Literally speaking Digimon is straight up video game characters (Unless they debuted in the anime, then probably not). No ifs ands or buts about it. People can gatekeep them all they want (even if said people are the devs) but as far as this rule is concerned, this rule should not be an issue when considering the inclusion of Digimon. What will keep them out of the game for a while (like, multiple games) is the fact that Digimon as a series isn't really relevant in today's market, and Heihachi and Lloyd exist.
This doesn't really matter in my opinion as the Nintendo relation requirement has been stretched to "they're going to be in that one low profile spin off of a spin off soon".
Sorry if I sound aggressive here, I'm just being a bit more blunt than normal. I need to get some sleep. 6 AM's not going to come any later. lol
I'm going to be honest here..were it not for wanting Digimon to appear in Smash Bros..would anyone here really consider an LCD Game a Video Game?
LCD Games are their own thing, in my opinion. Its not 'gatekeeping', its an opinion. To me, a Video Game is something played on a Video Game Console, a Handheld, or a PC. I consider LCD games, including Tomagatchi, Virtual Pets, Digimon, Pocket Pikachu, and, yes, Game & Watch as 'toys'. There is nothing wrong with being an Electronic Handheld Game. A lot of people will use the term 'Video Games' for these types of games, but they aren't, they are something different called Electronic Games.
Heck, even the Digimon entry on Wikipedia says the series consists of 'virtual pet toys, anime, manga, video games, films, and a trading card game' placing virtual pet toys and video games as separate entities. The entry for the original virtual pet thing is also referred to as such.
No one refers to the virtual pet Digimon, Tamagotchi, or other things like Pokémon Pikachu (Digital Pet) as video games, that's all I'm saying. Outside of the context of 'can Agumon get into Smash Bros', no one would argue that virtual pets are video games.
But yeah, they won't make it in over Namco's big name series.
Not..really the point here..we aren't talking about 'Nintendo Relation', we're talking about literally part of Nintendo's history, they made it, its part of what got them to where they are.
And who in the universe created this magical rule that if it's something from Nintendo, anything can appear in Smash?
Let's put Nintendo's 1889 Hanafuda on Smash now?
View attachment 243806
That would be Sakurai who decided that. There's a reason that various non-game things for Nintendo, and only Nintendo, get to appear in Super Smash Bros.
He's literally the only person who's view on what's 'okay' to appear in the game matters.