Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I think its because I'm probably posting a lot and I'm saying my stances/opinions on things, but people could be interpreting it as scum like behavior.
Kinda
since I'm actually talking the most here I'm kinda under the impression the mafia will target me night 1.Entirely true. You never know who the scum is going to pick. Even if you're a strong player, perhaps the scum really wants to kill the watcher/tracker and thinks you're not it, or they have too many connections to you.
NO god dangit. I was hoping so hard that this word would never make an appearance. And now I have to explain it.
![Terywj [태리]](/data/avatars/l/71/71007.jpg?1555906021){kind=avatar}
Deadline is the 17th.
I can agree with this as a whole.
That's not a good thing, you know. If it requires a player's death for his reads to become useful - reads that he didn't even explain! - then it's obvious that something's not correct. For all we know, there is nothing that can keep him from forming more credible arguments that could allow us to make better reads without his death. He should make himself useful in a way that doesn't require causalities for us, otherwise we'd have to deal with a dumb WIFOM situation.
I thought that was already implied with my post.That's not a good thing, you know. If it requires a player's death for his reads to become useful - reads that he didn't even explain! - then it's obvious that something's not correct. For all we know, there is nothing that can keep him from forming more credible arguments that could allow us to make better reads without his death. He should make himself useful in a way that doesn't require causalities for us, otherwise we'd have to deal with a dumb WIFOM situation.
I was just going to say this. I was re reading over posts and this hits it on the head.
Lol no. Am I still voting for him?Sokr, do you actually think Serin is scum?
I shall, I will be replying to why I believe Sokr is scum later on in this post. I want to know your stance on the people I am looking at.
I'll have to go look back for his post.
Overly concerned with what? The people I'm targeting. I'm the only one who has made a push and has backed his claim up (even though it hasn't been a lot.).
Yes, i know that the way I worded that one post was peculiar. I actually like D1 to be long. I guess the reason I seem so "rushed" is that right now no one is speaking their mind, kinda. No one is making any sort of movement for who they believe is scum. This is RVS, why is no one actually spitting a RV out?
As for your reads...'Surprised' isn't exactly my feeling towards it, but I'm curious as to what I did/posted to get me on that list.
For you John, it was your lackluster-ness in the beginning. You had your RV and that was it. There was nothing in what you have posted that convinced me that I could agree with you if you made a claim right now. I know this sounds like an odd reasoning, but this is a game about building trust even though 2 people are trying to be deceitful while building trust. I'm just not seeing it with your posts.
I guess this is what I get for trying to be more a more active poster :L I will admit that my wording could have been a **** ton better lol, I will try to be more clear so my posts don't get misinterpreted.
Once I posted this, the post immediately following it had and *or that was to replace the and.
Despite it being my RVS vote, I am convinced that Serin could be scum. (70/30 scum).So my question is: What are we supposed to believe? Is it RVS and are you just randomly pushing people or are you serious about your reads? If it's the former then you need to explain why you're adamantly sticking to your reads right now when the pushes are supposed to be random. If it's the latter then you owe an explanation on your scum reads.
The thing is that I didn't misinterpret anything you said. Take a good look at my post again: I even mentioned explicitly that accusations based on your poor wording are faulty. Not only did you not respond to my point, you actually responded to a point that I distanced myself from. You just told me the complete opposite of what you were supposed to explain.
So how come you are convinced that he *could* be scum more so than anybody else? Anybody *could* be scum at this point! Randomly slapping a ratio onto your read doesn't make it a credible statement all of a sudden. As long as you don't explain what your scum read is based on claiming a "70/30" ratio is just as worthless as claiming a "100/0" ratio. Tell me how and why you've come to the conclusion that he's more likely to be scum than anybody else, everything else doesn't make me believe your read.
A push doesn't just appear out of the thin air. It happens because somebody takes the initiative. If you're dissatisfied with people thinking you're scum respond to the accusations. If you think a Serin lynch is likely to give us a scum flip tell us why we should buy your story. This isn't a game of following people around ... in the very first post I made after the game started I told you to stand by your own ideas - complaining that nobody offers reads that you can agree with doesn't go along well with that attitude. If you don't see anybody making a credible push MAKE ONE YOURSELF.
Eh. It really depends on the situation, but it kinda doesn't matter.
This is more like town behaviour, dunno why you're so paranoid about this part of your play unless you yourself think the stances/opinions/posts are fluffy.
Why? A smart scum team would target either someone who hasn't talked or an IC, if they're jerks. Unless you're somehow spot on with your reads, which I'll get to in a sec.Kinda
What? Do you mean following up on RVs? How does one follow up on something chosen randomly and not taken seriously?
I wouldn't agree with you if you made a claim right now, not with your 'spoiler list' tease - came across not only as deceptive but also a tad arrogant about lynches, a simple 'ill give my reads when i have them backed up' would've been fine. For that matter, I see no reason to trust you right now. John was lackluster in the beginning, but so was I. So is Marathon.
You're doing everything I did in my first game as scum - flowery language, long multi-quoted posts, insertion of non-relevance/irl excuses to make the frequency of posts seem more casual. This isn't a lie, you can go check my first-ever game. What say you to this?
i feel this still applies, and that your explanation doesn't cut it. I want the pressure kept on Ori, since it feels he talks more when that happens.gheb said:
'im ok with this, seems like a newbie who doesn't want to come on as too strong'
'seems like he has a tentative reason to vote ori, why'd he make it ambiguous with this RVS escape route?'
'oh, this is why.'
i think an extra vote on ori will be some nice pressure for him to sit down and rethink his play, want to oblige me?
I find this kinda scummy, personally.
not 100% sure if i got the meaning of this, but if so, serin, who of the 'active players' do you most want to hear from, and do you have any reads (scum mainly, town if you want to talk about that)?I say we aren't. We have a solid stance on what most of think of everyone who's been active.
I want to see more from Marathonman, mainly. But other than him, I'm sure everyone else has a standpoint on who all could be town, and who could be scum.
)