Jassassino
Smash Apprentice
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2019
- Messages
- 139
Missed the discussion but Assassin's Creed is a brilliant franchise with well above average storytelling, atmosphere and production value.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Why's that?Then I guess that The Legend of Zelda is average at best
The fact that there are people who question Apex of the World being best Three Houses Final Boss theme staggers me.
It is best final boss theme and no one can change my mind lmao.
Because, compared to other rpg series out there, TLOZ is pretty...basic. I like the series well enough but it's far from the most ground breaking or awe inspiring. Game play is generally pretty basic too. Breath of the Wild was the biggest breakthrough in the series IMO but even then it's treading samey territory. Story is pretty samey. It's passable, it's fun but it's average if we want to be honest with ourselves. The Witcher III it isn't.Why's that?
Production values and some of the atmosphere I can agree with as being above average... but the storytelling... the storytelling is where Assassin's Creed feels the need to tell a more complex story than it actually is and it becomes a real mess. Like, it's not the worst for a video game, but I think Assassin's Creed really struggles to understand how to tell stories without making a mess of its own narratives. I do think it has gotten better the more it has moved away from Desmond and the need to somehow tie this back into modern day stuff, but still, I do think AC just struggles in its stories.Missed the discussion but Assassin's Creed is a brilliant franchise with well above average storytelling, atmosphere and production value.
I wasn't asking you, and that doesn't answer the question anyway.Because, compared to other rpg series out there, TLOZ is pretty...basic. I like the series well enough but it's far from the most ground breaking or awe inspiring. Game play is generally pretty basic too. Breath of the Wild was the biggest breakthrough in the series IMO but even then it's treading samey territory. Story is pretty samey. It's passable, it's fun but it's average if we want to be honest with ourselves. The Witcher III it isn't.
Daring today, aren't we.Because, compared to other rpg series out there, TLOZ is pretty...basic. I like the series well enough but it's far from the most ground breaking or awe inspiring. Game play is generally pretty basic too. Breath of the Wild was the biggest breakthrough in the series IMO but even then it's treading samey territory. Story is pretty samey. It's passable, it's fun but it's average if we want to be honest with ourselves. The Witcher III it isn't.
Welcome to a forum where even if you don't address me personally, I have the freedom to weigh in. I also fail to see how I didn't answer the question.I wasn't asking you, and that doesn't answer the question anyway.
Oh-ho-ho-ho-ho! They are very daringDaring today, aren't we.
Desmond did hold back AC a lotProduction values and some of the atmosphere I can agree with as being above average... but the storytelling... the storytelling is where Assassin's Creed feels the need to tell a more complex story than it actually is and it becomes a real mess. Like, it's not the worst for a video game, but I think Assassin's Creed really struggles to understand how to tell stories without making a mess of its own narratives. I do think it has gotten better the more it has moved away from Desmond and the need to somehow tie this back into modern day stuff, but still, I do think AC just struggles in its stories.
My take on western 3rd parties is that, frankly, it depends on if Westerns are going to be scarce or not. Banjo-Kazooie is the only one we’ve gotten, but for all we know we could get more.
I used to think we wouldn’t get any. However, Assassin’s Creed flippin’ massive. Just checking Wikipedia of the “highest selling game series”, and the series currently sits at a cool $140 million, just $2 million under Final Fantasy. Not that sales make a character or series a better pick, but I mean...that’s pretty incredible. A series that has outsold Mario Kart has something to stand on with Smash.
Hasn’t had a chance until now to get into Smash, but I definitely would think of it as a possibility going forward.
I asked "Why's that?" in response to:Welcome to a forum where even if you don't address me personally, I have the freedom to weigh in. I also fail to see how I didn't answer the question.
His wording suggests to me that he thinks that follows from my post he quoted. I don't see how, though.Then I guess that The Legend of Zelda is average at best
Rex was shot down for this pass.Xenoblade. Rex was shot down, but there’s Elma or even Mecha-Fiora (Chrom paved the way for the latter I’d say)
no, KOS-MOS doesn’t count as she’s from Xenosaga.
Have you compared to other characters numbers? Its the second most viewed of the DLC after Joker.English Hero presentation: 2.4M views
Japanese Hero presentation: 1.6M views
By the anti-Banjo crowd's logic, it wasn't Japan who wanted DQ content.
If they start releasing alternate costume DLC packs, now we know what Villager and Isabelle's costumes should be...Assassin's Creed in Smash? I for one have been waiting for AC vs AC for a long time now.
View attachment 248092
View attachment 248091
Because I am assuming that he views LOZ the same as you view ARMS. They both 'don't suck' but that's about it, yet Zelda has reps and ARMs doesn't. You claim they have to do more than 'not suck' to get a rep. Zelda doesn't suck...but I don't feel the series (outside of a select few LOZ titles) are more than 'not sucky'. So in that case, why again does ARMS not have at least one rep while Zelda has many? (Seniority not withstanding as seniority isn't exactly a basis for being included)I asked "Why's that?" in response to:
His wording suggests to me that he thinks that follows from my post he quoted. I don't see how, though.
Your post was just some unrelated reasons you think LoZ is average.
Because Arms comes out much, much, MUCH later than Zelda?why again does ARMS not have at least one rep while Zelda has many?
