Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
It may not have the title, the North American Tier List, but the Official BBR Tier Lists have been constructed mostly based on examinations of the North American metagame done mostly by North Americans. Until this tier list, there didn't seem to be much influence from regions outside of North America. The major change in this tier list, Olimar's jump to second, was undeniably the result of Nietono's second place finish at APEX2012 and previous successes in Japan, but I think this decision was made too hastily because Olimar players have not performed at a level that warrants Olimar's placement on this tier list since APEX2012. (I think Olimar is top tier but not second after Metaknight.) After APEX, Nietono continued to place well in East Japan, but his dominance seems to be over.This is not the North American Tier List though.
So people list that even Samus is better than Luigi now? Wow, things certainly do change when you don't pay attention to the Brawl meta game for a couple of years.Bottom:
G:
H:
I agree with you there, and I never liked the fact that the list was composed of named tiers with 1-3 lettered subtiers each. We really don't need that many tiers.Just a note To anybody making a tier list of their own. There honestly isnt more than 5-6 seperate tiers of viability (including one of mk by himself so 4-5 w/o him) for all the characters in the game
Characters that are expected to win tournaments
Characters that dont surprise you when they win tournaments.
Characters that DO surprise you when they win tournaments
Characters that really shouldnt be winning tournaments.
And characters that dont/wont win tourments.
I've seen Oli vs Fox, and it's not bad at allI don't see how could be argued as better then either having a ton of -3's and -2's. Anyone ever seen / vs ? Those 2 matchups are terrifying to watch as gets limited incredibly. And those aren't even his death matchups.
The idea that Marth only has "two or three slight disadvantages and is even or slightly beats everybody else" has proven to be untrue numerous times. Marth loses noticeably to MK, has a disadvantage to ICs and DDD as well. ROB / Sonic both have favorable tourney records against Marth - arguing the match-ups to not be in ROB / Sonic's favor is arguing against facts. If you go strictly by tournament results [which I prefer to do, especially when a lot of results are at hand] then Marth has at least 5 match-ups that are in the opponent's favor.I don't know how you can expect Falco to win tournaments but you don't expect Marth to win tournaments, when Falco has 2 hard counters to get by (and MK is either even or slight disadvantage for him) and goes even/slightly beats all the other relevant characters, whereas Marth has 2-3 slight disadvantages and goes even/slightly beats all other relevant characters.
Mfw noI agree with you there, and I never liked the fact that the list was composed of named tiers with 1-3 lettered subtiers each. We really don't need that many tiers.
Here's my attempt at a five-tier list.
Top:
High:
Mid:
Low:
Bottom:
Cuz Marth players are badI don't know how you can expect Falco to win tournaments but you don't expect Marth to win tournaments
From observations/results. doesn't do better vs as long as a LGL is in place if we're using a +/- scale. In terms of a real ratio does better then . They're both -3 matchups, but 's is more 2-8 while :rob's is 3-7.Wolf is suprisingly good against pika for some reason xD
I think wolf goes even with IC's (at best really, I played an IC recently and almost lost cuz i can space perfectly and hit one climber whereas the other powershields and grabs because im in hitlag or whatever its called. That really made me feel like the MU's an entire gamble that skewes in IC's favor)...whereas rob beats ic's with +1 or something
Gull, honestly, where do you get your matchup numbers from? I do realize rob - diddy is pretty bad, but I don't really feel like wolf - diddy is much good either. And if people consider OCEAN - ADHD, they should consider OCEAN - m2k as well.
Btw honestly I also think rob does better vs d3 than wolf. Wolf's way to grab, easier to mess with offstage. Fox just destroys d3. Weird.
Everything Gheb said was true.The problem with your estimations is - as silly as it may sound - that the term "tournament" is vague. If somebody wins an absolute scrub-tourney with Ganon then the surprise-factor is hardly there. Where do you draw the line here? What tournaments are elegible?
The idea that Marth only has "two or three slight disadvantages and is even or slightly beats everybody else" has proven to be untrue numerous times. Marth loses noticeably to MK, has a disadvantage to ICs and DDD as well. ROB / Sonic both have favorable tourney records against Marth - arguing the match-ups to not be in ROB / Sonic's favor is arguing against facts. If you go strictly by tournament results [which I prefer to do, especially when a lot of results are at hand] then Marth has at least 5 match-ups that are in the opponent's favor.
Falco has one hard-counter [ICs] and one really diffcult match-up [Pikachu] and that's it. Not only does he not really lose to any other characters but arguments have been made that Falco beats Olimar [backed up by results on numerous occasions], Diddy Kong [hard to say] and Snake [unlikely and pretty much proven wrong by tourney results; still even though].
Falco is definitely better than Marth. Depending on how you much you wanna read into his worse match-up you can argue him to be as good as 4th and about as low as 6th but he will always be a better character than Marth.
Probably some Japan stuff.Z, you make it sound like Falco is easy to use at top level. :\
Gheb, I was unaware that ROB and Sonic had a winning record against Marth...which ROBs and Sonics have beaten which Marths? :S (I'm assuming that the ICs' favourable record over Marth is due to 9B lol)
The 2-3 disadvantageous MUs I was referring to for Marth were MK, DDD and Diddy, with Diddy being the possibly-even one.
Also, going strictly by results doesn't really make any sense because it rules out the possibility of players losing even/slightly advantageous MUs due to being outplayed by the opponent.
I don't know actually. I've never played Vinnie in tourney. I'm 2-1 with you this year. McPP is 1-0 vs Esam's . JJwolf lost to Vinnie's game 3 in 2011 in some hype set !Seagull,
When was the last time a high profile IC beat a high profile Wolf in tournament?outside of mine and Kain's fluke
I can name you quite a few high profile Wolf's beating a few high profile ICs
Holms beat Dojo too, but I think that was when Dojo used .Kain is 2-1 as well with me and he beat Dojo at Whobo. He's also beaten every other IC player since the dawn of time.
Just saying. Results seem to indicate that it's either even to wolf's favor. In my opinion, it's probably +3 wolf's favor though
+3's .Therefore, I win the argument
Wolf beats ICs just as bad as Rob does
If I see you say "Wolf is -1 with ICs again" I swear to god I'm picking up DDD. Don't make me do it
Thats almost as ridiculous as saying Bowser goes even with ICs.
*co-signs*Bowser DOES go even with ICs >_>
Ask Vinnie. We broke the MU down and are scared when people find out the truth
Disappointed with this tbh :/
At least he remembered to put Kirby.^ Oh look, its my list only with different tier separations, a few minor 1-2 spot changes, Ness higher, and 2 Kirbies.
It involves perfect spacing with fire breath, amirite? FIRE BEATS ICE!Bowser DOES go even with ICs >_>
Ask Vinnie. We broke the MU down and are scared when people find out the truth