True Blue Warrior
Smash Hero
Claiming ARMS isn’t an actual fighting game but a tech demo is the dumbest argument I’ve read since someone argued that Ice Climber is more popular than SNK games.It's gatekeeper bull**** o'clock huh
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Claiming ARMS isn’t an actual fighting game but a tech demo is the dumbest argument I’ve read since someone argued that Ice Climber is more popular than SNK games.It's gatekeeper bull**** o'clock huh
I mean in fairness nobody would claim Punch-Out!! is a fighting game unless they had no idea how the game worked.I'd at least consider ARMS as more of a fighter than something like Punch-Out! which is pretty much a glorified puzzle game.
From what I've heard, Namco doesn't own her at all anymore.And that's off the top of my head. That's not even counting Ms. Pac-Man, though the rights are weird with the character, so that could be why she's not an Echo. I'm sure there's some more Bamco options too of note.
Hmm. I wouldn't call it a puzzle game per-se, but the challenge is more on pattern recognition and reflexes than learning how your character works in order to beat someone else, or a CPU if you don't have friends so I guess you have a point.I'd at least consider ARMS as more of a fighter than something like Punch-Out! which is pretty much a glorified puzzle game.
Would be nice if they revealed it three months ago but, here we are.would be nice if we got some character reveals today just sayin
We will get character reveals. They'll just drop in June 30th.You know
today marks 1 year since hero and banjo’s reveals
would be nice if we got some character reveals today just sayin
Bold of you to assume we'll get more than ARMSWe will get character reveals. They'll just drop in June 30th.
Lloyd and Heihachi would make sense as E3 type reveals had E3 still been a thing.I'm still convinced we'll see more Bandai Namco content at some point. Nintendo still recognizes the value of working with them, and a franchise like Tekken, Tales, or Dark Souls are all popular Japanese gaming mainstays that could swing them to pick Bandai Namco characters again. Plus, Bandai Namco makes Smash, so they're probably one of the easier third parties to work with when they want more content. They supported Smash 4's DLC cycle with several Mii costumes, so I'd be surprised to see those costumes not return in any capacity.
My money is still on either Lloyd or Heihachi. Lloyd is a longtime fan request for Smash and someone Sakurai has expressed interest for in the past as the Tales rep, so I could see Nintendo going that angle. Or I could see them just recognizing how big Tekken is and recognizing the appeal of Street Fighter X King of Fighters X Tekken in addition to all of their IPs. Sure, Sakurai said he initially had trouble making Heihachi work... but as others have pointed out, he has a tendency to revisit concepts that he may have initially struggled with in prior titles and also if Nintendo chooses Tekken, I'm sure Sakurai would find a way to make it work for them even if it required a lot of work and creativity on his part.
Japan likes Dark Souls?...Dark Souls are all popular Japanese gaming mainstays that could swing them to pick Bandai Namco characters again.
Still don't understand why she was allowed on the Pac-Land stage but nothing else, not even a Spirit.From what I've heard, Namco doesn't own her at all anymore.
Either that or the legal battle was for distribution rights, and they could still theoretically use her for purposes that have nothing to do with the Ms. PAC-MAN arcade. Kinda doubt it though.
Well I'd still rather have Lloyd in Smash than Yuri so it appears we're at an impasse.Id still rather have Yuri in smash then Lloyd
Do they have to pay royalties for using the characters at all or just the arcade game?Basically after a 2006 lawsuit, certain releases of the original Ms. Pac-Man arcade game meant Bandai-Namco had to pay royalties to GCC, the original developers of the game. This has led to a gradual de-emphasis of the character in various marketing and media, to the point where various international stores/arcades had an unrelated female Pac character in her place for ads. It got even more muddled when those royalty rights were purchased by the ever dubious ATGames, most famous for releasing dubious plug and play consoles. Basically Bandi-Namco is stuck potentially paying money to a company that they sued for making an authorized Ms Pac-Man arcade cabinet back in 2019.
Yes. The first Dark Souls started strong (2011 article) and and III likewise did really well (2016 article) there on release.Japan likes Dark Souls?
Just the arcade game, but there could be a mindset that they have no interest in promoting a character whose most notable game to re-release is one they're stuck paying royalties for. Plus they might just be playing it safe in regards to use of the character for various games just in case. That's just speculation, but it does seem telling that her appearances in Pac-Man marketing have noticeably fallen the past 15 years.Do they have to pay royalties for using the characters at all or just the arcade game?
I hope that whichever one gets in we end up with music from multiple tales of games and not just the one they picked for the playable roster.Id still rather have Yuri in smash then Lloyd
It's worth noting that ARMS fell off since it didn't get the confidence / support it needed. There were some tournaments - EVO Japan 2018 for example - but things went somewhat awry already by then:ARMS is a fighting game.
It has a multitude of characters who play differently from each other, on a stage and the game is centered around one on one melee combat. Just because it's from behind the shoulder, doesn't have a strong backstory or there's a limited number of moves doesn't make it not a fighting game.
To think we'd hear this argument from freaking Smashboards of all places.
Like most of the small scenes that dot the competitive video game landscape, the ARMS scene is propped up by its players, who form teams and organize tournaments to keep competition active. Though a few players are sponsored by teams, for the most part it is a community effort; a wrinkle highlighted by news of Joseph “TenTanMan” Mills being let go from his small sponsorship.
