Then where’s Fierce Deity Final Smash?im pretty sure Young link is meant to rep Majora's mask.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Then where’s Fierce Deity Final Smash?im pretty sure Young link is meant to rep Majora's mask.
except nearly everything he has is based on the oot designsim pretty sure Young link is meant to rep Majora's mask.
Obviously, this is just your opinion, but I do think I think discussions about the size of the roster are relevant in so far as which characters are in will inevitably be tied to the size of the roster and which vets return. We know Sakurai doesn't seem to go into a project intending to cut characters (with a handful of exceptions, like Pichu and Young Link in Brawl) and characters often don't return because the team ran out of dev time and other veterans simply took priority. We also know from Ultimate's base game that bringing back too many vets can limit the number of newcomers, so roster size also impacts the new faces we may see. There's also the issue that some characters don't make as much sense when certain vets are present. For example, supporters of Waluigi and Bandana Dee will often argue for their inclusion because they're the two largest and most requested characters in their respective franchises not currently playable in Smash. That goes out the window when supporting Mario and Kirby characters aren't all present.I'm not gonna lie, and I realize saying this will only extend the conversation further, but I'm already tired of the arguments about roster size. At least when we talk about characters, or movesets and game mechanics, that's fun and spurring our creativity. These roster size conversations tend to go back and forth with pretentiousness about how this or that side makes more logical sense. May I remind everyone we are speculating about a game that does not exist, that doesn't really matter right now. Certainly not enough for people to get so heated about it.
Funny enough, it has historically been character choices that provoke frustrating tribalism within the community but now it's the drastically different perspectives on how the roster may look and evolve. Personally no, I don't think a 100 character roster is very likely at all. I'm gonna take Sakurai's word for now, because it's the only thing we have to work off of, and believe that we'll have to downsize a bit with some enhanced single player modes and new features to compensate. But I dunno, if you want to make a 40 character "reboot" roster or a 100 character "deluxe" one I'm not gonna dispute you so much on the size unless you are distinctly asking me if I think it's plausible. Right now it's my least favorite topic.
I think everyone's just made up their minds about what they want to believe for now and it doesn't seem like the discussion ever goes anywhere or gets through to someone who feels that staunchly about it already. If you believe we're getting an even bigger Smash game than Ultimate I don't think there's much I can personally say to convince you otherwise.
For sure, and I absolutely agree with this. It's a very relevant, hot button issue to talk about and I understand why it's a sticking point for so many people. But I also just don't personally feel inclined to participate in those discussions for very long because they're often circular - that is, when it's JUST about the size of the roster and not how it influences character choices. I have my own opinion of how big the next roster may be (presumably somewhere in the 60s) and that's reflected in my own expectations and eventual prediction roster.Obviously, this is just your opinion, but I do think I think discussions about the size of the roster are relevant in so far as which characters are in will inevitably be tied to the size of the roster and which vets return. We know Sakurai doesn't seem to go into a project intending to cut characters (with a handful of exceptions, like Pichu and Young Link in Brawl) and characters often don't return because the team ran out of dev time and other veterans simply took priority. We also know from Ultimate's base game that bringing back too many vets can limit the number of newcomers, so roster size also impacts the new faces we may see. There's also the issue that some characters don't make as much sense when certain vets are present. For example, supporters of Waluigi and Bandana Dee will often argue for their inclusion because they're the two largest and most requested characters in their respective franchises not currently playable in Smash. That goes out the window when supporting Mario and Kirby characters aren't all present.
And yeah, I'm enjoying this while it lasts LOL. I'm sure the tides will change once they formally announce a new game and people start participating who haven't bothered yet. I'm glad that, at least for now, a positive effect of this uncertainty of the future means people are more accepting of things they may not have been before so I can only hope everyone has been humbled by now.It's definitely annoying when people are wed to a certain vision of what the roster could be, but the conversation is still pretty open by Smash speculation standards. So far, no one saying that certain characters aren't worth discussing at all because it doesn't conform with their vision of the roster.
happened in scotlandthe first insult slung from human lips.
