Capybara Gaming
Just Vibing
Jesus Christ, I was not aware of the "incident" ya'll were talking about. And Ember was one of my favorite members of Danny's rogue's gallery too... Sheesh.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I remember that not only the shooting but there was something called "Ember's Ghost Squad" featuring violent Flash animation cartoons in which a squad of ghosts who seek out suicidal people and recruit them. The show itself was a fan-made spin-off of the Danny Phantom, and based off of the character Ember McLain.Jesus Christ, I was not aware of the "incident" ya'll were talking about. And Ember was one of my favorite members of Danny's rogue's gallery too... Sheesh.
Still, I wouldn't let that hurt your opinion of the character (not that I'm accusing you of doing so). The incident is still very obscure overall.Jesus Christ, I was not aware of the "incident" ya'll were talking about. And Ember was one of my favorite members of Danny's rogue's gallery too... Sheesh.
As far as I can tell they have literally never aired on Nickelodeon (though they have occasionally aired on CN) but that will not stop me from giving respect to my cheesy boysStill, I wouldn't let that hurt your opinion of the character (not that I'm accusing you of doing so). The incident is still very obscure overall.
Also, while being unable to fall asleep tonight I had an interesting thought. An entry or two down the line, the idea of Smash-esque Third Party characters comes to mind for a lot of people. But how would that be defined in this case? I had my own ideas for it along with a few examples of who we could get out of it.
The main criteria in this case would be Characters/franchises not owned by Nickelodeon, but aired on Nickelodeon at some point during their run, some of which are still associated with Nickelodeon. Especially since it's called Nickelodeon All Star Brawl (so one can't play the "It's not just [Inset first party here] all-stars anymore! It's MORE than that!" card often played in Smash speculation to justify characters with no connection to Nintendo), and Nickelodeon has no real reason to promote their competitors in their game (so no Steven Universe or Luz Owl House, no doubt who'd be popular requests under other sets of criteria). The show has to have a connection to Nickelodeon. So under these criteria, who do you think would be chosen?
Peanuts - Gonna start with a bit of an oddball here but hear me out! :3 Peanuts does have a collection to Nick through You're on Nickelodeon, Charlie Brown!, and umbrella program that aired most animated Peanuts specials on Nick until 2004. Furthermore, one might think a comic strip character like Charlie Brown or Snoopy would be out of place. But by the time this would be considered we'll more than likely have Garfield in the game, who is also a comic strip character. So the chosen Peanuts rep won't feel so out of place! The only issue here is that Peanuts typically isn't associated with Nickelodeon despite this connection.
Tak and the Power of Juju - Tak was THQ's mascot for awhile (and a rare example of a character who technically qualifies for both this and Smash) and Nick produced a TV show for him in the late 2000's. Tak has historical significance for Nickelodeon, being the former mascot of the company that did (and still does) produce licensed video games for Nickelodeon, and being a Nicktoon puts him in a weird sort of grey area between first and third party.
Rabbids - Rabbids Invasion was a surprisingly successful show, especially overseas, and lasted a full four seasons. Another character that qualifies for both this and Smash, Nick didn't air the fourth season, but the success of the show, along with a newfound fondness in some fans for the Rabbids thanks to Kingdom Battle, could lead to Nick approving of their inclusion. Especially at this point in the franchise's life where Nick would be willing to shell out a lot of investment money to license them from Ubisoft.
Dreamworks Animation - They got a lot of memes and consideration when this game was first announced, and have had Nicktoons made of three of their franchises, so a strong connection is there. However, Nickelodeon found it too costly to continue licensing their franchises after awhile, which is the reason for their move to Netflix. However, as this franchise gains prestige I can imagine Nick would be willing to shell out the cash at that point to license them and bring the Dreamworks crowd back in. The Penguins as a Tag Team mechanic, or Po, would definitely be the frontrunners. But I can still imagine a push for Shrek given his mematic status, his position as Dreamworks' mascot, and general popularity, despite not getting a Nicktoon himself.
