GOTM
Smash Champion
tell me why D20's sig is prob the best on smashboards.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
ROFL Cape doesn't play this game anymore and mow doesn't give a **** about tournamentsSwiftbass is too ****ing good.
Mow isn't ranked i believe because of no recent tournament entry, same goes for The Cape.
I do! I just go to college in Edinboro.swiftbass
that is all
edit: man, i thought zig-zag lived in st. louis >.>;
My point still stands. The rankings are done based on tournament placings, not how good a players is.ROFL Cape doesn't play this game anymore and mow doesn't give a **** about tournaments
Figured I'd make it easier for you to read.Finally, with such a large state, it is very likely that some people have never even been at the same tournament, much less played each other, so the panelists will have to simply make their best judgment on who in the panel should be ranked the highest.
As I said, MM anyone in the rankings if you disagree. I don't think anyone else in the state is better than anyone in the top 10. If you do, seriously, I will bet you money that you are wrong.Figured I'd make it easier for you to read.
Unless you guys consider Magus to be NJ, he's not listed at all even as a top player not ranked for activity reasons, and he's about as good as Lord Knight imo.I don't think anyone else in the state is better than anyone in the top 10. If you do, seriously, I will bet you money that you are wrong.
lol Let's do it Dot, either @ VLS or Smashpocalypse.scar $3 mm
Scar MM me at Smashpocalypse MM=1$ =]]lol Let's do it Dot, either @ VLS or Smashpocalypse.
Hey I played in MLG Philly, lol.One of our requirements is to play in a pa tourny.
I was going to put this in an edit on my previous post, but I decided I want to make sure no one misses it.A-Loan, MM 100 dollars.
Woah @_@)... that was a cool read >_<)/I was going to put this in an edit on my previous post, but I decided I want to make sure no one misses it.
Alan, you are extremely irritating. You, as far as I've heard, are nowhere near approaching top 15. I'm sure you have no idea as to what the skill levels of PA players are at this point. So where the hell do you get off making such a ridiculously bold statement?
Last time, you had half of PA behind you if you made that statement, in large part because people don't really understand how good Velocity is. Velocity is far better than you, and better than everyone ranked below him.
But now, you're just some jerk who wants to have an argument. You have no idea what you're talking about, and no one knowledgeable is going to agree with you save other jerks who want to argue.
This is a good list, and you go right on ahead being an *** but I'm going to call you on it. If you really have a problem with it why don't you go on ahead and make an actual point, such as naming who is too high and who should be higher than them.
And please don't say Renth. Renth should be happy with his placement and only feels underranked because again, he has no idea of the relative skill of his competition, since he hasn't played the game in roughly 2 months now.
I completely agree with you Scar. I haven't touched PA smash in about 2 months there's no arguement there what so ever i've been inactive and am moving back to FL me being on the rankings alone is good enough =)I
And please don't say Renth. Renth should be happy with his placement and only feels underranked because again, he has no idea of the relative skill of his competition, since he hasn't played the game in roughly 2 months now.
Our primary criteria is tournament results, as in overall placings. Obviously, more recent results hold more weight. Then, we consider how each player on the panel achieved those placings (who they beat, who they lost to). Finally, with such a large state, it is very likely that some people have never even been at the same tournament, much less played each other, so the panelists will have to simply make their best judgment on who in the panel should be ranked the highest.
Well duh, if you weren't on there we would lose SO many Sexy Ganon Points. And I hope Alan does get better since we should have no problem ranking our top 15 players, but since there was so much riffraff in the 13-15 range, there was really nothing the panelists could do, save arbitrarily picking 3 players for the sake of having a complete list.me being on the rankings alone is good enough =)
brings back memories of the pokemon board in the summer.....I was going to put this in an edit on my previous post, but I decided I want to make sure no one misses it.
Alan, you are extremely irritating. You, as far as I've heard, are nowhere near approaching top 15. I'm sure you have no idea as to what the skill levels of PA players are at this point. So where the hell do you get off making such a ridiculously bold statement?
Last time, you had half of PA behind you if you made that statement, in large part because people don't really understand how good Velocity is. Velocity is far better than you, and better than everyone ranked below him.
But now, you're just some jerk who wants to have an argument. You have no idea what you're talking about, and no one knowledgeable is going to agree with you save other jerks who want to argue.
This is a good list, and you go right on ahead being an *** but I'm going to call you on it. If you really have a problem with it why don't you go on ahead and make an actual point, such as naming who is too high and who should be higher than them.
And please don't say Renth. Renth should be happy with his placement and only feels underranked because again, he has no idea of the relative skill of his competition, since he hasn't played the game in roughly 2 months now.
accepted i'll take his place and i call no more player replacementsA-Loan should also MM me for $100.
LOL JD COME VISIT ME!!!! Where the hell have you been? Get yo' stinky *** on the train.accepted i'll take his place and i call no more player replacements
Well, first off, in the sake of your own argument, you'd be well-advised not to criticize my skill level without actually having any true knowledge of my ability outside of what your friends have told you. Doing such is making the exact same mistake you're accusing me of.snip
Of course you won't. That's fine, I don't really care. But really, you haven't tried to make a change, so you can't act like you're giving up. And please don't try to take an intellectual high ground on me, it's sad.Finally, to clarify, this isn't an open argument and I'm not going to bother addressing your retorts.
sooo.... what exactly are you saying.... @_@)...?Well, first off, in the sake of your own argument, you'd be well-advised not to criticize my skill level without actually having any true knowledge of my ability outside of what your friends have told you. Doing such is making the exact same mistake you're accusing me of.
Additionally, it's worth noting that I've never brought up my own skill level in anything I've said, nor have I even so much as implied that I feel I should be ranked myself. I'm on the wagon of total disconcern for whether or not I'm ranked. Again, bringing up my skill level adds nothing to your counter-argument except clutter for me to read through (unless that's some disorientation tactic).
I'm curious as to the statement of mine you're referring to in your second paragraph. If it is in reference to my very last post, I hope you recognize that I was precisely quoting your own PA finder's words and merely highlighting the section I found amusing. If it's referring to my comment on the untruthfulness of the finder, implying that the panel has no clue what they're doing, you might just be surprised by the quantity of people who are in fact still on my side.
The past has already proven that the lists are indisputable. They're governed by a subjective system which is no more than the collective opinions of a select group, obviously making contraversy unavoidable. The problem arises when any such contraversy is negated by an allied panel defending their collective opinion. If the panel holds authority, and by the nature of its members opens no doors to potential changes, then that panel has complete, indisputable power to adjust the rankings based on purely their own knowledge (or lack their of) and silence outside influence, justifying it with authority rather than accepted reason.
Finally, to clarify, this isn't an open argument and I'm not going to bother addressing your retorts. I've said my piece, so there is now at least something in this thread that's right.
He's saying that people don't like the list, even though no one has said anything besides him. He's also saying that the list is very subjective, and that it's simply what the panelists think and that's that.sooo.... what exactly are you saying.... @_@)...?
Two of the problems are imbedded in this statement.virtually all of the top players are in accord.