D
Deleted member
Guest
Eh, I rather get this over with and post the whole thing.
Starting from the beginning of the game (#108). This is a huge post here and some may have already been resolved or moot.
#125
#126
#131
#134
#135
I'd appreciate a better response then a blind man throwing darts.
#153
#156
#161
1. You said that we had a 50% of us getting a Dragonball (Unless someone apprently has a 100% of getting one, as Xonar claimed his character to do). In that case, we may only get six Dragonballs. Now getting seven is possible with a 13-person search, but we don't know if the 13th person is going to get that final Dragonball.
2. Lets not immediately lynch the person who isn't willing to give out Dragonballs. Now yes, we should add them to the lynch query (Whatever that spells), but we should only lynch them as not giving Dragonballs the main reason if they continuously refuse to do so. We could lose a lot of townies that way.
#162
#168
You're suggesting something that is explicity against the rules. Sure one time we'll get a warning but if we continue it, we could get replaced/mod-killed. I'm telling you, it's not going to work.
Even if this wasn't against the rules, this idea is dangerous. Scums know who to pick off and instead of having to actively search for people with Dragonballs, they can quckhammer/night kill to earn Dragonballs, making scums works easy.
I also didn't like the fact you agreed to Cello Marl's idea. I already explained why I didn't like it.
#175
#199
I really did not this post at all. Why did you give your opinion on Cello's idea if you didn't like what Nicholas1024 was doing (Also a sign of hypocrisy)? This is another OMGUS reply to Nicholas1024 since your reasoning is, once again, terrible.
On top of that, you didn't even bother to explain why Xonar deserved a FoS, which is also scummy.
#201
#202
Completely and utterly misinterperated what Nicholas1024 was trying to do. Nicholas1024's idea is most surely more useful then your example.
#203
You are incorrect on that regard. Now you could say that I'm wrong because The Paprika Killer was the 2nd to vote for Cello Marl and Nicholas1024, but you only voted Cello Marl because you didn't like his idea, not because he was scummy. You also originally failed to explain why Nicholas1024 deserve your vote. When you did explain, you said you voted for him because you wanted him to explain himself. Were there any scum tells present in Nicholas1024 that originally warrant your vote?
#205
#209
#210
#220
#227
#232
#241
#247
#249
Voting someone off due to inactivity is not a good reason alone. If they're inactive and don't want to play, then they can just get a replacement. You're going to need something else to back that up.
And it really feels like you were voting for the sake of bandwagonning.
#263
#265
Also, in that case, bringing in extra players isn't selfish as well, because for all we know, they could be a townie. Yes, bringing in another player can be beneficial to town if we're lucky. Sure we won't know the alignment and they could be scum, but they could be townies as well. Plus, this adds more variety to the game. On top of that, wouldn't you want more experience players in here that'll make the game more fun?
#266
#268
I'm not sure how this is suppose to work. Can you please explain the purpose of this post or rather, the editing of #265?
#271
I really don't think that was really a proper response.
#272
#283
#285
#305
#308
#312
#314
#350
I'd appreciate a real response to him.
#356
#359
#364
#438
#463
I know other people have said this, but you bombed this post miserably. Worst post ever in this game.
#464
Completely useless post that gives us nothing to work on.
#481
#484
#598, #599, #601
I'd apperciate that you would have given me a real response. And specifically at Overswarm's #601, that comment is irrelavent to the game.
#632
I lead a nearly succesful lynch campaign against Xonar (Junglefever's vote was random), I mentioned my four suspects in details throughout the game, I have been active, and proved that all wishes comes with risks.
Optionally, do you have other reasons for wanting me gone aside from fluffs?
#635
#637
@Junglefever: Add this into your big post you're promising. What is your opinion on Xonar? Explain it in detail. It's also recommend you re-read, as you have a few things to answer.
