OK, first about people not using their "mains." Basically, and someone else stated this beforehand, you've essentially taken away someone's opportunity to beat you playing seriously, which I don't think is fair to let go as a "match that didn't happen" considering rankings. If you win, it's no big deal, since that means you'll beat them with your main anyway. If you lose with your alternate character, then you lost. The other guy does not get credit for beating your main, but it does mean he is at least as good as your secondaries, but how MUCH better we don't know, since you never gave him a chance with your main. Now, everyone on the panel has a different weight attached to this. That's why it's a panel, and not one guy cranking out a formula. We represent an amalgamation of the spectrum of opinions of the community.
I refuse to let people coast on their historical victories of 6 months ago, including Mr. Bob Dollars. If you don't prove your ****e, then other people who DO will move up. Again THIS DOES NOT MEAN BEING INACTIVE (or using non-main characters) MAKES YOU MOVE DOWN. It means that you gave up opportunities to prove yourself compared to people who are improving fast compared to the pace of the overall community. If by some strange chance everyone below you noobs out while you use Roy or Zelda or whatever, chances are you won't go down. But if a whole bunch of Falcomists and Foxroars show up really quick, you're going down a couple spots. I don't get why people have such a hard time understanding this concept. If you say something like "we all know X should have happened or that Y is better," either provide recent evidence, or prove it, else i'm not going to hear any of it. Some people who I thought needed to man up did so at UCLA, and it did not go unnoticed.
And Bob, as for people trying to pimp their own records on the boards, that's why we have panelists whose job it is to be knowledgeable enough to see through the BS.
Zel:
GANNON-BANNED
I'll post more later if you're all still arguing about things that have already been explained by the time I get back to school next week.