Canon refers to something viewed as "official" in a fictional universe and it's story. Mario Party, Mario Kart, and Mario sports games have no relation to the Mario canon story (as simple as it is), so therefore they are not canon to the Mario platformers. The various Mario sports games, Mario Party, and Mario Kart are a different canon universe.
There is no proof of this. You're making up your own storyline here. What you're talking about is perhaps the main story, at most. They're all connected until Nintendo says otherwise. Enough with the infactual argument. It already failed.
By canon I am referring to Donkey Kong, DK Jr., Mario Bros., SMB 1-3 and Lost Levels, World 1 and 2, Yoshi's Island DS, 64, Sunshine, Galaxy 1 and 2, Mario Land 10-3, both NEW Super Mario Bros. games, and all remakes and re-releases of all said game. I cannot find any relations from other Mario games to the central Mario canon.
Nintendo has not stated this officially. Your argument holds no water.
And yes, canon is a legitimate argument in smash bros, regardless of what you say. The Chewbacca argument may have gotten O.J. Simpson away with murder, but it won't make Waluigi a playable character in Smash Bros!
Only if it's actually legitimate, which it is NOT in this case. There's is no officially stated Canon in the Mario Universe. The argument is flawed from the start. It fails.
The "there are too many Toads" argument can be beaten in two word: Yoshi. Link. There are dozens of both of them.
There is only one Link per series, and he's the reincarnation of them all. Which means it's overall the same soul. Same person. Also, that doesn't matter, since Yoshi actually stars as a main character in his own game. He also is shown as the main Yoshi is various media too. Same as Toad. However, you cannot say which exact Toad is the main one. Nor have I said which exact Yoshi is the main one, now have I? Your argument holds no water in this case.
Still, there are specific Toads, like Toadsworth, and the Toad Brigade... and Toadette I guess.
Exactly. Toadsworth could bring a lot to the table. Just as unique moves as Toad, and a cane. Plus, being an old man, he'd have great fighting experience possibly.
Whether Toad is important enough in the Mario universe to warrant a spot is still (I think) the big question mark for Toad on his possibility of being playable in smash. Either way, by the time we see Peach we'll probably have an answer.
All that matters is that he Sakurai thinks Toad can be usable for Smash.
I want a character who plays unique, above all. That is what I think most people want. I think there tons upon tons of characters that are could have a more unique move set and play style that Waluigi.
You still have no proof of this statement. Toad isn't any more unique than him in a playstyle. You're making up your own world here.
Well there are all kinds of assist trophies. Sure, some like Starfy, Saki, and Little Mac seemed destined to be playable, but most are there just because they are random, funny, useful, or popular but not "fit" for being playable. I think Waluigi fits in that last category.
He doesn't fit the last one at all. His body shape is perfect for Smash, his style is easily translateable into Smash. Once again, you're making up things to prove your point.
ROB had a pre-Brawl following, for sure. It was small. It had like 12 people on Smash Boards. The same goes with the Pokémon Trainer. Every character under the sun imaginable had at least 12 people supporting them, including nearly every Pokémon, Darth Vader, Vegeta, and Mickey Mouse (I'm not joking).
So Waluigi has more than R.O.B. Imagine that, right?
Lucario also got in because he had a unique ability and he was the "icon" of the 4th Generation of Pokémon. Besides, the popularity of any Pokémon that is seen as a front-runner for a new roster spot is usually more popular than just about any character. The same thing happened with Mewtwo in Melee. Expect that huge hype to happen again with a new(er) Pokémon. Waluigi's popularity will never be as big as that Pokémon popularity.
He wasn't the icon of 4th Gen. Only the Legendaries are the true icons. There's quite a difference. He's only an icon in the Anime via a movie. In fact, every single random character(Pichu and Lucario) happen to also have movie stuff too.
And Waluigi was popular before Lucario was. Once again, your statement isn't even provable. You think he might not be as popular.
Fun fact: There was a "Darth Vader for Brawl" and "Mickey Mouse for Brawl" threads. Just sayin'!
Ignoring threads for characters that aren't eligible, you have no point here. Waluigi is eligible. Try again.
ROB was a free attachment to the NES, and one of the NES' main selling points. He could dance, interact for a game or two, and was something you certainly didn't see on a game console before. ROB's game Gyromite was also a key NES launch title. The ROB attachment definitely helped end the North American video game crash of the early 1980's. You gotta love him just for that!
And everybody knew this? Nope. Too many players have started off with the Wii or GameCube alone. They'll remember him more likely from MKDS, UNLESS they actually researched Nintendo stuff, OR are very old, like in their 30's atleast. I didn't say he wasn't important at all. But you're acting like everybody knew this. How could they? I mean, some starting playing Brawl when they were 10 years old! The problem is, once again, you're acting like everybody is knowledgeable about everything in Nintendo history. This is not the case whatsoever. Not everybody is a researcher.
That's because I heard the "arguments" you give before Brawl came out, and I expect the same result as Brawl.
I'm still waiting for a good argument for keeping him out, which yours have all been disproven. There is no official Mario Canon, so that's out. He's memorable, more popular than you think(really, the first people I've asked about Waluigi? They'd gladly play as him), and he isn't a "bad" character by any means. Your arguments really no longer hold any water.
The only other characters who appeared in smash bros that appeared in series without a recent title or as one off characters were the sole main character in their respective game/series. I also doubt we will get a new Zelda character.
Peach got in well before Super Princess Peach. Luigi is just a supporting player in the Mario games, and the entire thing is based upon Mario doing it, not Luigi. The only game where Luigi is actually the main character is Mario is Missing, and who counts that game? Also, Ganondorf isn't the "sole main character" in Zelda. So your statement is actually quite incorrect as is. Try again. If you mean the set of main characters, I could agree with THAT, but what you're saying isn't true whatsoever. Sheik is only in one-game, so she's pretty much a one-off, ain't she? Wolf isn't actually playable till Assault, right? He's not a main playable character either. In fact, not everyone is by default. Also, no Pokemon besides Pikachu and Pokemon Trainer apply for that statement, same with Ganondorf and Sheik. Zelda's only playable in two officially non-canon games.(the rest are canon as of this time)
I do have some clues. I guessed nearly the entire Brawl roster right, minus the "WTF?" character (The Pokémon Trainer) and the retro character (R.O.B.). Plus I tend to guess things right. I was pretty close then, and I assume I will be pretty close again to the actual roster.
So you made one good guess. What about Melee and 64's roster? Were you also almost completely right on that? One time makes a great guesser, not an actual master of it. I could've guessed most of the roster too. In fact, none of it surprised me whatsoever save R.O.B. I found the rest rather obvious myself.