Some thoughts on the situation:
Overswarm is no longer one of my strongest town reads. I really hate his activity policy that he was trying to enforce, trying to force a end to RVS, giving out a terrible example, not explaining things, contradicting, misinterperating things, and a bit of skimming. I now have a slightly scummy read on him. He has made some great posts, thought, so that's why he isn't one of my top suspects, but if it comes to the time where Overswarm is about to get lynched and there's no way to get him out of it, I will gladly lynch him if necessary.
Junglefever is also skimming a bit since he has not answer one of my question yet (Will dig for it if you ask). A bit more scummier now. However, it is nice that he took the time to post. However, I want to see his more content-filled post he promised yesterday by today or my suspicion will continue to rise.
I want to hear more on Meta-Kirby on the situation. Meta-Kirby is going to get prodded soon. His last post was on May 6, 2010 at 1:42 PM. The rules said that you must post once every seventy-two hours and Meat-Kirby just broked that rule today. There is no excuse for this, especially since he's been checking the Desicive Games section numerous times during the course of that last post and now. I also noticed that he was tunneling me a bit. Since his analysis on the four people he thought were scums (Me, Xonar, Overswarm, and Cello Marl), he has dedicated most of his posts toward me. On top of that, he has not mentioned his case on Overswarm at all. I'm starting to become suspicous of him. However, I'm not really comfortable with lynching him yet, since he did improve his contribuation until his sudden disapperance from this thread.
Cello Marl is also looking ****** as well. I really didn't like a lot of points he made. I already made it obvious he was my 2nd lynch candidate after Xonar and this only emphaize it.
I am still getting a pretty scummy vibe from The Paprika Killer, but it's nice he's finally taking a stance with a vote on me.
Xonar is improving a little, but his past actions so overwhemingly surpass the goods he made, that he still remains my top lynch candidate. Whenever or not he'll improve enough to get him off my top suspect list will be something to watch. As I started a nearly successful lynch campaign against him, I'm not planning on unvoting him until I'm absolutely convince he's not my top suspect anymore OR if changing vote is necessary to get a lynch.
Want to hear more out of Mentosman8, especially since he's been active in Tree Stump Mafia, which could be ending soon. Will be interesting to see what he has to say on the matter going on now and where his next vote will go to. He needs to do it soon, thought, as it has been over fourty-eight hours as he posted. Once it hits May 10, 2010 at 2:19 PM, he will be under prod zone.
Kataefi and Meta-Kirby, please vote someone. Not voting is anti-town and it will not benefit us in the long run.
I'm actually really surprise that I'm suspecting over 1/3 of people here (Including Meta-Kirby, Overswarm, Cello Marl, Junglefever, The Paprika Killer, and of course, Xonar, but not Mentosman8). However, for convience sake, I'll list my top five suspects in order from least scummiest to most scummiest:
5): Overswarm
4): Junglefever
3): The Paprika Killer
2): Cello Marl
1): Xonar
I'd also like to remind you guys that deadline is approaching soon, so we need a lynch candidate. If you do not have a vote on someone (Meta-Kirby, Kataefi), vote now. A No Lynch is unaffordable in Mafia, especially in Day 1.
Wow, that's a mouthful to say. However, I was forced to cut corners a bit since Wordpad was being an ******* to me and messed a few of my quotes up. The links are still there, thought.
Starting from the beginning of the game (#108). This is a huge post here and some may have already been resolved or moot.
#125
Elaborate on why you're interested in a Mirai Trunks name-claim. We don't know if he's even one of the characters.Cello Marl said:I'm interested in a Mirai Trunks name-claim.
#126
I really don't see much benefits of doing a mass Dragonball/training. I have a very bad feeling about the former idea because I think it could really hurt town not just on the long run, but immediately as well.Cello Marl said:Also, was anyone interested in a mass Dragon Ball search? Or a mass power up? I think it's probably best to go all-in one way or the other.
