feel any better I will always feel that it's unfair to you. Not most others though.MK doesn't deserve a ban or a temp ban at all. You guys only want that because it will be easier for all of you who don't use him. I think this is very unfair, and I hope you guys will realize how hard you would be screwing it for the rest of us who legitimately studied or practiced hard with MK to just disallow him because you don't like him.
i agree that we do need this. but i wasn't really putting any attention in it because i'm not very important.People aren't willing to listen anymore, I've been screaming, "community consensus, compromise" since day one of this thread.
Don't be ridiculous M2K.. I love MK and I main him (but who cares cus I suck). I watched the whole Kirby show just because he was in it.MK doesn't deserve a ban or a temp ban at all. You guys only want that because it will be easier for all of you who don't use him. I think this is very unfair, and I hope you guys will realize how hard you would be screwing it for the rest of us who legitimately studied or practiced hard with MK to just disallow him because you don't like him.
yea, which is why I am just repeatedly asking until people get the hint that their petty bickering isn't going no where xD. They will stop eventually, it always happens. It just that something new pops up and sparks them, so I am hoping this will be the next spark.*sigh*
People aren't willing to listen anymore, I've been screaming, "community consensus, compromise" since day one of this thread. I've gotten several people to listen, but most people just care about being right at this point.
So, while I agree that a temp ban would be interesting for data gathering purposes, I don't think people give a rat's *** about what the data says anymore.
When you put it that way, I actually don't want a temp ban.It's not even those "bad matchups" though. Everyone flocks to MK because he's easier to use at a lower level and everyone talking about him makes people want to use him as 2ndaries. I don't mind this at all personally, in fact I like fighting MK, but these are the primary reasons. As for the top results go among MKs, about 80% of those MKs are ones I trained specifically. Ksizl and Tyrant especially (and housed with DSF for 3 weeks, and talk to Havok on aim often). I trained or helped out a lot at least 8-10 of the dominant MKs today, and my results are a lot higher than theirs always, yet I still lose a lot. I do not see him as being a super dominant character at high level, but no one is that good yet at this game just like no one was good at Melee first 2 years. The top of the metagame still only has one MK that wins everything and that's me. Tyrant is arguably 2nd best MK and he loses to DEHF most of the time, while Dojo got 4th losing to Hylian and Razor. I helped them get a lot better (more so Tyrant than Dojo, but both of them) and they are the next most dominant, so I do not think this character is that broken. I think you all either overreact to it, or just want him to be gone so you do better in tourney. I hope when you guys end up voting for pro ban you understand how unfair it is to the people who practiced hard with the character to get screwed over for doing nothing wrong
But why should he have to pick up a different character that he might not enjoy playing just because there are so many whiners who don't like MK? That doesn't make any sense and it's stupidIf you are indeed a top player and as good as people think you are, then picking up 1 of the MANY other viable characters will result in your placings being generally the same.
What the hell does this have to do with the argumentM2K, just because I see you post the exact same thing often, do you have those posts saved to a notepad or something?