Under this set of conditions, who do you think would be chosen as third party character in the hypothetical Brawl equivilant for the All Star Brawl franchise? :3
Aardman DOES have a connection to Nick through them working with Dreamworks on Chicken Run and Ubisoft on Rabbids Invasion, so it COULD happen! Honestly, I would LOVE to see them, too!As far as I can tell they have literally never aired on Nickelodeon (though they have occasionally aired on CN) but that will not stop me from giving respect to my cheesy boys
I'm not sure how they'd function together - clones of one another seems like the best choice (maybe Wallace is stronger, but since Gromit can run on 4 legs he's faster than the old man) - but I can imagine their playstyle pretty well. They'd be trapper archetype characters with projectiles galore, given that 1. inventions are their game; and 2. if you watch their movies you'll find they rarely show direct agression towards their villains unless in extremely dire circumstances
Looney Tunes - From 1988 to 99, Nick hosted a Looney Tunes block literally titled "Looney Tunes on Nickelodeon", and then in the early 2000s, the network reran Tiny Toon Adventures and Animaniacs.Still, I wouldn't let that hurt your opinion of the character (not that I'm accusing you of doing so). The incident is still very obscure overall.
Also, while being unable to fall asleep tonight I had an interesting thought. An entry or two down the line, the idea of Smash-esque Third Party characters comes to mind for a lot of people. But how would that be defined in this case? I had my own ideas for it along with a few examples of who we could get out of it.
The main criteria in this case would be Characters/franchises not owned by Nickelodeon, but aired on Nickelodeon at some point during their run, some of which are still associated with Nickelodeon. Especially since it's called Nickelodeon All Star Brawl (so one can't play the "It's not just [Inset first party here] all-stars anymore! It's MORE than that!" card often played in Smash speculation to justify characters with no connection to Nintendo), and Nickelodeon has no real reason to promote their competitors in their game (so no Steven Universe or Luz Owl House, no doubt who'd be popular requests under other sets of criteria). The show has to have a connection to Nickelodeon. So under these criteria, who do you think would be chosen?
Peanuts - Gonna start with a bit of an oddball here but hear me out! :3 Peanuts does have a collection to Nick through You're on Nickelodeon, Charlie Brown!, and umbrella program that aired most animated Peanuts specials on Nick until 2004. Furthermore, one might think a comic strip character like Charlie Brown or Snoopy would be out of place. But by the time this would be considered we'll more than likely have Garfield in the game, who is also a comic strip character. So the chosen Peanuts rep won't feel so out of place! The only issue here is that Peanuts typically isn't associated with Nickelodeon despite this connection.
Tak and the Power of Juju - Tak was THQ's mascot for awhile (and a rare example of a character who technically qualifies for both this and Smash) and Nick produced a TV show for him in the late 2000's. Tak has historical significance for Nickelodeon, being the former mascot of the company that did (and still does) produce licensed video games for Nickelodeon, and being a Nicktoon puts him in a weird sort of grey area between first and third party.
Rabbids - Rabbids Invasion was a surprisingly successful show, especially overseas, and lasted a full four seasons. Another character that qualifies for both this and Smash, Nick didn't air the fourth season, but the success of the show, along with a newfound fondness in some fans for the Rabbids thanks to Kingdom Battle, could lead to Nick approving of their inclusion. Especially at this point in the franchise's life where Nick would be willing to shell out a lot of investment money to license them from Ubisoft.
Dreamworks Animation - They got a lot of memes and consideration when this game was first announced, and have had Nicktoons made of three of their franchises, so a strong connection is there. However, Nickelodeon found it too costly to continue licensing their franchises after awhile, which is the reason for their move to Netflix. However, as this franchise gains prestige I can imagine Nick would be willing to shell out the cash at that point to license them and bring the Dreamworks crowd back in. The Penguins as a Tag Team mechanic, or Po, would definitely be the frontrunners. But I can still imagine a push for Shrek given his mematic status, his position as Dreamworks' mascot, and general popularity, despite not getting a Nicktoon himself.