#131
And you thought discussion about how to do training and searching for Dragonballs is that important. No it isn't, the most important part of the game is to hunt for scums. How does that relate with finding scums?Overswarm said:Joke phase is over, people.
#134
That's talking about the original Dragonball series. Bulma still plays a important role in Dragonball Z, but she is reduced to a secondary character in the anime, just like Chi-Chi, Master Roshi, Tien, Yamcha, etc.Meta-Kirby said:SSBF, I'd have to disagree with Bulma being a Vanilla Townie role. In the series, she was the first person to actually go search for the DragonBalls AND had a radar, so....well, I don't know what role that would fill, but I don't think she'd be a townie.
#135
I'd appreciate a better response then a blind man throwing darts.
#153
Actually, normal converstations also lead to a dead end. Like when we reach the end of a Day and when the game finish.mentosman8 said:and simply makes those talking about it look like they're trying to contribute when the discussion leads to a dead end anyway.
#156
Okay, I really, really despise the idea. What if you're townie, have all seven Dragonballs, and Mafia kills you? They get all seven Dragonballs and they get to wish. If you somehow managed to get all seven Dragonballs and everyone trusts you, wish as soon as possible so scums don't kill you before they get the chance.Cello Marl said:If people are worried about getting killed for saying that they have a ball, then I'll hold onto them.
#161
Two problem with this:Cello Marl said:Assuming that a 12 or 13-person search will gather all the balls (which is still in my opinion the most likely scenario), we can either get a N2 wish or significantly reduce the lynch pool by scrutinizing anyone who doesn't hand over a ball.
1. You said that we had a 50% of us getting a Dragonball (Unless someone apprently has a 100% of getting one, as Xonar claimed his character to do). In that case, we may only get six Dragonballs. Now getting seven is possible with a 13-person search, but we don't know if the 13th person is going to get that final Dragonball.
2. Lets not immediately lynch the person who isn't willing to give out Dragonballs. Now yes, we should add them to the lynch query (Whatever that spells), but we should only lynch them as not giving Dragonballs the main reason if they continuously refuse to do so. We could lose a lot of townies that way.
#162
Now yes, Cello Marl is currently my 2nd lynch candidate (Next to Xonar, thought that might change if he further improves himself and if Cello Marl is going to hit the chopping blocks), but back then, I purely disagreed with his idea. However, that view of him has changed a lot since then and I wouldn't mind a Cello Marl lynch.SwordsRbroken said:But anyway, SSBF, a few pages ago, you supported Overswarm, saying that his post was townie. Makes it sound to me that you agreed with him, but now sold 2 has called him out on it, you are now saying that cello hasn't committed a scum tell.
#168
You're suggesting something that is explicity against the rules. Sure one time we'll get a warning but if we continue it, we could get replaced/mod-killed. I'm telling you, it's not going to work.
Even if this wasn't against the rules, this idea is dangerous. Scums know who to pick off and instead of having to actively search for people with Dragonballs, they can quckhammer/night kill to earn Dragonballs, making scums works easy.
I also didn't like the fact you agreed to Cello Marl's idea. I already explained why I didn't like it.
#175
#192Nicholas1024 said:Super smash bros. fan: I hate the idea. It will not benefit us in the long run. It's dangerous and it may not work. Let's say that Cello Marl is town. He gets all seven Dragonballs. Then suddenly, scum quicklynch/kill him and they get all seven Dragonballs. I don't think we can trust Cello with this idea, at least for now.
Severe contradiction. You clearly had a vote on him, said Cello's idea was horrible, and found him very scummy because of it.The Paprika Killer said:nich I NEVER said cello to be scum
Nice OMGUS there. Your reasoning sucks and you made it so obvious that it was.The Paprika Killer said:a nice FoS on you. first you say "copy/paste and fill in" now you're like "I'll write your opinion on the matter for you."
