morph?If NASB must have an Ice Climbers character, give me Nick and Jr.
View attachment 374794
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
morph?If NASB must have an Ice Climbers character, give me Nick and Jr.
View attachment 374794
There is only one instance where I’ve seen a trio character (that isn’t tagging in/out between the three) work, and that’s, weirdly enough, Super Brawl 3 Rabbids. But that’s because stacked on top of each other not only feels mildly in character but also looks appropriateMVS is pretty good about not cramming pairs of characters together unless absolutely necessary. It's more fun to play co-op as Finn and Jake, which is something me and a friend did often, than it would be to play as both at once while my friend plays as Batman or something.
My question to these people though is, how the hell would a trio of Eds even work? Would they all be huddled together like the Ant Hill Mob or stacked into a tower or something? That would look stupid. How would they attack if all three of them are glued together? They would have to give them a bunch of generic "swing each other around" moves or the most basic EEnE references possible that could apply to all three.
Same thing with Mordecai and Rigby, the PPG, Gumball and Darwin, why do they want the whole game to be duos?
Only one I can kind of get is the Warner siblings as a Pokemon trainer kind of deal, since I guess there wouldn't be much to differentiate all three of them from Bugs on their own, but even then, that's still just putting them together because there's more than one of them.
I think actually fitting candidates for duo/teams would be like, Cosmo and Wanda (with or without Timmy) or Sanjay and Craig.
It depends on whether or not that franchise needs more stages. I'd argue the remaining protagonists are enough.Do you think we'll be getting extra TMNT stages for Raph and Donnie? I personally hope so, since Sewer Slam and Rooftop Rumble have awesome music.
That’s not a rule? And it absolutely does. What the stages would be idk but it can totally have moreIt depends on whether or not that franchise needs more stages. I'd argue the remaining protagonists are enough.
Depends on if they bring the stages from 1 back or not. Even if they do, I could see at least one new TMNT stage for the sake of having something new to represent the show besides characters.Do you think we'll be getting extra TMNT stages for Raph and Donnie? I personally hope so, since Sewer Slam and Rooftop Rumble have awesome music.
Been a while since I last saw that film back in 2016.Monster Trucks: Creech (The titular monster truck.)
I mean, if live action characters were off the table for NASB as a whole, this is one of the few ways we can get a live-action property besides a Henry Danger rep that looks like the 2018 cartoon spinoff, or Ed from Good Burger.Been a while since I last saw that film back in 2016.
He could make for a fun fighter, using his tentacles to hit with as well the truck to ram and drive around.
(Having his head pop out from the hood to bite and chomp)
The WHAT!?the concept art version of monster trucks monster
Ohohohoh, please let it be Nick All-Star 2Hmm
Paramount \ Nick do have a big presence at comic con
Tbh I'm pretty sure every stages of the first game will come back. I don't see the point of cutting any of them since they cover pretty much the basis of Nickelodeon, just like the characters. The only stages that I could maybe see not coming back is Showdown at teeter totter gulch being changed for another Rugrats stages.Depends on if they bring the stages from 1 back or not. Even if they do, I could see at least one new TMNT stage for the sake of having something new to represent the show besides characters.
Due to the home stage thing I'm not expecting a stage to be cut unless they also remove the corresponding character.Tbh I'm pretty sure every stages of the first game will come back. I don't see the point of cutting any of them since they cover pretty much the basis of Nickelodeon, just like the characters. The only stages that I could maybe see not coming back is Showdown at teeter totter gulch being changed for another Rugrats stages.
The San Diego Comic Con lasts from July 20th, to July 23rd. Nick has a whole bunch of panels sprinkled throughout the days. I did find a whole bunch of merch that will be sold there:Ohohohoh, please let it be Nick All-Star 2
When is this?
Merch wise, easy repaint/chase variant,I just don't see a sequel being announced at San Diego Comic Con, it's too big a venue lmao
Also... What's with all the random Purple Reptar love lately?
I just don't see a sequel being announced at San Diego Comic Con, it's too big a venue lmao
Also... What's with all the random Purple Reptar love lately?
excitement levels: loweredThe San Diego Comic Con lasts from June 20th, to June 23rd. Nick has a whole bunch of panels sprinkled throughout the days. I did find a whole bunch of merch that will be sold there:
View attachment 374881
View attachment 374882
View attachment 374883 View attachment 374884 View attachment 374885 View attachment 374886
Yes and no.Is purple Reptar an actual character in Rugrats?
Cause it would be funny if he (or she) ends up being a character
Imagine if Rugrats gets another character after all the arguing over the logistics of having a baby in a fighting game and it's just Purple Reptar.
Yes, even though he's already a costume. Deal with it.
Well I really doubt resources not spent on solo Norbert would go to a character from an unrepped show since it looks like there isn't just one single Nicktoons license you pay for and get every character you want. I'd explain what makes me think that again but I have an appointment right now.I feel that a lot of the "cram into a duo/trio fighter" mentality comes from the fact that these games typically have limited slots (especially in DLC, imagine how much backlash there'd be if two of the last game's three slots were Angry Beavers) and budgets, and there are plenty of duos/trios where it feels weird to not have the whole set, so a lot of people want to have the whole set represented while not having to give 2-3 extra character slots to a given IP just to fulfill that. Not saying that it's good or anything, just putting in a theory as to why people think the way they do. I can get how to put Zim and Gir together, along with Ren and Stimpy, but I can't see any way to put the beavers into one character without it looking awkward.
“content from both games” when Street Outlaws 1 only had a single video on the channel and in the playlist. I don’t think this is a factorThe NASB playlist itself hasn't been updated. I should note that the Street Outlaws playlist has content from both games.
So apparently 2 more private videos were added and then subsequently deleted shortly afterwards. So that makes a total of 4 private videos at some point, but now back to 2. According to users in the Discord, it was the most recent 2 that were removedWell it may finally be time to get off the hopium, GameMill’s Trailers playlist just added two private videos, something that pretty much always happened before NASB reveals
View attachment 374899
View attachment 374900
I highly doubt it won't release this year. We had a Nickelodeon crossover games every year in October for 3 years now.What assurance do we have that this is being announced anytime soon or even this year at all?
Although this year we have two regular Nick games. We've got SpongeBob Cosmic Shake earlier this year and now we have Avatar: Quest for Balance coming out this holiday season.I highly doubt it won't release this year. We had a Nickelodeon crossover games every year in October for 3 years now.