I could see a 100 character roster in Smash. Easily with a Ultimate DX edition. I can even picture easily a "Everyone Is Here AGAIN?!" DLC campaign. Would probably sell like hotcakes, it's easy marketing too. And there are loads of potential clones, semi clones and Echoes to think of with a roster coming from Ultimate. 100 doesn't even sound all that crazy to me honestly.Every single time there's a feeling a new Smash game is getting closer, people start talking about a "reboot", "massive cuts", "back to origin" type of conversations like it's logical and needed lol, but it NEVER happens. Any new Smash is ALWAYS going to be bigger than the previous one for one simple reason: that's its marketing appeal. Smash Ultimate is the best selling fighting game of all time for one simple reason: it's huge, its roster is insanely huge.
I've seen video "essays" (damn how is it that any Smash related video essay ends up being horrible lol) claiming there's no way next Smash is as big as Ultimate without any reason whatsoever. One of them said that we're getting back to a 50 character roster, which is big don't get me wrong, and then proceeded to cut Meta Knight, a perfectly implemented veteran, in favor of Bandana Dee "for reasons" lmao. Mega Man getting cut but Ryu still getting in, that kinda ****. It's so stupid it becomes annoying.
Yeah, we might get some cuts. And to be honest, there are a lot of characters who really do not deserve to come back: Dr. Mario, one of the Links, all the Fire Emblem clones, a couple of Pokémons, Mii Brawler really is enough so Gunner and Swordfighter can go, yep, it might happen. Basically all the clones or very similar concept characters. Maybe a few more for licensing / technical reasons (looking at Disney / Microsoft, or dual characters like the Climbers, Olimar or even Rosalina). 15 to 20 cuts out of the 89 now available is comprehensible, but it's not like we're not getting new incredible reps in return.
Of one thing I'm absolutely certain: Smash 6 is going to break the 100 character roster size one way or the other, through DLC, more clones, and completely new and fresh characters. There's no coming back, they can easily use Ultimate as a base for developing factors and do it. They've proven time and time again they can, and that they want to.
People claiming a complete rebuild of its gameplay are even more insane. Yes, we have a game which sold 30+ million copies in a genre which is usually considered niche. Let's completely change the next one! It makes so much sense! Same stupid talk happened before Ultimate released, see where it landed lmao. Probably the same "Ridley's too big", "Snake is never coming back", "Banjo and Sora are impossible" crowd. I don't know why they annoy me so much lol.
All I really need for the base game for the next Smash is one substantial new co-op and/or single player mode and one Fighter Pass’s worth of new characters and stages. From there, they can just start up the DLC again and I’m happy. Everything else can just be ported over from Ultimate besides a few changes for some characters like Ganondorf.I could see a 100 character roster in Smash. Easily with a Ultimate DX edition. I can even picture easily a "Everyone Is Here AGAIN?!" DLC campaign. Would probably sell like hotcakes, it's easy marketing too. And there are loads of potential clones, semi clones and Echoes to think of with a roster coming from Ultimate. 100 doesn't even sound all that crazy to me honestly.
I got one idea for a new mode. Assist Smash. Certain assists can be playable in either fighting themselves or team up with normal fighters. There 3 qualify features that assists to be playable. Moving around and teleporting from point A to point B, attack, and get damaged and KO. The down side is that they're not strong as they are normally summoned outside of this mode.All I really need for the base game for the next Smash is one substantial new co-op and/or single player mode and one Fighter Pass’s worth of new characters and stages. From there, they can just start up the DLC again and I’m happy. Everything else can just be ported over from Ultimate besides a few changes for some characters like Ganondorf.
My idea for Ultimate DX basically boils down to:I could see a 100 character roster in Smash. Easily with a Ultimate DX edition. I can even picture easily a "Everyone Is Here AGAIN?!" DLC campaign. Would probably sell like hotcakes, it's easy marketing too. And there are loads of potential clones, semi clones and Echoes to think of with a roster coming from Ultimate. 100 doesn't even sound all that crazy to me honestly.
Fixed.Is still a pretty good spread compared to past games, I'd probably just change Sheik back to her sole canon Ocarina of Time look, Ganondorf to hisTwilight PrincessTears of the Kingdom look, and if Young Link where to come back, give him his Majora's Mask gear and you're pretty much golden.
I mean...that's not really a different Link/era than OoT.im pretty sure Young link is meant to rep Majora's mask.
My idea for Ultimate DX basically boils down to:
To me, yes, as there would be no reason to do one due to the large install base of the Switch.General question: if/when we get confirmation that the next system has bc (it better), would that change your opinion on the likelihood of a deluxe edition?
