SMAASH! Puppy
Smash Legend
It seems they're responsible for Bioshock, Civilization, Grand Theft Auto, and (lol) Duke Nukem Forever.Take 2: not familiar with them
EDIT: Also L.A. Noir and Kerbal Space Program.
Last edited:
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
It seems they're responsible for Bioshock, Civilization, Grand Theft Auto, and (lol) Duke Nukem Forever.Take 2: not familiar with them
... eh. If we're talking these kinds of characters for Smash, I can think of one that offers an even better flavor...You know, I find it incredibly distasteful that here we are, discussing 1st party characters like Tingle and some kid who hides behind a spiky mask, or 4 dead people, when we're overlooking arguably the greatest potential pick of all time.
This pick, mind you, would bring a whole new flavor to Smash Ultimate. The moveset potential...has gaming history attached to them, while not even being a gaming character at their core.
An IP that crosses over with many different gaming events, is internationally recognized, and has remained relevant since it's inception...
You're damn right.
It's ****ing Pepsi Man!
View attachment 273024
We know Bioshock is coming... and I thought GTA and LA Noire were Rockstar?It seems they're responsible for Bioshock, Civilization, Grand Theft Auto, and (lol) Duke Nukem Forever.
EDIT: Also L.A. Noir and Kerbal Space Program.
Thinking about it, I'm very likely incorrect in saying they're responsible for them. It seems Take 2 is just a publisher.We know Bioshock is coming... and I thought GTA and LA Noire were Rockstar?
Anyway with that in mind I’d expect a Civ port or something
Take-Two Interactive Software is a leading game publisher, creating games through its labels, Rockstar Games, 2K, Private Division, and Social Point.
Take Two is Rockstar's parent companyWe know Bioshock is coming... and I thought GTA and LA Noire were Rockstar?
Anyway with that in mind I’d expect a Civ port or something cause we already know Bioshock Collection is on its way
I haven't played RR in a long time so my memories may not be up to date, but I don't think RR Tingle was like WW Tingle. In Rosy Rupeeland Tingle decides to get out of home and get filthy rich by getting ruppees around the world, whether it's from saving people or beating up monsters. In RR Tingle is a man of action and most of his interactions with the characters are commerce related where he haggles them for items and whatnot. His brothers don't appear in RR though so it seems that bit of information is solely tied to WW. Tingle is still a greedy little ass, but he's a charming greedy little ass.It's not just the fetch quest either. The guy was a slave driver, which is a complete 180 on his very benevolent MM incarnation. Single WW, every version of Tingle was toned down, though sometimes greedy, to be a lot better as a person. The fetch quest sucked too, mind you. I mean, I find the long sailing fun and all(an unpopular opinion), but as much as I love a good grind, it wasn't a well-made quest piece. The rest of the game was significantly better, and the Tingle Tuner was also a good item for a particular gimmick/game add-on kind of thing. Paying Tingle to drop items from anywhere/bomb places you can't reach, etc? That's cool. Him being a slave-driver and overcharging you to save the world? Not cool.
I'm a giant Tingle fan, but there's no denying he's an awful person in WW alone. Rosy Rupeeland makes the "charge an arm and a leg" bit less bothersome, as this version of the character, though only in hindsight, is from that culture. Now how he treats his brothers? Where'd that come from. Though I haven't played RR just yet, nor looked at all of the story, so I dunno if him suddenly being a slave driver remotely fits within that story either. I know the game has more adult moments that'd need censoring too(one of the final ending scenes where it's clear something sexual happens. At the very least it's pretty hard implied). Its greedy nature may have also been a factor, as if I remember right, not all of the Tingle games made it to Europe either. So I dunno if it's just "Americans Hate Tingle" regardless of that.
I wish they stuck to his MM self. It's good they improved his Toon version after WW and all, but they already had a neat lovable character who was very silly but helpful.
And then in the second game he's searching for love. How does he accomplish this? By buying it of course! No one would love a short chubby dude in a fairy costume otherwise!I haven't played RR in a long time so my memories may not be up to date, but I don't think RR Tingle was like WW Tingle. In Rosy Rupeeland Tingle decides to get out of home and get filthy rich by getting ruppees around the world, whether it's from saving people or beating up monsters. In RR Tingle is a man of action and most of his interactions with the characters are commerce related where he haggles them for items and whatnot. His brothers don't appear in RR though so it seems that bit of information is solely tied to WW. Tingle is still a greedy little ass, but he's a charming greedy little ass.
And yeah I agree with you that MM was his best iteration personality wise.
This shall only be acceptable if I get a specific alt.You know, I find it incredibly distasteful that here we are, discussing 1st party characters like Tingle and some kid who hides behind a spiky mask, or 4 dead people, when we're overlooking arguably the greatest potential pick of all time.