#199
I really did not this post at all. Why did you give your opinion on Cello's idea if you didn't like what Nicholas1024 was doing (Also a sign of hypocrisy)? This is another OMGUS reply to Nicholas1024 since your reasoning is, once again, terrible.
On top of that, you didn't even bother to explain why Xonar deserved a FoS, which is also scummy.
#201
But it's not like The Paprika Killer had to agree on Nicholas1024. On top of that, The Paprika Killer did not buddy Cello Marl at all.Xonar said:Wow TPK, I don't like your vibes at all.
Vote: TPK
He has a theory, let him do what he wants to do. You're also mass buddying Cello, me not like.
#202
Completely and utterly misinterperated what Nicholas1024 was trying to do. Nicholas1024's idea is most surely more useful then your example.
#203
You are incorrect on that regard. Now you could say that I'm wrong because The Paprika Killer was the 2nd to vote for Cello Marl and Nicholas1024, but you only voted Cello Marl because you didn't like his idea, not because he was scummy. You also originally failed to explain why Nicholas1024 deserve your vote. When you did explain, you said you voted for him because you wanted him to explain himself. Were there any scum tells present in Nicholas1024 that originally warrant your vote?
#205
And why did Nicholas1024 deserve it? Nice job failing to explain why.Overswarm said:You have just joined my list of "people I don't want in lylo"
#209
Skimming much? As Rockin explained, Gheb is serving as a replacement.Hilt said:Vote: Gheb
#210
You did the exact thing to Nicholas1024 in #202. Obvious contradiction is obvious.Overswarm said:I'll say things when I need to and keep them to myself when I shouldn't, but I'm not going to have Nicholas put things into my (or anyone else's) mouth.
#220
Notice that this is a obvious contradiction here. He said that he doesn't like one-liners posts, encourage decent size posts, and then discourage really big posts. Sold2, you're going to have to get used to big posts here as we're discussion a variety of topics here, so big posts like this one is necessary.Sold2 said:If so, howabout I make a bunch of 1 liner posts like other players do, instead of a decent sized post? Also OS, if you're going to disassemble Cello's plan piece by piece, that's cool and all but try to keep it moderately sized... big posts are not good for town, imo. They cause disinterest and confusion, letting scum slip by easier while losing town. Use key arguments, not a pile of them.
#227
Not at all. Overswarm's post are extremely large. The Paprika Killer's posts is a lot smaller. Care to englighten me on how they are similar?Nicholas1024 said:Anyone else notice that up until recently, Paprika Killer and Overswarm's play were eerily similar?
#232
It can also mean a person has no read/null read on them.The Paprika Killer said:not scummy generally means leaning town.
#241
You are wrong in this regard. We've seen over 100 posts related to the game by now, so it's easy to take a stance on someone now.Xonar said:People can hardly make a hard stance this early based on 1 action.
#247
Mentosman8 and Hilt have provided a decent amount of contents in the game, especially Mentosman8, whom post have been nearly perfect in execution. Only Meta-Kirby (Out of the three here) hasn't really contributed much in the game and I disagree with him being one of the best players. Why not Junglefever? I heard he was a very good player but he has barely contributed anything of substance, only a promise of a more content-filled post.Overswarm said:I'm disappointed in that the best players in this game aren't posting. Mentos, Hilt, Meta-Kirby, get the ball rolling on something.
#249
Voting someone off due to inactivity is not a good reason alone. If they're inactive and don't want to play, then they can just get a replacement. You're going to need something else to back that up.
And it really feels like you were voting for the sake of bandwagonning.
#263
Actually, I've only heard that directed toward me in Newbie Mafia 6 before.Clownbot said:SSBF, I could have sworn that in, like, every game I've played with you it's been said not to post a "town-to-scum" list including everyone.
