This is like saying "if Nintendo is so hell bent on limiting character designs in Paper Mario why are the spirits of old partners in Smash Ultimate?". Just because things like these get minor acknowledgements instead of being deleted from history doesn't mean they are what Nintendo has in mind going forward.
It's funny that it's ONLY in the context of Geno discussion that people will fight tooth and nail to deny the obvious truth of Nintendo keeping a much tighter leash on what outsiders are allowed to do with the Mario brand and pushing a more sanitized and centralized version of it during the last decade.
Are you arguing that Geno would get a new series icon or would just not be added at all? It’s not you, it’s me lol.
If it’s the former, I don’t think that makes any sense. That’s like saying, “Geno isn’t a Mario character...he’s a Super Mario RPG character!” Which just sounds weird and doesn’t meet the objective of “separating him from mainstream Mario”. It inherently connects him to Mario.
It just seems pretty clear to me that if they
didn’t want to draw attention to a non-mainstream Mario character they just wouldn’t add the character.
If it’s the latter, then I think we agree. Though, I really do like Geno as a character. But my main point is this: If Nintendo is choosing DLC, and choosing to celebrate ALL Mario content in Smash Ultimate from November to December, then it makes the
most sense to have all Mario content in the game as of the time of the tournament. Just logically, “all Mario characters, stages, items” in a tournament. If Waluigi or Geno were planned then it would make sense to celebrate “all Mario characters, stages, items” with them included as a playable character as planned.
Considering it’s a scheduled tourney, I’m thinking Waluigi or Geno MIGHT be on a timer here. Could very well be wrong, but it doesn’t make much sense by Nintendo’s planning to do it any other way imho.