This pick, mind you, would bring a whole new flavor to Smash Ultimate. The moveset potential...has gaming history attached to them, while not even being a gaming character at their core.
An IP that crosses over with many different gaming events, is internationally recognized, and has remained relevant since it's inception...
You're damn right.
It's ****ing Pepsi Man!
View attachment 273024
I mean it's not entirely their fault though. Everytime I enter that thread I always see the odd person come in and rile up the Geno fans by being coy by asking why people want him. The question is fair enough but it gets constantly used as a front to annoy them, even then most Geno fans on that thread seem to keep their cool about it.from how passive agressive Ive seen that thread be toword people, I dont know if I want him in just to knock them down a peg and teach them being passive agressive isnt cute
To be fair that applies to damn near every support threadThe Geno thread wouldn't be so bad if the users there would (1) learn how to ignore trolls, and (2) realize that there's a world outside of Geno.
I can't remember the last time they had a positive, supportive reaction to a new character. They best they could say about ARMS is that Spirits may not be deconfirmations, and Geno would be more likely if that were true.
They also need to not stan every "leaker" and YouTube personality who thinks Geno miiiiiight get in.The Geno thread wouldn't be so bad if the users there would (1) learn how to ignore trolls, and (2) realize that there's a world outside of Geno.
I can't remember the last time they had a positive, supportive reaction to a new character. They best they could say about ARMS is that Spirits may not be deconfirmations, and Geno would be more likely if that were true.
look fam I understand, but no, that doesnt excuse the passive agressive attitudes. Im sorry, im sure some of them are good people But they are really cocky and such but they fail to understand that they are. And I dont know a single person on earth that Likes overly cocky and passive agressive peopleI mean it's not entirely their fault though. Everytime I enter that thread I always see the odd person come in and rile up the Geno fans by being coy by asking why people want him. The question is fair enough but it gets constantly used as a front to annoy them, even then most Geno fans on that thread seem to keep their cool about it.
That's just my take on that thread.
Wrecking Crew is... Weird...Yeah, apparently Wrecking Crew is distinct enough to get it's own symbol?
Not gonna argue with anything but just wanted to point out something:Restocks don't necessarily work as a convincing marker on what will come newcomer wise specifically because they don't need to be related to any updates to the game. Amiibo "Theory" worked previously because the game had to be updated to support Amiibo functionality for brand new Amiibo, whereas these are entirely dependent on the production lines for the Amiibo themselves that have obviously been impacted by current events. The Amiibo restock was originally planned for much earlier, but got pushed back to June due to the production issues surrounding COVID-19. It's almost certainly a coincidence that the Amiibo restock fell on the same month as the ARMS character's release, and saying between June 5th and June 27th for the already announced ARMS character releasing in June doesn't really feel like it says much at all.
I mean Rosalina has done far more than any other character outside of the Triforce Trio in Zelda. Skull Kid "appearing 3 times" in Zelda doesn't really mean much when it's just Skull Kids as the race and not the specific character with Majora's Mask that we commonly associate as "Skull Kid." Even Impa doesn't really get much of a chance to do anything outside of Skyward Sword (She's important to OoT, but she barely appears in the game itself). Also, Rosalina just pretty much had timing and interest on her side TBH. Sakurai has just always gone back to the Mario well as opposed to the Zelda one, and at this point in time, there's not a ton of incentive to add another Zelda character as there aren't currently major Zelda characters in a good position timing wise or even popularity wise.
Is it "Fair"? I guess not, but I don't exactly expect Smash to be. Sakurai seems to have chosen to represent the various Zelda games in different ways rather than unique playable fighters as I previously spoke to in my post demonstrating the love Zelda gets in Smash outside of playable fighters. Hyrule Warriors has shown how unique Zelda characters can be when that much time and development is devoted to them, but it's just never been a priority for Smash in the same way it seems.
The Geno thread wouldn't be so bad if the users there would (1) learn how to ignore trolls, and (2) realize that there's a world outside of Geno.
I can't remember the last time they had a positive, supportive reaction to a new character. They best they could say about ARMS is that Spirits may not be deconfirmations, and Geno would be more likely if that were true.
I hate this as if TWEWY 2 chooses to modernize it's depiction of youth culture then that'd mean Neku would be the kind of guy to make a kpop fancam video on twitter to celebrateI'm going to laugh very hard when Min Min breaks the spirit rule and five minuts later, Sakurai announces Neku as the Square rep to promote TWEWY2.