#265
Here's the problem with reviving townies. What if a dead townie gets revived as a scum? We will most likely won't know what alignment they'll be part of, so we can't ignore them. If they're scum, it's townies helping scums, which is a terrible idea. Even if they get confirmed scum, unless a doctor is around, scum can just re-kill the townie, basically wasting our effort. Even if a Doctor is around, they have to survive each and every Day, Twlight, and Night to protect the confirmed townie. There are risks involved every wish and you need to realize that.Cello Marl said:The reason for this is that there is only one viable wish: Revive a townie. Night immunity, bringing in another player, other conceivable extra powers; all of these are innately selfish and cannot be corroborated as beneficial for town, and the very action of making such a wish casts doubt on the wisher.
Also, in that case, bringing in extra players isn't selfish as well, because for all we know, they could be a townie. Yes, bringing in another player can be beneficial to town if we're lucky. Sure we won't know the alignment and they could be scum, but they could be townies as well. Plus, this adds more variety to the game. On top of that, wouldn't you want more experience players in here that'll make the game more fun?
Sorry about that, but I really don't believe your claim. Why claim so early? You could have used the oppertunity to save yourself in the future and people would be more likely to believe you. On top of that, we don't know what alignment a Bulletproof member could be part of. Overall, your claim is terrible. You made the right claim (If you're a townie, that is), but at the wrong time.Cello Marl said:If we somehow do not find all the Balls, we will at least have them be secure as I can hold onto them overnight, as Hilt surmised, for I am Bulletproof (more or less). This alleviates any potential disaster in having scum Night Kill some random person that had a Dragon Ball. If you all prefer, during the Day, someone else can hold onto them, and I'll just hold onto them at Night.
#266
Can you please explain this to me? I really don't know what you're saying here.Cello Marl said:Enforcing strict martial law destroys any hypothetical "scum safe zone". Don't go against it. Just don't do it. Ask Swords, Rockin, and SSBF what will happen.
You have a point about Nicholas1024 and Overswarm, but Xonar commited so many scummy actions that it's sad. He nearly got replaced/mod-killed for his actions. Mentosman8 has been one of town's most pro-town players in the game. Why do you think Mentosman8 is scummy?Cello Marl said:Xonar and Nick are Good People, and Overswarm and Mentos need to die.
#268
I'm not sure how this is suppose to work. Can you please explain the purpose of this post or rather, the editing of #265?
#271
I really don't think that was really a proper response.
#272
Hilt has actually contributed a decent amount of contents in the game, so I wouldn't count Hilt as a lurker.Overswarm said:lurkers that post only when its safe/beneficial (Helloooooooo Hilt)
I am really tired of your activity policy that you've tried to force upon us. Examine people's behavior, they way they post, and contents they provide, not solely by their activiness here. The only person that is an exception to this rule is Junglefever.Overswarm said:Everyone posts.
#283
Could you have been at least patience? If it worked, you could have received the results you wanted.Hilt said:Why aren't more people voting for cello c'mon bandwagon go!
#285
I know this is a joke, but what was the purpose of suggesting a quick lynch when we know it won't benefit town and you weren't meaning it?Hilt said:lol because i definitely want a quick lynch. That's obviously what i meant. XD
#305
The problem is that Overswarm is right, Cello is just claiming here. We have no idea if the person is truly scummy or not. We can only find out by flip or confirmation.Nicholas1024 said:I have a town read on Cello at this point, I will trust him with the dragonballs. And I know the wish is deliberately huge, but it's not instant-win huge. At this point Cello is #2 on my townie list (behind myself, of course.), so I'm willing to trust him. I'd be surprised if he was scum, but I feel that the potential benefits of giving him the dragonballs outweigh the potential risks.
#308
What if both of you are scums? Then both of you have direct relationship with each other because both of you could be scums.Overswarm said:What does me being town have to do with anything? Me being town or mafia has no direct relation to Cello being town or mafia
#312
Yes it is because it falls under the "Lynch All Lairs" policy. If you lie about your claim, chances are you're going to get lynched for it.Xonar said:Besides, I don't think that falseclaiming bulletproof/hated/lovers is scummy.