Under this set of conditions, who do you think would be chosen as third party characters in the hypothetical Brawl equivilant for the All Star Brawl franchise? :3
Finn and Jake from Adventure Time, would not happen.Still, I wouldn't let that hurt your opinion of the character (not that I'm accusing you of doing so). The incident is still very obscure overall.
Also, while being unable to fall asleep tonight I had an interesting thought. An entry or two down the line, the idea of Smash-esque Third Party characters comes to mind for a lot of people. But how would that be defined in this case? I had my own ideas for it along with a few examples of who we could get out of it.
The main criteria in this case would be Characters/franchises not owned by Nickelodeon, but aired on Nickelodeon at some point during their run, some of which are still associated with Nickelodeon. Especially since it's called Nickelodeon All Star Brawl (so one can't play the "It's not just [Inset first party here] all-stars anymore! It's MORE than that!" card often played in Smash speculation to justify characters with no connection to Nintendo), and Nickelodeon has no real reason to promote their competitors in their game (so no Steven Universe or Luz Owl House, no doubt who'd be popular requests under other sets of criteria). The show has to have a connection to Nickelodeon. So under these criteria, who do you think would be chosen?
Peanuts - Gonna start with a bit of an oddball here but hear me out! :3 Peanuts does have a collection to Nick through You're on Nickelodeon, Charlie Brown!, and umbrella program that aired most animated Peanuts specials on Nick until 2004. Furthermore, one might think a comic strip character like Charlie Brown or Snoopy would be out of place. But by the time this would be considered we'll more than likely have Garfield in the game, who is also a comic strip character. So the chosen Peanuts rep won't feel so out of place! The only issue here is that Peanuts typically isn't associated with Nickelodeon despite this connection.
Tak and the Power of Juju - Tak was THQ's mascot for awhile (and a rare example of a character who technically qualifies for both this and Smash) and Nick produced a TV show for him in the late 2000's. Tak has historical significance for Nickelodeon, being the former mascot of the company that did (and still does) produce licensed video games for Nickelodeon, and being a Nicktoon puts him in a weird sort of grey area between first and third party.
Rabbids - Rabbids Invasion was a surprisingly successful show, especially overseas, and lasted a full four seasons. Another character that qualifies for both this and Smash, Nick didn't air the fourth season, but the success of the show, along with a newfound fondness in some fans for the Rabbids thanks to Kingdom Battle, could lead to Nick approving of their inclusion. Especially at this point in the franchise's life where Nick would be willing to shell out a lot of investment money to license them from Ubisoft.
Dreamworks Animation - They got a lot of memes and consideration when this game was first announced, and have had Nicktoons made of three of their franchises, so a strong connection is there. However, Nickelodeon found it too costly to continue licensing their franchises after awhile, which is the reason for their move to Netflix. However, as this franchise gains prestige I can imagine Nick would be willing to shell out the cash at that point to license them and bring the Dreamworks crowd back in. The Penguins as a Tag Team mechanic, or Po, would definitely be the frontrunners. But I can still imagine a push for Shrek given his mematic status, his position as Dreamworks' mascot, and general popularity, despite not getting a Nicktoon himself.
Under this set of conditions, who do you think would be chosen as third party characters in the hypothetical Brawl equivilant for the All Star Brawl franchise? :3
Did you read the criteria I set? I already covered that xDFinn and Jake from Adventure Time, would not happen.
Oh yeah.Did you read the criteria I set? I already covered that xD
I know, this was just meant to be a fun, hypotherical scenario.For simplicity (and sanity)'s sake, I think they'll strictly focus on any series that they've either created or acquired. Last thing we need are the Goku supporters coming in this thread.
I like the stages but we would not get live action content.
Yeah, honestly i would prefer if this game (and future sequels) stick to mostly Nikctoons only. Like i would rather have live action cahracters first, at least those are Nick-Exclusive.For simplicity (and sanity)'s sake, I think they'll strictly focus on any series that they've either created or acquired. Last thing we need are the Goku supporters coming in this thread.
they only said no live action characters, plus if Kart Racers 2 can have a Double Dare stage then I don't see why this game couldn'tI like the stages but we would not get live action content.
