DynamicSmasher
Smash Apprentice
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2015
- Messages
- 101
I think it's less about being the avatar character and more a mix of making interesting gameplay and representing the totality of a given game. With the FE characters especially, Robin was chosen because magic + sword was more interesting than just sword, which Chrom would have been(Robin's Palutena's guidance even points this out), while Corrin and Byleth are the main neutral reps in games with multiple paths. If 3 Houses was 1 House and you always had to go Crimson Flower, then I could see Edelgard being picked over Byleth, for example. Inkling, Villager and Steve/Alex/MC avatar are the only playable characters in their games, making them obvious picks.I know Smash Bros does tend to prefer the avatar character over the important recognisable character, but Cross/Ryan over Elma would feel like such a monumental mistake. Cross but such a nothing nothing to me and I really disliked his customisation options, especially his face. Going from generic battle quotes to complete silence in cutscenes was off-putting to me, he was just too much of a nonentity. And Elma was very obviously the actual main character.
The main outlier would probably be Joker, but Joker is much more story-important cross. Joker is the impetus for the Phantom Thieves forming, their leader and the one who beats the final boss. And the final boss after the final boss. Cross, by comparison, is more of a supporting protagonist- part of team Elma, but not its leader or especially important in the main narrative. That could change with Definitive edition I suppose, but I seriously doubt that it will, seeing as how that appears to be more about Mira itself and what happened to Lao and to Elma's partner.