Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
In other words... For anti-ban to prove that ADHD and Ally aren't outliers, they need to show other Diddies and Snakes who can win against all other top MKs on a regular basis? Or at least as much as the MU ratio tells us they should be winning? I agree with the message if it's what I'm understanding. If not, elaborate a bit more if you can.This is a trap, but not a good trap; if you're wanting to convince someone to say "Yeah, those things shouldn't be happening!" you'd need to follow it up with more than an analysis on a small, local level (such as their fights vs. M2K, or just how ADHD or Ally does against MK in general, etc., etc.); the only way to counteract the statement and say they SHOULD be happening would be to show a trend that shows a change towards that direction.
OS: THink he was trollin?Originally Posted by Omni View Post
so i've done some more research. that data makes sense. i'm officially pro-ban
LOL. Word.They See Me Trollinnn
They Hatteeeinnnnn
In a nutshell, yes. It isn't quite that simple though; they don't necessarily have to have people mimicking ADHD and Ally, but need to find trends from Snake and Diddy as a whole that they are as tournament viable as MK and that they do as well against MK as people would need them to if they were considered an "even" or "counter" matchup. It'd take a lot of effort though, and even with all the data necessary it would be incomplete data and the best you'd get is "I think this trend is going up", so I don't blame someone for not doing it.In other words... For anti-ban to prove that ADHD and Ally aren't outliers, they need to show other Diddies and Snakes who can win against all other top MKs on a regular basis? Or at least as much as the MU ratio tells us they should be winning? I agree with the message if it's what I'm understanding. If not, elaborate a bit more if you can.
Scrooging has yet to be seen to be a issue in tournaments in any way. For Metaknight to be "scrooging" effectively, he has to be on Smashville. If MK has to grab the ledge, he's in trouble; whenever you put an obvious destination point in your trajectory you can be stopped. Some stages, like FD, make it near impossible for many characters to reach the edge. Others, such as Battlefield, allow you to walk there before he gets back.And you lost nothing, practically. Lots of discussion about scrooging and why no one has banned it yet outright, and explaining the "why's" of the rules.
Are you asking me what my variable would be if MK was being banned for dominance reasons and I wanted him banned for dominance reasons?If MK is going to be banned from dominance, how can you determine what "too dominant" is? Normally this is opinion from person to person, but would there be any way to prove that X dominance is where to draw the line?
Classic strawmanning lolIf MK is going to be banned from how lame he was, how can you determine what "too lame" is? Normally this is opinion from person to person, but would there be any way to prove that X lame is where to draw the line?
A straw man argument is an informal fallacy based on misrepresentation of an opponent's position. I was using my statement as hyperbole to put him in the same position I was; his question was merely a loaded question, and neither of them were strawmen.Classic strawmanning lol
Fine.can we get, like, a percentage, on the completeness of your "see? MK is broken." video?
I think what me means is that picking MK stops any sort of open-ended approach from the opponent. Your options are literally "pick MK" or "pick a disadvantaged matchup". This is not the case with others. I could be mistaken though.You aren't getting it, which just shows me how stubborn you are. There's really no point in debating with you if you won't even acknowledge other people's points. AGAIN: You said that in order for a match INVOLVING MK to be completely based on skill, the other player must pick MK. This is obviously true, as MK obviously has the same tools as himself. This is true for EVERY SINGLE CHARACTER IN BRAWL. I don't see how MK is any different. If you want a truly skill-based match, then a ditto is obviously the best option for that.
I don't think you understood my response. If you can answer my question, I can answer yours.I was hoping to get an actual answer since you're like, Overswarm, and thought you'd be on top of things more than anyone else. You don't need some absolute definate answer, but something at least general would be better than nothing.
O.o Hey Overswarm. Recruiting more Pro bans I see.I don't think you understood my response. If you can answer my question, I can answer yours.
(and to your response to my previous statement, yes, that's the point)
I don't think I saw anything out of the ordinary in that entire thing. Were you trying to point out the very end?