Crossgen game update that is pretty much a "true 2.0 update" for the game (plus new Fighter's Passes).General question: if/when we get confirmation that the next system has bc (it better), would that change your opinion on the likelihood of a deluxe edition?
Well...While I don't see it happening officially, you're only 11 Characters away from 100 so it's feasible. As a matter of fact, I'm going to do it now:
- Oatchi
- Bandanna Waddle Dee
- Mio
- Pig Ganon
- Minerva
- Primarina
- Madeline
- Phoenix Wright
- Black Mage
- Eggman
- Doomguy
To be honest, at that point they're better off just doing additional DLC / a third Fighter Pass if they absolutely need to keep Smash Ultimate alive. I don't think a Deluxe version is going to happen regardless of what the next console looks like because of a multitude of copyright issues and companies I do not see cooperating in letting their characters be sold as part of a base title (Disney). So if you're running into those issues, and the game is already playing on that console, just keep building on the one everyone already has.General question: if/when we get confirmation that the next system has bc (it better), would that change your opinion on the likelihood of a deluxe edition?
Me too! (In no particular order)While I don't see it happening officially, you're only 11 Characters away from 100 so it's feasible. As a matter of fact, I'm going to do it now:
As for my 11 fighters:My idea for Ultimate DX basically boils down to:
- 11 new fighters (8 unique, 3 Echoes)
- Smash Run
- World of Light, Classic Mode and Spirit Battles are reworked with consideration to characters who debuted in Smash after Ultimate first released in December 2018
- Mode Builder where you can create either Target Test / Board the Platforms or your own Classic Mode route
- Assist Trophies for the franchises that debuted as DLC
- New Poké Ball summons based Gens VIII and IX
* denotes a stage unavailable when you select Stage Morph
- Skins for Battlefield, Big Battlefield and Final Destination based on 64, Melee, Brawl, 3DS and Wii U
- Planet Zebes
- Sector Z
- Icicle Mountain*
- Mute City
- Mushroom Kingdom (Melee)
- Poké Floats
- Rumble Falls*
- PictoChat
- Rainbow Road
- Pac-Maze
- Jungle Hijinxs*
- Pyrosphere* (Ridley is replaced by Mecha-Ridley)
- Woolly World
- Orbital Gate Assault*
1. Mirage!Chrom + ItsukiWhile I don't see it happening officially, you're only 11 Characters away from 100 so it's feasible. As a matter of fact, I'm going to do it now:
- Oatchi
- Bandanna Waddle Dee
- Mio
- Pig Ganon
- Minerva
- Primarina
- Madeline
- Phoenix Wright
- Black Mage
- Eggman
- Doomguy
I feel as soon as the next Smash is announced her fanbase will reignite. She's always been a decently popular character in discussion, even as far back as Brawl IIRC, and I don't see that changing as nothing in the past few years has shifted focus away from her in Warioware to my knowledge. If anything, the aforementioned increased focus on the WW team as a dysfunctional family may actually benefit her as it allows the cast to stick more with people both in and out of the franchise as the series continues to grow.I think Ashley is a dark horse in terms of first party candidates. Wario Ware is going through a Renaissance ever since Wario Ware Gold came out. It's had three new games in the last five years and each of them are selling decently. Ashley is the de facto pick for a new Wario character and we know she's a popular character.
What do you guys think about Ashley? Would she be a good choice? How would she work? Do you think her fanbase will recover?
I also think issues with the third-parties being in base rather than DLC are one reason a port isn't as likely as people think, but I've not really raised it because I haven't felt "I don't think Square/Disney/possibly others will be easily amenable to that" was defensible enough, even though I think it's the truth.I don't think a Deluxe version is going to happen regardless of what the next console looks like because of a multitude of copyright issues and companies I do not see cooperating in letting their characters be sold as part of a base title (Disney).
It's also a bad move. The reason why the Wii U ports worked for Switch was because the Wii U was a flop and for many people this was their first experience with these games. This is not the case with the Switch. And I don't think people would want to buy a game that they could potentially play on their system already through backwards compatibility.I also think issues with the third-parties being in base rather than DLC are one reason a port isn't as likely as people think, but I've not really raised it because I haven't felt "I don't think Square/Disney/possibly others will be easily amenable to that" was defensible enough, even though I think it's the truth.
I think Square in particular is resistant to that kind of thing without reaching major compromises. Maybe Disney too, idk.