There's also the fact that outside of maybe, maybe, maybe the Turtles, almost no one is fit to be a clone. We get clones in Smash because a lot of video game characters re-use assets and models (with some characters like Luigi and Ken) and therefore some of them feel like easier clone material.I disagree, the game massively benefits from just having full movesets that represent the character's personality than a lazy clone when we could easily get MORE of their character and quirks to shine as a unique fighter. Especially in a game like this that's going all in on references while still having functional movesets? Anyone being a clone in this game would miss out big time.
The Spongebob with the green faceThere's also the fact that outside of maybe, maybe, maybe the Turtles, almost no one is fit to be a clone. We get clones in Smash because a lot of video game characters re-use assets and models (with some characters like Luigi and Ken) and therefore some of them feel like easier clone material.
2D cartoons like Spongebob never had this limiation, and as such, many of their characters almost NEVER look alike, which means making clones of them almost impossible, since they don't even have a similar model in the first place. Honestly the only non-TMNT cartoon characters that i can think of that could be clones in a fighting game are the Powerpuff Girls, and even then CN PTE didn't have them be clones.
Like, yeah, if you dig hard enough maybe you would find a character fit for the criteria, but the idea of clones is to pad out the roster by adding popular characters that look and fight similarily to an existing character to make development fast, like Richter from Simon, or Lucina from Marth.
What clone could Spongebob get that isn't already Spongebob himself? Bad Spongebob, Spongetron from that one episode he loses his brain, and Spongegar are all basically just Spongebob.
I like the implication that Harmonic Convergence is Garfield's home stage.
Alvin & The ChipmunksStill, I wouldn't let that hurt your opinion of the character (not that I'm accusing you of doing so). The incident is still very obscure overall.
Also, while being unable to fall asleep tonight I had an interesting thought. An entry or two down the line, the idea of Smash-esque Third Party characters comes to mind for a lot of people. But how would that be defined in this case? I had my own ideas for it along with a few examples of who we could get out of it.
The main criteria in this case would be Characters/franchises not owned by Nickelodeon, but aired on Nickelodeon at some point during their run, some of which are still associated with Nickelodeon. Especially since it's called Nickelodeon All Star Brawl (so one can't play the "It's not just [Inset first party here] all-stars anymore! It's MORE than that!" card often played in Smash speculation to justify characters with no connection to Nintendo), and Nickelodeon has no real reason to promote their competitors in their game (so no Steven Universe or Luz Owl House, no doubt who'd be popular requests under other sets of criteria). The show has to have a connection to Nickelodeon. So under these criteria, who do you think would be chosen?
Peanuts - Gonna start with a bit of an oddball here but hear me out! :3 Peanuts does have a collection to Nick through You're on Nickelodeon, Charlie Brown!, and umbrella program that aired most animated Peanuts specials on Nick until 2004. Furthermore, one might think a comic strip character like Charlie Brown or Snoopy would be out of place. But by the time this would be considered we'll more than likely have Garfield in the game, who is also a comic strip character. So the chosen Peanuts rep won't feel so out of place! The only issue here is that Peanuts typically isn't associated with Nickelodeon despite this connection.
Tak and the Power of Juju - Tak was THQ's mascot for awhile (and a rare example of a character who technically qualifies for both this and Smash) and Nick produced a TV show for him in the late 2000's. Tak has historical significance for Nickelodeon, being the former mascot of the company that did (and still does) produce licensed video games for Nickelodeon, and being a Nicktoon puts him in a weird sort of grey area between first and third party.
Rabbids - Rabbids Invasion was a surprisingly successful show, especially overseas, and lasted a full four seasons. Another character that qualifies for both this and Smash, Nick didn't air the fourth season, but the success of the show, along with a newfound fondness in some fans for the Rabbids thanks to Kingdom Battle, could lead to Nick approving of their inclusion. Especially at this point in the franchise's life where Nick would be willing to shell out a lot of investment money to license them from Ubisoft.