#314
No offense, but we don't have time for sarcasm on Mafia games (With the exception of Random Voting Stage). We have to be serious with each and every post during the game, no exception.Hilt said:I mean... I know sarcasm can be hard to see on the internet, but really? C'mon. I said bandwagon (which can be used for pressure, information, getting close to lynch, etc) and OS assumed I wanted to quick lynch Cello (which is laughable) just because I said "more votes". You're skimming.
#350
I'd appreciate a real response to him.
#356
Don't try to plan so early now. Opinions on people do change and you're no exception. Look how well that's working in Tree Stump Mafia.Cello Marl said:Xonar, we'll get Mentos toMorrow, and Hilt the Day after. Let's go OS now.
#359
No offense, but this sounds like you're doing this for the sake of bandwaggoning or agreeing with Cello Marl.Xonar said:Unvote, vote: OS
#364
First off, this is somewhat hypocritical. Earlier, you went after The Paprika Killer for mass buddying Cello Marl when he wasn't. Now I'm feeling like you're buddying Cello himself. Secondly, people have opinions, they don't have to vote for Overswarm/Hilt/Mentosman8 for lynch. Third, all except maybe Overswarm are terribly lynch candidates for Day 1 and even then, I still disagree to a Day 1 Overswarm Lynch. All have been very productive in the game, helpful, and contributed a lot of substance in the game. Fourth, you are blantantly parroting Cello Marl on this.Xonar said:Everyone not voting or not voting overswarm/hilt/mentos needs to rethink
#438
Here's the problem. You gave us absolutely nothing to work on with Overswarm. You have yet to explain why you're suspicious of him.Meta-Kirby said:I didn't go through the whole list and I CLEARLY delineated just a few suspects. I really don't think that list at the end is that big of a deal. The people you'll wanna look at from my post are the four I highlighted (Cello, OS, SSBF, Xonar).
#463
I know other people have said this, but you bombed this post miserably. Worst post ever in this game.
#464
Completely useless post that gives us nothing to work on.
#481
You could have done a re-read of the thread and made a post about it. That is another way to get a discussion going.Xonar said:Yeah it's true, I haven't been all that helpful, I admit. But honestly, I feel like there isn't much to say right now beside my lynch targets.
#484
Re-reading wouldn't require much, only dedication and the ability to read. Please don't be lazy.Xonar said:Nich, as your plan has failed, could you tell us what it originally was?
#598, #599, #601
I'd apperciate that you would have given me a real response. And specifically at Overswarm's #601, that comment is irrelavent to the game.
#632
Show me evidence that at least 90% of my posts have been filled with fluff. "Practically" means it's very close to being there. Which means your homework assignment is to show me evidence that 90% of the posts I've made are pure fluff. Otherwise, I don't see how I've made so much fluff that it's sad. At least I've put forth some effort into the game, unlike other people (Junglefever, The Paprika Killer to a lesser extend, and Xonar earlier in the game).SwordsRbroken said:SSBF is posting fluff in practically every post he makes. Scummy for sure. I wouldn't care if he was lynched.
I lead a nearly succesful lynch campaign against Xonar (Junglefever's vote was random), I mentioned my four suspects in details throughout the game, I have been active, and proved that all wishes comes with risks.
Optionally, do you have other reasons for wanting me gone aside from fluffs?
Then why is your vote on Junglefever? If you haven't noticed, he just came back yesterday and is promising a post that will contribute a lot more to the game. If you're going to persude your top suspect, why not vote for him?SwordsRbroken said:You are probably my favorite lynch as of right now for reasons already explained.
#635
That is true about the Nicholas1024 Vs. Overswarm, but when it comes to the Xonar Vs. Mentosman8 argument, are you skimming. Clownbot at the time already gave his opinion on that. the problem is that you have not searched for them.SwordsRbroken said:Have you even taken a stance on the Xonar/Mentos argument? Have you taken an opinion on the Nic/OS argument? No. Point these posts out to me and i will back down.
