How?
^ Exactly.
I don't see how it's harsh to say I'd want a clone that's an individual rather than a unique character who's just an alternate version of one we already have.
Mario is my favorite series and the first two Paper Mario games are some of my favorite games of all time. But....if I wanna play as Mario in Smash, I'll just use the one we have. Majora's Mask was a great game, but the two Links do a fine job of representing all the Links in the series.
I acknowledged in my first post about all of this that Paper Mario is one of the best choices for a Mario newcomer remaining. I wouldn't hate to see him and would prefer him over some of the suggestions people have made, but at the same time, Mario really doesn't need any more characters. At least in SSB4. Rosalina and Bowser Jr were enough in my opinion.
I just wanna see some new faces.
No offense, brah, but you're not exactly the most impartial judge for this type of thing.
I don't think the "proportions" shared between Marth and Roy are similar enough to make them more samey than the Links. If you showed the three Links to someone, they'd probably guess straight away that they're different versions of the same guy. Pretty sure nobody would think Marth and Roy are one in the same.
huh.....how to put this.
Going to be extremely honest. The mario franchise didn;t need rosalina, bowser jr and dr mario. If you consider the franchise itself, the main 4 were enough.
It doesn;t mean however that it's bad to have them.
See, it's like the difference between an addition that is expanding how reflected the mario franchise is and what would be redundancy. Redundancy is basically where you reflect something already reflected. The problem is you have to kinda define what would be redundancy and the thing is, there's no such things as "we need less toon link", saying this means that at one point, every addition would be redundancy. It's certainly not the case now (kkr, isaac and many others), but it does mean that at one point, every addition would be pointless.
The reason toon link is there has to do with how the style of zelda became to be interesting to split both style into 2 separate delagate. Repping wise, there isn;t much redundancy, the only thing being that they are both links, but ALONE does this fact matter THAT much considering how they reflect something different?
In fact, you still told me one thing: you pretty much care about the character himself before the rest. This is why I have a hard time to get it, what's so wrong to have another link if there's actually reaosns to distinguish him? The worse is that using toon link to compare paper mario tbh, is extremely inaccurate, paper mario has more distinction actually and again, they are "related" to a character (i say related because tbh, with paper jam, you can;t tell he's the same mario, you can tell his origin are from him however).
What I seem to even less get is that despite this being your perception, what I got is that nintendo actually tries to shows how different both mario and paper mario are. If they are even trying, I just don;t know why it's still a problem to have him.
What i'm trying to tell you is you are discarding him for reasons that seems to not matter much. How seriously does the feel of the character, moveset, what he would reflect, diversity contribution matters less than the character itself?
Tbh, i feel the chrom case kinda tells you a bit. Chrom was considered but discarded because although his subset was an addition, the feel of him and his possible moveset would reflect a bit of redundancy in the roster (according to Sakurai at least). This is why I think robin would have been chosen, not much redundancy, the subset was still awakening related, but what changed is the delegate ONLY to make sense. To me, this shows that in the end, I hardly believe that the character itself > anything else. You migh not like these semiclone all you want, but saying they don;t add much in the roster is a bit of a stretch.
And lastly, it;s not even accurate again. You put paper mario on the same level as dr mario and toon link, both semi clones. It's not even the same way you would compare characters as it;s honestly VERY unatural to think paper mario as semiclone, the character itself just happens to feel unatural to his counterpart and actually, that improves the "original character" thinking you would want in the first place.
I think people honestly put too much value into "looking different" instead of focusing on "being different".