Dreamworks Animation - They got a lot of memes and consideration when this game was first announced, and have had Nicktoons made of three of their franchises, so a strong connection is there. However, Nickelodeon found it too costly to continue licensing their franchises after awhile, which is the reason for their move to Netflix. However, as this franchise gains prestige I can imagine Nick would be willing to shell out the cash at that point to license them and bring the Dreamworks crowd back in. The Penguins as a Tag Team mechanic, or Po, would definitely be the frontrunners. But I can still imagine a push for Shrek given his mematic status, his position as Dreamworks' mascot, and general popularity, despite not getting a Nicktoon himself.
Under this set of conditions, who do you think would be chosen as third party characters in the hypothetical Brawl equivilant for the All Star Brawl franchise? :3
If Nick Jr stuff are allowed, I would actually like Paw patrol. From what I saw it's probably one of the best kids show right now, and there's probably enough content to make a moveset with (they sometimes use gadget and other stuff).Still, I wouldn't let that hurt your opinion of the character (not that I'm accusing you of doing so). The incident is still very obscure overall.
Also, while being unable to fall asleep tonight I had an interesting thought. An entry or two down the line, the idea of Smash-esque Third Party characters comes to mind for a lot of people. But how would that be defined in this case? I had my own ideas for it along with a few examples of who we could get out of it.
The main criteria in this case would be Characters/franchises not owned by Nickelodeon, but aired on Nickelodeon at some point during their run, some of which are still associated with Nickelodeon. Especially since it's called Nickelodeon All Star Brawl (so one can't play the "It's not just [Inset first party here] all-stars anymore! It's MORE than that!" card often played in Smash speculation to justify characters with no connection to Nintendo), and Nickelodeon has no real reason to promote their competitors in their game (so no Steven Universe or Luz Owl House, no doubt who'd be popular requests under other sets of criteria). The show has to have a connection to Nickelodeon. So under these criteria, who do you think would be chosen?
Peanuts - Gonna start with a bit of an oddball here but hear me out! :3 Peanuts does have a collection to Nick through You're on Nickelodeon, Charlie Brown!, and umbrella program that aired most animated Peanuts specials on Nick until 2004. Furthermore, one might think a comic strip character like Charlie Brown or Snoopy would be out of place. But by the time this would be considered we'll more than likely have Garfield in the game, who is also a comic strip character. So the chosen Peanuts rep won't feel so out of place! The only issue here is that Peanuts typically isn't associated with Nickelodeon despite this connection.
Tak and the Power of Juju - Tak was THQ's mascot for awhile (and a rare example of a character who technically qualifies for both this and Smash) and Nick produced a TV show for him in the late 2000's. Tak has historical significance for Nickelodeon, being the former mascot of the company that did (and still does) produce licensed video games for Nickelodeon, and being a Nicktoon puts him in a weird sort of grey area between first and third party.
Rabbids - Rabbids Invasion was a surprisingly successful show, especially overseas, and lasted a full four seasons. Another character that qualifies for both this and Smash, Nick didn't air the fourth season, but the success of the show, along with a newfound fondness in some fans for the Rabbids thanks to Kingdom Battle, could lead to Nick approving of their inclusion. Especially at this point in the franchise's life where Nick would be willing to shell out a lot of investment money to license them from Ubisoft.
Dreamworks Animation - They got a lot of memes and consideration when this game was first announced, and have had Nicktoons made of three of their franchises, so a strong connection is there. However, Nickelodeon found it too costly to continue licensing their franchises after awhile, which is the reason for their move to Netflix. However, as this franchise gains prestige I can imagine Nick would be willing to shell out the cash at that point to license them and bring the Dreamworks crowd back in. The Penguins as a Tag Team mechanic, or Po, would definitely be the frontrunners. But I can still imagine a push for Shrek given his mematic status, his position as Dreamworks' mascot, and general popularity, despite not getting a Nicktoon himself.