#637
You did say that you were considering putting Xonar as your top suspect due to Mentos's argument.Clownbot said:As for my actual stances, I don't really think too much of either argument you mentioned. I already said when Rockin asked me about Mentos/Xonar that neither of them looked particularly suspicious at the time and should be the lynch toDay,
@Junglefever: Add this into your big post you're promising. What is your opinion on Xonar? Explain it in detail. It's also recommend you re-read, as you have a few things to answer.
Some thoughts on the situation:
Overswarm is no longer one of my strongest town reads. I really hate his activity policy that he was trying to enforce, trying to force a end to RVS, giving out a terrible example, not explaining things, contradicting, misinterperating things, and a bit of skimming. I now have a slightly scummy read on him. He has made some great posts, thought, so that's why he isn't one of my top suspects, but if it comes to the time where Overswarm is about to get lynched and there's no way to get him out of it, I will gladly lynch him if necessary.
Junglefever is also skimming a bit since he has not answer one of my question yet (Will dig for it if you ask). A bit more scummier now. However, it is nice that he took the time to post. However, I want to see his more content-filled post he promised yesterday by today or my suspicion will continue to rise.
I want to hear more on Meta-Kirby on the situation. Meta-Kirby is going to get prodded soon. His last post was on May 6, 2010 at 1:42 PM. The rules said that you must post once every seventy-two hours and Meat-Kirby just broked that rule today. There is no excuse for this, especially since he's been checking the Desicive Games section numerous times during the course of that last post and now. I also noticed that he was tunneling me a bit. Since his analysis on the four people he thought were scums (Me, Xonar, Overswarm, and Cello Marl), he has dedicated most of his posts toward me. On top of that, he has not mentioned his case on Overswarm at all. I'm starting to become suspicous of him. However, I'm not really comfortable with lynching him yet, since he did improve his contribuation until his sudden disapperance from this thread.
Cello Marl is also looking ****** as well. I really didn't like a lot of points he made. I already made it obvious he was my 2nd lynch candidate after Xonar and this only emphaize it.
I am still getting a pretty scummy vibe from The Paprika Killer, but it's nice he's finally taking a stance with a vote on me.
Xonar is improving a little, but his past actions so overwhemingly surpass the goods he made, that he still remains my top lynch candidate. Whenever or not he'll improve enough to get him off my top suspect list will be something to watch. As I started a nearly successful lynch campaign against him, I'm not planning on unvoting him until I'm absolutely convince he's not my top suspect anymore OR if changing vote is necessary to get a lynch.
Want to hear more out of Mentosman8, especially since he's been active in Tree Stump Mafia, which could be ending soon. Will be interesting to see what he has to say on the matter going on now and where his next vote will go to. He needs to do it soon, thought, as it has been over fourty-eight hours as he posted. Once it hits May 10, 2010 at 2:19 PM, he will be under prod zone.
Kataefi and Meta-Kirby, please vote someone. Not voting is anti-town and it will not benefit us in the long run.
I'm actually really surprise that I'm suspecting over 1/3 of people here (Including Meta-Kirby, Overswarm, Cello Marl, Junglefever, The Paprika Killer, and of course, Xonar, but not Mentosman8). However, for convience sake, I'll list my top five suspects in order from least scummiest to most scummiest:
5): Overswarm
4): Junglefever
3): The Paprika Killer
2): Cello Marl
1): Xonar
I'd also like to remind you guys that deadline is approaching soon, so we need a lynch candidate. If you do not have a vote on someone (Meta-Kirby, Kataefi), vote now. A No Lynch is unaffordable in Mafia, especially in Day 1.
Wow, that's a mouthful to say. However, I was forced to cut corners a bit since Wordpad was being an ******* to me and messed a few of my quotes up. The links are still there, thought.