In response to the (as usual) disagreements about the PR update,
I'm going to make ONE, and one effort only, to make peace here.
I don't honestly expect anything good to come from this, but here goes:
The tournaments used:
TheGreatestMeleeTournamentSinceBrawlCameOut
G4S5
Reflex's Mega Fun Smash Challenge Session
Pound 3
NOYS(Soft's house tournament
7- FullMetal
7- Cornel
However, after some digging(because the PR update was neglected for so long) I found THESE tournaments that could have/should have been used in the PR update:
Smashfest/Tournaments in SC
October 27th Waba games melee tournament
1st - carter (split pot)
2nd - xif
3rd - fmtl
4th - marty
5th - chris
5th - 112
doubles
1st - 112/carter
2nd - xif/fmtl
3rd - laijin/rakyu
4th - sleepyk/elliot
Smash Or Die 5
UNCP 2008 (tournament in North Carolina)
Singles:
1- L0ZR
2- Chaddd
3- I'veJihadIt
4- Soft
5- XIF
5- FullMetal
7- Cornel
Doubles:
1. GBC (GPC) FACE CRUSHERS(Chaddd+FullMetal)
2. WE REPRESENT THE LOLLIPOP GUILD(XIF+PB&J)
3. NC CATFISH
4. AXEL ROSE FAN CLUB
5. THE TRUTH--> ON OUR GROWN MAN STATUS --> MY TEAM
5. **** KINGS
7. NC NY --> DAMA'S TEAM
7. TRI-FORCE
9. STFE
9. THE UNICORN MUFFINS
9. KARN & JOHN (SORRY KARN)
9. DOUBLE DOC
13. DOC-FONON --> FONON'S TEAM
I don't remember after that ... >.<
I move that the panel reconvene, and re-discuss the PR, BUT according to
these new guidelines:
1. The PR will be based upon tournament rankings(both singles AND doubles),
with consideration to skill. (Implying that the panel has discretion to place one player above another if they feel that player is better than another), and attendance.
2. Attendance will be determined as is necessary, allowing each player to miss 1 or 2 smash tournaments with no consequence. However, missing more than 2 tournaments that have 5 or more of the top 10 in attendance,
will result in a drop in rank on the PR.
3. A "tier 2" will be added, consisting of a maximum of 5 members, THIS list's members are to be decided solely by the panel's opinions of them, given that they were
a. considered for the top 10 but did not place well enough
or
b. the panelists all agree that the player has a high enough skill level to be worth mentioning
4. Only
IN STATE tournaments or OUT OF STATE TOURNAMENTS WITH 5 OF THE TOP 10 IN ATTENDANCE, regardless of size on a national basis, should be counted towards the making of the PR. This is the GEORGIA power rankings, not the "Georgia and people from other states" power rankings.
(Placing well at out of state tournaments is great, but does not help in comparing a player's skill to other top players in their state)
Now, back to the current situation at hand-
@DruggedFox and TheOneJanitor: stfu please? Neither of you is on a panel, and you are not in the discussions we have. The way the GA PR operates based on its current criteria, is solely by tournament placings, but someone still has to confirm the accuracy of the placings, and look at the brackets to determine if a player's rank reflects their skill.
No offense to either of you, I'm not making this statement as a personal attack. But your posts repeating the same things without any first hand knowledge, is not helping the situation here.
@Chaddd- The deciding reason for you being put at #2, was the OOS tournaments.
I'll be frank, I'd put you at #1, based on the criteria that your record is better IN state.
But the panel doesn't consist of just me, its myself, Dogy, 112, and Mike G. My personal opinion can't sway the whole panel's decision very much.
@Carter- Yes you're better than me. <3
But I don't intend for it to stay that way
Again, to recap:
I want to re-evaluate the PR, using the "new" tournament results I've found, and according to the new rules for creating the power rankings.
Support/criticism/comments about my suggestion for the new way to evaluate the PR?
Consensus on PR re-do?