I'm glad that my chart got resurfaced and got the light it should have gotten.
Street Fighter does it's tier list in a very systematic manner. Add up the matchups and group them based on the results. In the matter I did, groups of 10 made lists. (except when getting to real low tier where the numbers became erratically bad)
When I added up all the numbers I actually did Diddy's recount twice, mostly since I was in disbelief, but with a character that really isn't a counter to anyone and just an overall good character it makes sense. In the actual world of competitive street fighter, you dont see everyone running to chun li/m bison/e honda, which are on the very top of the list. The tier list is the potential of the character overall in the game, not just "whats used in tournament."
Also used this list as a wake-up call to show everyone they're wrong on many matchups.
I am personally not in favor of an opinionated list based based on "who's the top player using and who is winning with what"
If mew2king all of a sudden picked up like pit and started winning nationals with pit, would that make pit s-tier material? Way too much bias is put into the list, mostly because there are two layers of opinions going into the list. First is the matchup, which is a middleground in the opinions of the members of both mains. Then with all these "opinions" floating around, the back room then decides and makes opinions on where characters should be based on tournament winnings/top player usage/and placings. You have people biased on who they like and their character, which in turn gives a double bias if this said person bumped their character matchups more into their favor. Tournament results also skew it, since I believe player skill =/= character skill. Ally has won INTO money with c.falcon a terrible character. Ally's player skill is well above everyone else, and he can use whoever he wants and still place well, but he just chooses to play a character who has an easier time with everyone.