I wasn't seriously saying TLoZ is an average series. I said that as a kind of joke. You said ARMS should do more than not to suck to get a playable character and with my previous comment I alluded to the frequent discussion of "TLoZ never gets new characters". Basically I was just memeing saying Zelda is average and my reason for saying that was that the series had not received new characters for years.I asked "Why's that?" in response to:
His wording suggests to me that he thinks that follows from my post he quoted. I don't see how, though.
Your post was just some unrelated reasons you think LoZ is average.
I was referring to this list!Going from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_highest-grossing_video_game_franchises
Final Fantasy is shown at $10 billion+ vs. AssCreed at $4 billion+...
Not sure where the numbers you got were from, or which are more accurate (more legwork than I'm keen to put in right now), but eh...
AC is obviously no slouch, even still.
So did Splatoon, but Splatoon has a rep now (Granted several years later). ARMs came out 'long enough' before Smash Ultimate (A full year before). It wasn't like ARMS came out a month or two prior to Ultimate's launch.Because Arms comes out much, much, MUCH later than Zelda?
So did Xenoblade 2, but apparently both that and ARMS were past the "cutoff date". Persona 5 and Dragon Quest XI were before that cutoff date, but the fact they're 3rd party is probably another point in their favorSo did Splatoon, but Splatoon has a rep now. ARMs came out 'long enough' before Smash Ultimate (A full year before). It wasn't like ARMS came out a month or two prior to Ultimate's launch.
Hmm. Okay, you have a point. Butttttt Splatoon was a huge hit. Arms did okay, I guess.So did Splatoon, but Splatoon has a rep now. ARMs came out 'long enough' before Smash Ultimate (A full year before). It wasn't like ARMS came out a month or two prior to Ultimate's launch.
Granted, but Sakurai has been making it clear that gameplay of a character is what will be the more deciding factor. Even if ARMS sold only okay, if he wanted to make ARMS characters playable, he sure could have. In that regard, the reason we don't have an ARMS rep is he couldn't make a move set he was satisfied with or wouldn't find them as fun in Smash's format, which is fine. But saying the reason that they aren't playable is because their game is 'simply passable and nothing more' isn't really a credible argument at this point, which is what I'm getting at. If it was all just by sheer sales figures or whatever, Game & Watch would hardly be in Smash to this date. How much money has G&W made lately to retain his spot on the roster? XDHmm. Okay, you have a point. Butttttt Splatoon was a huge hit. Arms did okay, I guess.
Hmm. Those are apparently unit sales rather than revenue. Even then, I'd expect a larger disparity considering the disparity in revenue that is reported, but I'd imagine the financial numbers being used include factors beyond box sales, so subscriptions for XI and XIV (and DLC/MT purchases for AC) may be thrown in as well.I was referring to this list!
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_best-selling_video_game_franchises
That’s a pretty stark difference, but I’m sure there’s something in the fine print separating what each list is looking at!
Dude, you're talking to a guy who just want old characters back in Smash that was cut. I don't know how to argue like you people.How much money has G&W made lately to retain his spot on the roster? XD
My question is though...I personally think that Spirits absolutely are not disconfirmations. I want Spirit promotions, but I don't know if we'll get any. It's still somewhat likely though.
Oh I'm not arguing, man. I'm just making a point and also making a playful jab at the idea that 'it sold lots so it gets in over games that sold less'. Especially when Sakurai is making it clear that $ made isn't the biggest factor of who is being added in Smash or remains in Smash (Since G&W doesn't really make any money these days). I mean, heck, Banjo wasn't making any money for years yet...GUH HUH! He's here! So it's all about what Sakurai thinks will be fun and people will like, not the sales success of a character.Dude, you're talking to a guy who just want old characters back in Smash that was cut. I don't know how to argue like you people.
That's what I figured. The joke relies on a logical fallacy, though. If you're interested in that, you can read the spoiler text.I wasn't seriously saying TLoZ is an average series. I said that as a kind of joke. You said ARMS should do more than not to suck to get a playable character and with my previous comment I alluded to the frequent discussion of "TLoZ never gets new characters". Basically I was just memeing saying Zelda is average and my reason for saying that was that the series had not received new characters for years.
I did the "joke" because I don't think ARMS is close to suck as I think your message implied. In any case we all have different opinions and it seems my joke wasn't that good, so don't worry haha.
I can rephrase that as:ARMS didn't "get robbed." A game should have to do more than not suck to get playable representation in Smash.
Idk how ANYONE could call Zelda "basic" and "samey" when games like Link to the Past, Ocarina, and BOTW revolutionize the idea of action adventure games.Because, compared to other rpg series out there, TLOZ is pretty...basic. I like the series well enough but it's far from the most ground breaking or awe inspiring. Game play is generally pretty basic too. Breath of the Wild was the biggest breakthrough in the series IMO but even then it's treading samey territory. Story is pretty samey. It's passable, it's fun but it's average if we want to be honest with ourselves. The Witcher III it isn't.
Here's to hoping they pop up in the future DLC Supposing they do more first parties, that is. Add those they may have wanted but didn't have time for, etc.The reason why ARMS or XBC2 were not picked was simple, development time was quite short and everything was decided before the release of ARMS. Timing is a big aspect as to why we get clones as well.
That's probably because it's not an rpg.Because, compared to other rpg series out there, TLOZ is pretty...basic.