I just cant think of anyone at this point, all the big name Nintendo all stars have been in the series since Brawl so at this point the Nintendo characters we do get unless their from a new game thats popular like Mythra and Byleth are gonna feel very underwhelming to me.Speaking on Ashley reminds me how little attention first-parties get in speculation these days, despite them probably comprising at the very least half of the next game's newcomers. And at most, most.
Something about your profile picture elicits some kind of smug aura to me.It's also a bad move. The reason why the Wii U ports worked for Switch was because the Wii U was a flop and for many people this was their first experience with these games. This is not the case with the Switch. And I don't think people would want to buy a game that they could potentially play on their system already through backwards compatibility.
It's not a bad move as much as one that may just be seen as superfluous. Any Smash Bros game will likely sell well, even a port. Even a port on a system with bc. It's just one that may be more complicated to deliver than people realize and will probably be unnecessary if the next new Smash is intended to arrive any sooner than the tail end of the system.It's also a bad move. The reason why the Wii U ports worked for Switch was because the Wii U was a flop and for many people this was their first experience with these games. This is not the case with the Switch. And I don't think people would want to buy a game that they could potentially play on their system already through backwards compatibility.
Something about your profile picture elicits some kind of smug aura to me.
We've been talking first parties quite a lot, we were just talking about Zelda and today we were talking about Wario. Before that I brought up the question of distinctly which first party series grew during the Switch era with room to expand in the next game. I feel like first parties have actually kinda been the dominant conversation point here for a little bit.It is a shame that we don’t talk about first parties as much. But I guess people just aren’t that interested. Shame really but what can you dobesides bring up chibi-robo all the time
Ngl, as someone who has Mona as their #1 request for the next Wario character, I'm in a bit of a bind here. Like, it could just be me, but it felt like Mona gained a lot more prominence as a character ever since Gold (to the point that Get It Together made more of a show of featuring her as Wario's #2 in the context of WarioWare), but despite that I'm a bit worried that it won't mean much for my girl in the long run...Something pretty interesting that was brought to my attention recently, working off a conversation I started a week or so ago. I mostly brought up that I considered Animal Crossing, Splatoon and Pikmin to be some of the biggest winners of the last generation and worth considering as some of their big dogs, especially when considering what first party content may be added in a future Smash incarnation. But Nintendo made a pretty interesting addition to their series portals on their Japanese site recently.
Lo and behold, Wario gets to sit among Nintendo's heaviest hitters. Granted this could definitely be more of a promotional move for the release of WarioWare Move It, but I thought it was neat to see him there. Also take notice, Wario Land truthers, that the series is simply labeled "Wario". Not reading too much into it right now but I'd love to see them start pushing Wario even more in the future.
I guess to tie it into Smash, how do you guys think Wario can get expanded on next time around? I'll ignore the obvious Wario Land part in favor of mentioning that not even WarioWARE got much new content in Smash Ultimate - in fact it outright lost content since Kat & Ana did not return as an Assist Trophy. Brawl's collection of Ware remixes are some of my favorite in the entire series, provide such a fun wacky flair to the game and it makes me upset that we haven't seen too much more since then. I think ignoring Body Rock from WarioWare DIY was a heinous crime.
I'm not sure if I'd necessarily advocate for more characters - I wouldn't turn them down whatsoever, but I think we're okay as is. Giving major players like Mona or Jimmy T just a bit more presence in the game some way or another would be appreciated though. Maybe as additional ATs or stage cameos.
It is a shame that we don’t talk about first parties as much. But I guess people just aren’t that interested. Shame really but what can you dobesides bring up chibi-robo all the time
While it IS nice to see some first-party discussion here, it's a bit of a bummer to see that, in general, first-parties are pretty overall ignored ever since Snake was announced for Brawl. Don't get me wrong, even I'VE got third-parties I'd like to see in Smash, but still.We've been talking first parties quite a lot, we were just talking about Zelda and today we were talking about Wario. Before that I brought up the question of distinctly which first party series grew during the Switch era with room to expand in the next game. I feel like first parties have actually kinda been the dominant conversation point here for a little bit.
Sorry to be a smartass, I just think that's pretty neat and wanted to give credit where it's due since you would probably expect the opposite. Personally I do find talking about first parties much more engaging right now, I already kinda know which third parties I expect / am rooting to join in the future and first parties are a lot more flexible.