The playerbase is there, but it's difficult for them to grow if there's not much confidence in the game from outside the playerbase. I do believe that FP6 is Nintendo's way to try and push the reset button on ARMS and start fresh (it sold pretty well but tapered off hard, leaving the small competitive scene). If anything, ARMS could do well - I just think it could use some changes. Expanded modes or whatever.Mills is the No. 1 ARMS player in the United States, an achievement he tells Compete was initially “a joke to pull people in.” Less than a month away from the game’s biggest event yet [EVO Japan 2018], one of the top players in the world had to open a crowdfunding platform to pay for his ticket to the main stage. (His goal, however, was met in just two hours.)
Unpopular opinion, but I think Taizo Hori from Dig Dug would make not only a cool 2nd Bamco rep, but also a 3rd party retro rep.I'm still convinced we'll see more Bandai Namco content at some point. Nintendo still recognizes the value of working with them, and a franchise like Tekken, Tales, or Dark Souls are all popular Japanese gaming mainstays that could swing them to pick Bandai Namco characters again. Plus, Bandai Namco makes Smash, so they're probably one of the easier third parties to work with when they want more content. They supported Smash 4's DLC cycle with several Mii costumes, so I'd be surprised to see those costumes not return in any capacity.
I'm not sure what that means in reply to my comment. Marvel vs Capcom Infinite's playerbase crashed and burnt too but that doesn't make it not a fighting game either.It's worth noting that ARMS fell off since it didn't get the confidence / support it needed. There were some tournaments - EVO Japan 2018 for example - but things went somewhat awry already by then:
The playerbase is there, but it's difficult for them to grow if there's not much confidence in the game from outside the playerbase. I do believe that FP6 is Nintendo's way to try and push the reset button on ARMS and start fresh (it sold pretty well but tapered off hard, leaving the small competitive scene). If anything, ARMS could do well - I just think it could use some changes. Expanded modes or whatever.
So basically, the only way Ms. PAC-MAN is coming back is if they try and bring back PAC-MAN World?Just the arcade game, but there could be a mindset that they have no interest in promoting a character whose most notable game to re-release is one they're stuck paying royalties for. Plus they might just be playing it safe in regards to use of the character for various games just in case. That's just speculation, but it does seem telling that her appearances in Pac-Man marketing have noticeably fallen the past 15 years.
Well I wasn't a part of Super Smash Bros. Brawl's hype cycle, and the rest of these characters are just ok in my opinion, so...All of them?What do you guys consider to be the most hypest character reveal?
If I had to guess it'd come down toand
Guess it came down to/or
I had the percieved limitations and the comparision with Melee in mind (which competitive scene also started small, but became long lasting because there was confidence in the game). I'm not meaning that as a burn towards ARMS - ARMS can do well, people didn't feel that confident in it since it was seen as limited (not that ARMS is limited - the competitive scene shows it's far from - but perception = / = reality).I'm not sure what that means in reply to my comment. Marvel vs Capcom Infinite's playerbase crashed and burnt too but that doesn't make it not a fighting game either.
for me. Easily.What do you guys consider to be the most hypest character reveal?
If I had to guess it'd come down toand
Guess it came down to/or
Obviously Crash when he inevitably gets in...PleaseWhat do you guys consider to be the most hypest character reveal?
If I had to guess it'd come down toand
Guess it came down to/or
Sonic was hype because he was like the only Brawl character with a proper trailer. I will never forget the level of excitement my 10 year old self had when he was revealed back in 07. It was the same feeling I had with Megaman at Smash 4's reveal and Joker at the game awards, those characters resonated with me more than anyone else.What do you guys consider to be the most hypest character reveal?
If I had to guess it'd come down toand
Guess it came down to/or
It's not reasonable to call Punch-Out a fighting game at all. Sure you do LITERALLY fight, but in the context of video games the genre "fighting" means something completely different from Punch-Out. You would never reccomend it to someone looking to get into fighting games.Punch-Out is a Sports game with puzzle elements as the core idea behind the gameplay. The type of sports game it is, boxing, makes it reasonable to call it a fighting game too.
So, about those legal disputes.....As far as Ms. Pac-Man, the situation with her is a bit of legal nightmare as this video details:
Basically after a 2006 lawsuit, certain releases of the original Ms. Pac-Man arcade game meant Bandai-Namco had to pay royalties to GCC, the original developers of the game. This has led to a gradual de-emphasis of the character in various marketing and media, to the point where various international stores/mobile games have an unrelated female Pac character in her place. It got even more muddled when Bandi-Namco sued ATGames, most famous for releasing dubious plug and play consoles, for making an unauthorized Ms. Pac-Man cabinet. To make matters worse, ATGames ended up buying those aforementioned royalty rights from GCC, meaning Bando-Namco, (for specific Ms. Pac-Man re-releases) has to give royalties to a company they not terribly inclined to work with given ATGames' shenanigans.
Is this something that Namco did?So, about those legal disputes.....
Something just came out today.
It's about as dumb as the time someone said Pacman was a literal whoClaiming ARMS isn’t an actual fighting game but a tech demo is the dumbest argument I’ve read since someone argued that Ice Climber is more popular than SNK games.