Well that makes a bit more sense.I think what me means is that picking MK stops any sort of open-ended approach from the opponent. Your options are literally "pick MK" or "pick a disadvantaged matchup". This is not the case with others. I could be mistaken though.
Notice how sometimes MK is running farther than dashdance allows him to turn around laglessly, but he still is able to come to a complete stop without putting up the shield or anything? I'm pretty sure that's the AT he's talking about.I don't think I saw anything out of the ordinary in that entire thing. Were you trying to point out the very end?
I'm able to put a stop to my initial dash animation with no lag or animation; my character simply pops into neutral. It's basically shield dropping without the shield.I don't think I saw anything out of the ordinary in that entire thing. Were you trying to point out the very end?
You would draw the line at the point where MK is so lame that it makes the game unplayable for the user. The point where the line would be crossed is the point that an MK main would be miserable and commit suicide from the sheer displeasure from maining MK, as playing such a lame character needs to prove that he has drained the very will to live with his lameness.If MK is going to be banned from how lame he was, how can you determine what "too lame" is? Normally this is opinion from person to person, but would there be any way to prove that X lame is where to draw the line?
Finally, I've been looking for these videos for a while! Of course, I never entered the Marth boards or the older threads because I was using laziness as my excuse, but here they are! Ohoho, laziness has won yet again.Brawl only allows you to dashdance the same distance as the maximum you can move for a stutter step. It's not exactly anything new to circumvent its distance with a foxtrot instead.
In fact, doing so isn't even limited to one method.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_4tmLsflA_c
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PXXIyk_Fb6M
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bg61XaQvqMo
Just wait. The full implementation hasn't been shown yet. ^_^Brawl only allows you to dashdance the same distance as the maximum you can move for a stutter step. It's not exactly anything new to circumvent its distance with a foxtrot instead.
In fact, doing so isn't even limited to one method.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_4tmLsflA_c
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PXXIyk_Fb6M
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bg61XaQvqMo
Call me stupid, but I can't see too big a difference between a misrepresentation and an exaggeration. The two seem to be rather similar.A straw man argument is an informal fallacy based on misrepresentation of an opponent's position. I was using my statement as hyperbole to put him in the same position I was; his question was merely a loaded question, and neither of them were strawmen.
Well duh, it's usable by every character.... So of course every character will BENEFIT from it... Just... Some will benefit more than others.... <.<hmmmm... looks interesting. and dangerous. although i'm sure there are other characters that can benefit from this.
that's the point.Well duh, it's usable by every character.... So of course every character will BENEFIT from it... Just... Some will benefit more than others.... <.<
That's true. A strawman is generally not just an exaggeration though. With a strawman you should (for the most part, I guess) be able to say "that's not what I'm saying at all" but with an exaggeration you should be able to say "you're blowing things out of proportion"Call me stupid, but I can't see too big a difference between a misrepresentation and an exaggeration. The two seem to be rather similar.
First thing I checked. I got excited.that's the point.
this might be the AT that makes MK containable.
inb4he'salreadycontainable.
__________________
It's very likely that he is just trolling us. If he actually did switch sides now, I'd be very very VERY surprised.God, 10 pages of new stuff when I get back. I'll just jump back in on the discussion when I find something to comment on.
Is Omni really pro-ban now?
Flying under the stage to bypass the Ledgegrab Limit.Could someone explain to me EXACTLY what scrooging consists of? I'm a bit unclear on the term.
I've only seen it done efficiently on Smashville (which might cause debate over its nuetrality, but that's a different story) and of course with MK the most since he has superior jumps.Flying under the stage to bypass the Ledgegrab Limit.
Wow. That's really effin gay.Flying under the stage to bypass the Ledgegrab Limit.
I actually like it when they glide under the stage.That's so terrible though. Smashville is my favorite stage. It's like melee FD, but better.
Leave it to MK to gay it up.
You mean tripping?bickering about a problem that Sakurai himself intended to troll us all with from the beginning