How the hell is Hugh comparable to Jar Jar? Jar Jar is an absurd comedic character in a cool action movie, Boba is a cool action character in a cool action movie, Hugh is a absurd comedic character in an absurdist comedy.
That's an inherently bad thing because...???? Like, I can understand if this was Smash where the whole identity is "making dreams come true", but that identity is something NASB needs to avoid like the plague (not inherently granting fan requests mind you, that's fine, just that becoming its identity is dangerous). Ultimately, one's own opinion is all that should really matter, not that of the majority.
Again, how is wanting a character for the meme less valid than wanting them because they're cool or cute or scary?
Also, the only people I've ever seen criticise NASB for lacking protags alone, and not any specific choices like Hugh, are you and the Honest Trailers guy.
Firstly, not really relevant to the conversation, but I genuinely don't understand why people like Boba Fett when he is a slave trader, which is an objectively evil thing. The comparison to Jar Jar is that he's a comedic character and has roughly the same relevance to Hughs relationship in Jimmy Neutron, because he has more of a role than Boba does in the movie. I'm saying you were downplaying Hughs role a bit.
Second, you're free to want whoever you want but you literally cannot argue that if you want to sell something you need to market it, and for platform fighters dealing in pre-existing IP that means characters people recognize. As funny as Hugh is, when people mention Jimmy Neutron, they're more likely to recognize Jimmy, Carl, Sheen, and Cindy than Hugh. That's just an objective fact because they are the main characters. Weird picks aren't an inherently bad thing, but they should be sprinkled in as a rare thing while focusing on pleasing the largest demographic possible, which leads to sales, which leads to a more active community, and happy executives who are more likely to greenlight more content and sequels. I don't think you grasp how lucky we are to be even getting a sequel.
And though it should be obvious, pissing off your core demographic is always a bad idea. Making people confused and angry is never a good thing when you're trying to sell something, despite what trolls online will tell you.
And look, I get that you want the game you like to stay niche, but that is a self sabotaging move in a market that's so competitive. Like I said we are stupid lucky to be even getting a sequel, so avoiding the pitfall the first game did (trying to appeal to a small niche audience) is an important step in the right direction for getting more content, future sequels, and for getting those hardworking devs more work. You feel me?
Third, and I hesitate to bring this up as I don't like being associated with the website because it's awful, but clearly you didn't read posts about the game on reddit. Lots of people complain about the roster there. Same can be said in YouTube comments and other gaming websites. There's more people interested in the game than just people on this website. Hell, I know several people who actively chose to not buy the game because the roster didn't have enough of their favorite characters on it and have said that it seems "too focused on being weird and unexpected" than actually being a "Nickelodeon All-Star" game. No matter what the devs say about not taking the name seriously, the fact is it's called what it is and that name carries expectations of what is going to be in it.
I find this odd to say when this game already has Spongebob Squarepants, Nigel Thornberry and Powdered Toast Man in it.
Having characters that you'd never expect to be in a fighting game is the whole appeal of this game.
In regards to Nigel, point taken, but there's plenty of material for both of the others that can make them work in a fighting game.