Under this set of conditions, who do you think would be chosen as third party characters in the hypothetical Brawl equivilant for the All Star Brawl franchise? :3
I personally really don't buy the idea of a composite Wild Thornberrys/Rugrats stage. By the same logic you could have them share a stage with Aaahh!!! Real Monsters, which also wouldn't make much sense.
Especially considering that The Wild Thornberrys is not a spinoff of Rugrats and is instead its own IP made by the same creators that crossed over with it once. This decision would degrade the Wild Thornberrys from its own IP to a Rugrats spinoff.Forcing the Rugrats and Thornberries to share a stage would be a crime and extremely stupid.
This is not PSASBR and so far all stages have specifically represented one IP.Isn't sharing stages what PSABR did?
Not really, PSABR stages had a main universe, and a second universe that invade the stages (for exemple the Hydra from God of war invade the Metropolis from Ratchet & Clank). But some people think the Rugrats stages will be a Rugrats go wild stage, which is a crossover between Rugrats and Wild thornberry.Isn't sharing stages what PSABR did?
Didnt know about this. This is really cool.Remember the one time Cartoon Network invaded Nickelodeon? I guess CN is considered fair game now.
In all seriousness, That's pretty insane to think that actually happened and it wasn't just some random commercial pulled from Warner Bros/Cartoon Network's own channel, It was literally created with the intention of taking a jab at their biggest competition in Nickelodeon and on their own home turf no less.
Obviously, I doubt it will ever happen, But I think most would absolutely pay to see these 2 major childhood network powerhouses go at it in a crossover fighting game someday, I know for damn sure I would.
Interesting choice for Ren and Stimpy. Personally, I always draw a blank when thinking of iconic stages for the series.
Reminds me of the time when the Rabbids were included in a TMNT fighting game for essentially no reason.Not really, PSABR stages had a main universe, and a second universe that invade the stages (for exemple the Hydra from God of war invade the Metropolis from Ratchet & Clank). But some people think the Rugrats stages will be a Rugrats go wild stage, which is a crossover between Rugrats and Wild thornberry.
Basically imagine if Rabbids was in Smash and their home stages is the ancient garden from Mario + Rabbids. Sure it could make a grat stage, but that's not really the best Rabbids representation, in the same way that the Rugrats + Thornberry crossover isn't the best Rugrats representation.
Considering they had to change the name of the Chokey Chicken for the movie due to it being lewd slang, somehow I doubt that'd be the stage for Rocko.View attachment 328363
I updated my stages prediction. Roster prediction remains the same
It was the final season of the TV show that had Chewy Chicken. The movie went back to Chokey, probably because Rocko's audience is now 20 years older.Considering they had to change the name of the Chokey Chicken for the movie due to it being lewd slang
I'm listeningHas anyone heard of the voice audio discovery on the steam page? this was discovered by Slackerz.
He's talking about thisI'm listening
I remember hearing about this. Personally doubt that it means we're getting character voices. The more likely case is we're getting an announcer for the game. Maybe it's the guy from the Future Games Con trailerHe's talking about this
- YouTube
Enjoy the videos and music that you love, upload original content and share it all with friends, family and the world on YouTube.www.youtube.com
If it's not Marc Summers, Kirk Fogg, Summer Sanders, or Stick Stickly, is it even worth it?I remember hearing about this. Personally doubt that it means we're getting character voices. The more likely case is we're getting an announcer for the game. Maybe it's the guy from the Future Games Con trailer
The FD equivalent has already been confirmed to be the Harmonic Convergence from the Legend of Korra, and I don't think that Garfield is likely anyways.View attachment 328396
Garfield's table would make a good Final Destination. Also, Garfield's F-Tilt should be Ganondorf's, and Squidward's Kazuya's.
Forgive the ignorance but who are those people?If it's not Marc Summers, Kirk Fogg, Summer Sanders, or Stick Stickly, is it even worth it?