"Playable content isn't the only content that matters."Which it does. It has 6 different characters, tons of stages, items, Assist Trophies, and music. It's never been as big of a series as Mario and has barely any spin-off games made. There's, what, 10? The CD-i games(which Nintendo had to be forced to let happen due to court), Link's Crossbow Training, the three Tingle games, and the three Hyrule Warrior games. And the three HW games also were mostly updated re-releases so maybe 2 at most for the HW series. The rest are main story entries, with at best mini-games. Oh, I forgot about Tetra's Trackers, but I don't think that properly was more than just a mini-game in a game?? I might be wrong. Compared to Mario Kart, the Mario RPG's, Mario Party, Mario Tennis, Mario Golf, and more...
Yeah, it's pretty clear there's a world of difference. For the most part, Zelda's cast is somewhat similar to Fire Emblem's, where circumstance majorly got characters in, and half have another similar playable character(3 Links, Marth/Lucina, Roy/Chrom. Not meaning Roy plays similar to Marth when I say this. But as I said, "similar", not the same). Zelda is bigger than FE overall, yes, but it also still has more content than FE in return. Playable content isn't the only content that matters.
Welp, I never thought I was gonna post this meme I did long back here, but oh welp."Playable content isn't the only content that matters."
You're right, FE didn't get anything other than fighters in Ultimate so far.
No spirits.
No assists.
No new item.
No new stages.
Nothing but Byleth and an Echo.
No offense, but as a Zelda fan, I'd be more than willing to trade all our "luxurious content we take for granted" with FE.
It's funny how that meme got outdated due to Zelda getting even more Mii costumes and Spirits tbh, even if I get the complaint, lots of FE fans said they'd rather have had more non playable representation of Corrin back in the day and FE was lacking in that department until Ultimate. For the most part anyway, wild how Fates only gets to have 1 song from it'a OSTGeno will always be a strange phenomenon to me...
It's not just that he's a one-off, it's what he's a one-off to: A side character from a two decades old spin-off from a much more massive franchise that has a consistent cast, and who doesn't even legally belongs to that series.
Yet people have latched on to him due to a comment Sakurai made around Brawl's time.
That managed to get him a costume as DLC in 4, and then in Ultimate he's a Legendary Spirit and online profile icon. But outside of Smash... He rarely gets mentioned, even within the Mario fanbase, I'm pretty sure people speak more of Paper Mario characters and Fawful.
Welp, I never thought I was gonna post this meme I did long back here, but oh welp.
Sheik’s a one off too, but she’s in a different camp. For one, she’s literally Zelda in a different costume, thus one of the main characters. Geno isn’t in any way tied to the identity of Mario, Luigi, Peach or Bowser.Geno will always be a strange phenomenon to me...
It's not just that he's a one-off, it's what he's a one-off to: A side character from a two decades old spin-off from a much more massive franchise that has a consistent cast, and who doesn't even legally belongs to that series.
Yet people have latched on to him due to a comment Sakurai made around Brawl's time.
That managed to get him a costume as DLC in 4, and then in Ultimate he's a Legendary Spirit and online profile icon. But outside of Smash... He rarely gets mentioned, even within the Mario fanbase, I'm pretty sure people speak more of Paper Mario characters and Fawful.
Welp, I never thought I was gonna post this meme I did long back here, but oh welp.
Eh, I did that meme post-Link's Awakening event and no new Zelda spirits have been added, but you'd be right in the Mii costumes department.It's funny how that meme got outdated due to Zelda getting even more Mii costumes and Spirits tbh, even if I get the complaint, lots of FE fans said they'd rather have had more non playable representation of Corrin back in the day and FE was lacking in that department until Ultimate. For the most part anyway, wild how Fates only gets to have 1 song from it'a OST
A minor correction - Sakurai's comment on Geno was made during Smash 4's DLC; it was about both Brawl and Smash 4.Geno will always be a strange phenomenon to me...
It's not just that he's a one-off, it's what he's a one-off to: A side character from a two decades old spin-off from a much more massive franchise that has a consistent cast, and who doesn't even legally belongs to that series.
Yet people have latched on to him due to a comment Sakurai made around Brawl's time.
That managed to get him a costume as DLC in 4, and then in Ultimate he's a Legendary Spirit and online profile icon. But outside of Smash... He rarely gets mentioned, even within the Mario fanbase, I'm pretty sure people speak more of Paper Mario characters and Fawful.
Yeah, Sheik is weird too, she's like Ivysaur in that she got in for the sake of a gimmick, that being transformation.Sheik’s a one off too, but she’s in a different camp. For one, she’s literally Zelda in a different costume, thus one of the main characters. Geno isn’t in any way tied to the identity of Mario, Luigi, Peach or Bowser.
Ah, I see.A minor correction - Sakurai's comment on Geno was made during Smash 4's DLC; it was about both Brawl and Smash 4.
Did you even read MeteoRain's post all the way? That "luxurious content we take for granted" is the non-fighter stuff.Welp, I never thought I was gonna post this meme I did long back here, but oh welp.
I imagine he just assumed the post gave off the same energy as "Zelda is underrepped"Did you even read MeteoRain's post all the way? That "luxurious content we take for granted" is the non-fighter stuff.
And I’m not really sure Nintendo would have any interest in buying the rights to those characters. They don’t usually ever bring back characters from any of the Mario RPG games including the ones they actually have all the rights to.A minor correction - Sakurai's comment on Geno was made during Smash 4's DLC; it was about both Brawl and Smash 4.
Part of the problem is that he, like all of the characters who originated in Super Mario RPG, is owned by Square-Enix, meaning that Smash Bros. (or the occasional Mario spin-off that Square-Enix is involved with, like Mario Sports Mix) is his only reasonable chance to appear unless SE sells the rights for those characters to Nintendo. Other Mario RPGs don't have that kind of rights issue.
I think some users can be too cocky, but it’s not much different from how some conversations go in this thread to be honest. I do think people should have more of an open mind, though. I remember a few dudes being assuming of you and being rude, though, and that was very much unneeded.look fam I understand, but no, that doesnt excuse the passive agressive attitudes. Im sorry, im sure some of them are good people But they are really cocky and such but they fail to understand that they are. And I dont know a single person on earth that Likes overly cocky and passive agressive people
Geno has had fans before Brawl, and iirc Sakurai didn’t say anything about Geno until Smash 4. He said he wanted him in Brawl in that same column. People like Geno because they genuinely like him, not because Sakurai said something about him and now they have to push for him. Sakurai’s comments did give people more hope and make them more confident in Ultimate speculation, but they genuinely want him. Not much different from Phil Spencer giving Banjo-Kazooie fans more hope and enough faith to feel it worthwhile speaking up and campaigning.Geno will always be a strange phenomenon to me...
It's not just that he's a one-off, it's what he's a one-off to: A side character from a two decades old spin-off from a much more massive franchise that has a consistent cast, and who doesn't even legally belongs to that series.
Yet people have latched on to him due to a comment Sakurai made around Brawl's time.
That managed to get him a costume as DLC in 4, and then in Ultimate he's a Legendary Spirit and online profile icon. But outside of Smash... He rarely gets mentioned, even within the Mario fanbase, I'm pretty sure people speak more of Paper Mario characters and Fawful.
Ehhhhhhh hard disagree, I may not be too invested about Zelda Newcomer arguments as most, but this gives off "Metroid only having Samus is very good because the games are about isolation" vibesEh, I did that meme post-Link's Awakening event and no new Zelda spirits have been added, but you'd be right in the Mii costumes department.
It still is outdated with Byleth bringing a stage, some spirits and tracks, admittedly, but overall, Zelda is represented fine imo. It's kinda like how Alpharad puts it: FE is more focused on character investment and interactions, Zelda is more based around items and exploration. So it having the second most items, stages and Assist Trophies seems well enough.
That's fully understandable - one potential pitfall with an ARMS character is that the super-long arms might encourage camping. I'm not only talking "Stand on the edge and camp" camping, but also "monopolize center stage" camping. Of course, I'm saying this with an asterisk since it depends on the start-up / end lag of attacks.
Yeah, I'd be more confident with Geno's chances if he already appeared (or is scheduled to) in other Mario spin off games. Does not disqualify the character, of course, but it would signal concrete interest from both parties involved.A minor correction - Sakurai's comment on Geno was made during Smash 4's DLC; it was about both Brawl and Smash 4.
Part of the problem is that he, like all of the characters who originated in Super Mario RPG, is owned by Square-Enix, meaning that Smash Bros. (or the occasional Mario spin-off that Square-Enix is involved with, like Mario Sports Mix) is his only reasonable chance to appear unless SE sells the rights for those characters to Nintendo. Other Mario RPGs don't have that kind of rights issue.
It helps that fans were prioritizing other characters as well. The NPCs that people wished weren't non-playable? They were a boss and part of an FS. (and I probably shouldn't use WERE for that FS character)was because other characters were prioritized
And yet the Links got copy pasted custom specials in Smash Wii U instead of using their various unique equipment. You know, the ones the games are all about.Eh, I did that meme post-Link's Awakening event and no new Zelda spirits have been added, but you'd be right in the Mii costumes department.
It still is outdated with Byleth bringing a stage, some spirits and tracks, admittedly, but overall, Zelda is represented fine imo. It's kinda like how Alpharad puts it: FE is more focused on character investment and interactions, Zelda is more based around items and exploration. So it having the second most items, stages and Assist Trophies seems well enough.
IMO, the problem is that Zelda isn't underrepped; it's just not diverse.I imagine he just assumed the post gave off the same energy as "Zelda is underrepped"